Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Rate theory validation data

A theoretical description of the addition reaction, based on Troe s formulation of unimolecular reaction rate theory, has been constructed to address the question of the consistency of our results and the earlier low temperature measurements. These calculations show a dramatic combined temperature and pressure dependence of this rate constant which must be included when this reaction is incorporated into models of combustion chemistry. These results illustrate the need to combine individual experimental data with a theoretical overview in order to obtain a description valid over the range of T and P likely encountered in combustion systems. [Pg.240]

For a new process plant, calculations can be carried out using the heat release and plume flow rate equations outlined in Table 13.16 from a paper by Bender. For the theory to he valid, the hood must he more than two source diameters (or widths for line sources) above the source, and the temperature difference must be less than 110 °C. Experimental results have also been obtained for the case of hood plume eccentricity. These results account for cross drafts which occur within most industrial buildings. The physical and chemical characteristics of the fume and the fume loadings are obtained from published or available data of similar installations or established through laboratory or pilot-plant scale tests. - If exhaust volume requirements must he established accurately, small scale modeling can he used to augment and calibrate the analytical approach. [Pg.1269]

Rp data are meaningful for general or uniform corrosion but less so for localized corrosion, including MIC. In addition, the use of the Stem-Geary theory where the corrosion rate is inversely proportional to Rp at potentials close to is valid for conditions controlled by electron transfer, but not for the diffusion-controlled systems frequently found in MC. [Pg.212]

In this article we use transition state theory (TST) to analyze rate data. But TST is by no means universally accepted as valid for the purpose of answering the questions we ask about catalytic systems. For example, Simonyi and Mayer (5) criticize TST mainly because the usual derivation depends upon applying the Boltzmann distribution law where they think it should not be applied, and because thermodynamic concepts are used improperly. Sometimes general doubts that TST can be used reliably are expressed (6). But TST has also been used with considerable success. Horiuti, Miyahara, and Toyoshima (7) successfully used theory almost the same as TST in 66 sets of reported kinetic data for metal-catalyzed reactions. The site densities they calculated were usually what was expected. (Their method is discussed further in Section II,B,7.)... [Pg.100]

Finally, yet another issue enters into the interpretation of nonlinear Arrhenius plots of enzyme-catalyzed reactions. As is seen in the examples above, one typically plots In y ax (or. In kcat) versus the reciprocal absolute temperature. This protocol is certainly valid for rapid equilibrium enzymes whose rate-determining step does not change throughout the temperature range studied (and, in addition, remains rapid equilibrium throughout this range). However, for steady-state enzymes, other factors can influence the interpretation of the nonlinear data. For example, for an ordered two-substrate, two-product reaction, kcat is equal to kskjl ks + k ) in which ks and k are the off-rate constants for the two products. If these two rate constants have a different temperature dependency (e.g., ks > ky at one temperature but not at another temperature), then a nonlinear Arrhenius plot may result. See Arrhenius Equation Owl Transition-State Theory van t Hoff Relationship... [Pg.66]

Figure 4. Burning rate data plotted to test validity of granular diffusion flame theory (99)... Figure 4. Burning rate data plotted to test validity of granular diffusion flame theory (99)...
In order to analyze these data, the frequency shift of geffectivecan be calculated by averaging over all orientations the anisotropic shift derived from a static spin Hamiltonian [67]. This treatment is based on the assumptions that molecular motion neither changes the spin precession rate nor perturbs the states and, thus, that the center of gravity of the spectrum is invariant even in presence of some motional averaging. For the allowed 11/2) <-> <-l/2 transition under perturbation theory, with expressions valid up to the third order, this shift is given by [47] ... [Pg.220]

A further advance occurred when Chesnavich et al. (1980) applied variational transition state theory (Chesnavich and Bowers 1982 Garrett and Truhlar 1979a,b,c,d Horiuti 1938 Keck 1967 Wigner 1937) to calculate the thermal rate coefficient for capture in a noncentral field. Under the assumptions that a classical mechanical treatment is valid and that the reactants are in equilibrium, this treatment provides an upper bound to the true rate coefficient. The upper bound was then compared to calculations by the classical trajectory method (Bunker 1971 Porter and Raff 1976 Raff and Thompson 1985 Truhlar and Muckerman 1979) of the true thermal rate coefficient for capture on the ion-dipole potential energy surface and to experimental data (Bohme 1979) on thermal ion-polar molecule rate coefficients. The results showed that the variational bound, the trajectory results, and the experimental upper bound were all in excellent agreement. Some time later, Su and Chesnavich (Su 1985 Su and Chesnavich 1982) parameterized the collision rate coefficient by using trajectory calculations. [Pg.7]

Some of the initial work dealt with the formation of proton-bound dimers in simple amines. Those systems were chosen because the only reaction that occurs is clustering. A simple energy transfer mechanism was proposed by Moet-Ner and Field (1975), and RRKM calculations performed by Olmstead et al. (1977) and Jasinski et al. (1979) seemed to fit the data well. Later, phase space theory was applied (Bass et al. 1979). In applying phase space theory, it is usually assumed that the energy transfer mechanism of reaction (2 ) is valid and that the collisional rate coefficients kx and fc can be calculated from Langevin or ADO theory and equilibrium constants. [Pg.11]


See other pages where Rate theory validation data is mentioned: [Pg.253]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.1900]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.659]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.957]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.680]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.522]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.139 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.139 ]




SEARCH



Data rate

Data validation

Data validity

Rate Theory

© 2024 chempedia.info