Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Random point distribution

The basic grid of points in three dimensions is generated with the Diophantine method [26]-[28], which is pseudo-random in the sense that the same random point distribution is obtained for the same set of initial parameters. This grid is generally adequate for the region between the atoms, where the valence functions dominate and no large variations in the density occur. [Pg.58]

When experimental data is to be fit with a mathematical model, it is necessary to allow for the facd that the data has errors. The engineer is interested in finding the parameters in the model as well as the uncertainty in their determination. In the simplest case, the model is a hn-ear equation with only two parameters, and they are found by a least-squares minimization of the errors in fitting the data. Multiple regression is just hnear least squares applied with more terms. Nonlinear regression allows the parameters of the model to enter in a nonlinear fashion. The following description of maximum likehhood apphes to both linear and nonlinear least squares (Ref. 231). If each measurement point Uj has a measurement error Ayi that is independently random and distributed with a normal distribution about the true model y x) with standard deviation <7, then the probability of a data set is... [Pg.501]

Figure 4 Distributions for separations between the nearest distances nearest NPs, saddle points, NPs with the same (++) and opposite winding numbers (+-) in a chaotic Sinai billiard. The radial distribution of nearest distances for completely random points (26) is shown by the dashed curve in (a). The corresponding distribution for the Berry model function for a chaotic state (2) and random superposition of 16 eigen functions for a rectangular box with the same size and energy are shown by dots and thin curves, respectively. Figure 4 Distributions for separations between the nearest distances nearest NPs, saddle points, NPs with the same (++) and opposite winding numbers (+-) in a chaotic Sinai billiard. The radial distribution of nearest distances for completely random points (26) is shown by the dashed curve in (a). The corresponding distribution for the Berry model function for a chaotic state (2) and random superposition of 16 eigen functions for a rectangular box with the same size and energy are shown by dots and thin curves, respectively.
These maximum likelihood methods can be used to obtain point estimates of a parameter, but we must remember that a point estimator is a random variable distributed in some way around the true value of the parameter. The true parameter value may be higher or lower than our estimate, ft is often useftd therefore to obtain an interval within which we are reasonably confident the true value will he, and the generally accepted method is to construct what are known as confidence limits. [Pg.904]

For now, we restrict our discussion to the 0 point, where the poly-mers in solution have a random coil distribution. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that in the semidilute regime at the 6 point the distribution of the segments in the solution is spherical. With this concept, the velocity of the diffusing segments at the 6 condition can be expressed as... [Pg.51]

It is important to explain the meaning of this equation. First of all, let us point out that p(0) denotes the initial random walker distribution. The main purpose of this treatment is to determine the distribution at time f, p(f), as a function of the initial condition p(0). Equation (60) serves this important purpose as follows. It determines p(f) through the occurrence of random events. A random event corresponds to the occurrence of jumps from one site to other sites, with a probability described by the matrix M. The times of occurrence of these jumps are described by the function v /" (f). When we observe the system at time f, the distribution p is the result of an arbitrary number n of these random events. The function / (t) denotes the probability that at time f, and exactly at time f, the wth of a sequence of n random events occurs. Of course, we have also to consider the case when no event occurs, this being expressed by [/0 (f) = 8(f). It is evident that... [Pg.376]

If we compare Eq. (XV.2.8) with Eq. (XV.2.3), we see that the latter is about twice as large. This is to be expected because the latter measures the frequency of all A-B encounters, while Eq. (XV.2.8) measures only new encounters. Collins and KimbalP have pointed out that in a diffusion-controlled bimolecular reaction between A and B, the initial rate which can be characterized by a random spatial distribution of A and B decays to the lower rate given by Eq. (XV.2.9). The reason for this is that the reaction tends to draw off the A-B pairs in close proximity and leaves a stationary distribution of A-B which approaches that given by the concentration gradient of Eq. (XV.2.6). The relaxation time for such a decay is of the order of " riB/ir AB, which for most molecular systems will be of the order of 10 sec, or the actual time of an encounter. Noyes has shown that there exist certain experimental systems in which these effects can be observed. We shall say more about them later in our discussion of cage effects in liquids. [Pg.498]

To evaluate the effectiveness of SAGE in terms of diversity selection and chemical space coverage, several simulated datasets were used. For instance, in a geometrical space (2D or lOOD), a certain number of cluster centers were generated, which were more than a preset distance away from each other. Some 99 cluster centers were then generated in a 2D space, and 95 cluster centers were generated in a lOOD space. Then, a random number (between 1 and 100) of points for each cluster were generated around each cluster center within a cutoff distance, so that no members from two different clusters could overlap. This led to two simulated data sets one with 951 points distributed in 99 clusters in 2D space, and second with 950 points distributed in 95 clusters in lOOD space. [Pg.274]

Cu(00 )2 distributes 49 on Factor 2 with 31 on Factor 3, relatively poor separations. An often used rule-of-thumb is that loadings greater than 0.3 should be considered significant (12, p.lO). As will be evident from the discussion below on separability of species, the 100 random-point-factors are a more accurate representation of the behavior of the hydroxo complexes over a wide pH range than are the 30 and 26 point factors. The experiments of Andrew aZ. are restricted to three pH values 7.A,... [Pg.645]

Most of the lunar meteorite highland regolith breccias, which come from widely scattered random points, are remarkably KREEP-poor compared to the Apollo and Luna regolith samples (Table 3). The recent Lunar Prospector maps of the global distributions of thorium, uranium, potassium, and samarium (Lawrence et al., 2002a Prettyman et al., 2002 Elphic et al., 2000) revealed that the Apollo/Luna sampling region happens to be atypically KREEP-rich. [Pg.573]

In the present work, Eq. (3) is calculated in the DV method, i.e. the integration is evaluated as the weighted sum of the integrand values at the discrete points distributed randomly according to a certain sampling function (20). The validity of the DV integration scheme in the calculation of the dipole matrix element has been already tested (23). [Pg.142]

To estimate the expected number of tries required to find a point + j such that A(J> < 0 we consider a random walk in which a step is determined by chooang a random point from a uniform distribution on the unit hypersphere centered at and moving in that direction a constant distance AX. The probability that the step so chosen has a component pointing toward the center of curvature of the contour = constant (toward the stationary point) equals the fraction... [Pg.13]

Figure 2.5. A random distribution of spheres in two dimensions. Two spherical shells of width da with radius a and 2a are drawn (the diameter of the spheres is a). On the left, the center of the spherical shell coincides with the center of one particle, whereas on the right, the center of the spherical shell has been chosen at a random point. It is clearly observed that two shells on the left are filled by centers of particles to a larger extent than the corresponding shells on the right. The average excess of particles in these shells, drawn from the center of a given particle, is manifested by the various peaks of g(R). Figure 2.5. A random distribution of spheres in two dimensions. Two spherical shells of width da with radius a and 2a are drawn (the diameter of the spheres is a). On the left, the center of the spherical shell coincides with the center of one particle, whereas on the right, the center of the spherical shell has been chosen at a random point. It is clearly observed that two shells on the left are filled by centers of particles to a larger extent than the corresponding shells on the right. The average excess of particles in these shells, drawn from the center of a given particle, is manifested by the various peaks of g(R).
In the cuboctahedron case, we were able to introduce the large number of the sites to represent each edge between the vertices of the polyhedron using the simple arithmetic mean to generate coordinates of new sites. In contrast, here such an approach is not possible since we want the new points to be everywhere inside the molecule, not only along the bonds. To arrive at approximately uniformly distributed points in the interior of the van der Waals contour of the molecule we select the coordinates of the points at random and then check that indeed the point is inside the molecular interior. In Figure 22 we illustrate distributions of 1000 and 5000 random points that represent a planar model of the H2O molecule (i.e., the projection of H2O on a plane). [Pg.202]

Fig. 9 HNCO spectra of ubiquitin. Top panels show the addition of 0°, 90°, and 30° projections of the two jointly sampled indirect dimensions at a proton chemical shift of 8.14 ppm, reconstructed using back projection reconstruction. Each projection contains 52 complex points thus the total number of complex points sampled from left to right is 52, 104, and 156. The lower panel shows MaxEnt reconstruction using the same number of complex data points, distributed randomly along the nitrogen dimension (constant time) and with an exponentially decreasing sampling density decay rate corresponding to 15 Hz in the carbon dimension. A ID trace at the position of the weakest peak present in the spectrum is shown at the top of each spectrum (indicated by a dashed line). The insets depict the sampling scheme... Fig. 9 HNCO spectra of ubiquitin. Top panels show the addition of 0°, 90°, and 30° projections of the two jointly sampled indirect dimensions at a proton chemical shift of 8.14 ppm, reconstructed using back projection reconstruction. Each projection contains 52 complex points thus the total number of complex points sampled from left to right is 52, 104, and 156. The lower panel shows MaxEnt reconstruction using the same number of complex data points, distributed randomly along the nitrogen dimension (constant time) and with an exponentially decreasing sampling density decay rate corresponding to 15 Hz in the carbon dimension. A ID trace at the position of the weakest peak present in the spectrum is shown at the top of each spectrum (indicated by a dashed line). The insets depict the sampling scheme...

See other pages where Random point distribution is mentioned: [Pg.9]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.785]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.352]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.8 ]




SEARCH



Distribution points

Random distributions

Random points

Randomly distributed

Randomly distributed branching point

Systems with Randomly Distributed Branching Points

© 2024 chempedia.info