Radical Path Combinations

The way to control a radical chain reaction is to control the initiation and termination steps. Radical chain reactions can be favored by adding radical initiators. Likewise, chain reactions can be greatly diminished by adding compounds called inhibitors that react with radicals to increase chain termination. The sensitivity of the radical reaction to radical initiators and inhibitors provides a convenient way to test for this mechanism. 

The first propagation step of the bromination radical chain is significantly endothermic. A small change in product radical stability is reflected in the barrier for reaction and consequently in the rate of reaction. Thus the first propagation step (and the chain reaction) that goes the fastest forms the most stable product radical. Bromination will select for allylic and benzylic tertiary secondary primary vinyl and phenyl. 

Allylic bromination is usually done with A-bromosuccinimide (NBS), which keeps the concentration of bromine low by reacting with the HBr formed in the first propagation step to produce the bromine needed for the second propagation step. This low bromine concentration suppresses the addition chain reaction, discussed next, by allowing time for the addition step to reverse before a bromine molecule is encountered. 

The radical chain dehalogenation with Bu3Sn-H is a very useful reaction. The ease of dehalogenation follows the C-X bond strength I Br Cl F the weakest C-X bond is preferred. The initiator for this reaction is commonly AIBN. An example mechanism involving this reaction is shown in Section 11.7, Approaches to Radical Mechanisms. 

The oxidation radical chain (auto-oxidation) is very important in the spoiling of 

---

Because radicals are in minute concentration, the usual radical mechanisms involve a radical colliding with an even electron molecule in a chain process. A common error is to have a termination step instead of creating a regenerating loop. The three common radical path combinations, Sh2, Adn2, and radical polymerization, all have propagation steps in which radicals collide with an even electron species, creating a new radical. 

Kolbe electrolysis is a powerful method of generating radicals for synthetic applications. These radicals can combine to symmetrical dimers (chap 4), to unsymmetrical coupling products (chap 5), or can be added to double bonds (chap 6) (Eq. 1, path a). The reaction is performed in the laboratory and in the technical scale. Depending on the reaction conditions (electrode material, pH of the electrolyte, current density, additives) and structural parameters of the carboxylates, the intermediate radical can be further oxidized to a carbocation (Eq. 1, path b). The cation can rearrange, undergo fragmentation and subsequently solvolyse or eliminate to products. This path is frequently called non-Kolbe electrolysis. In this way radical and carbenium-ion derived products can be obtained from a wide variety of carboxylic acids. 

A review by Brandt and van Eldik provides insight into the basic kinetic features and mechanistic details of transition metal-catalyzed autoxidation reactions of sulfur(IV) species on the basis of literature data reported up to the early 1990s (78). Earlier results confirmed that these reactions may occur via non-radical, radical and combinations of non-radical and radical mechanisms. More recent studies have shown evidence mainly for the radical mechanisms, although a non-radical, two-electron decomposition was reported for the HgSC>3 complex recently (79). The possiblity of various redox paths combined with protolytic and complex-formation reactions are the sources of manifest complexity in the kinetic characteristics of these systems. Nevertheless, the predominant sulfur containing product is always the sulfate ion. In spite of extensive studies on this topic for well over a century, important aspects of the mechanisms remain to be clarified and the interpretation of some of the reactions is still controversial. Recent studies were... 

By anodic decarboxylation carboxylic acids can be converted simply and in large variety into radicals. The combination of these radicals to form symmetrical dimers or unsymmetrical coupling products is termed Kolbe electrolysis (Scheme 1, path a). The radicals can also be added to double bonds to afford additive monomers or dimers, and in an intramolecular version can lead to five-membered heterocycles and carbocycles (Scheme 1, path b). The intermediate radical can be further oxidized to a carbenium ion (Scheme 1, path c). This oxidation is favored by electron-donating substituents at the a-carbon of the carboxylic acid, a basic electrolyte, graphite as anode material and salt additives, e.g. sodium perchlorate. The carbocations lead to products that are formed by solvolysis, elimination, fragmentation or rearrangement. This pathway of anodic decarboxylation is frequently called nonKolbe electrolysis. 

These two paths combine radicals to give nonradical products. These terminate the radical chain mechanisms discussed in Section 11.6, and so are often undesired but important reactions. 

Chemically mduced dynamic nuclear polarization (cidnp) arises in some radical pair processes and is characterized by intensity inversion and enhancement of some of the resonances in the nmr spectra of radical combination products during a reaction.This provides definitive evidence for the involvement of radicals, but as with ESR, it is difficult to quantitatively estimate the fraction of the total reaction proceeding via the radical path. The conditions under which a cidnp effect will be observed are rather limited, and it has only been observed in a few cases with organometallics. In particular, situations in which a metal-based radical can be implicated are extremely rare. Nevertheless, with quantitative... 

The Use of an Inverse Isotope Effect to Delineate an Enzyme Mechanism D-Amino acid oxidase catalyzes the oxidation of amino acids to imino acids via the transfer of a hydride to the coenzyme flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD). The mechanism first involves deprotonation of the amino acid to create a carbanion (see below). This carbanion can then undergo either a nucleophilic addition to the flavin of FAD (Path A) or an electron transfer to the flavin, creating radicals that combine to give the same product as the nucleophilic addition (Path B). Expulsion of the flavin as a leaving group, concomitant with some proton transfers, gives the oxidized imino acid product. 

The pinacol formation reaction follows a radical mechanism. Benzopinacol, benzophenone and the mixed pinacol are formed jointly with many radical species [72, 74]. In the course of the reaction, first a high-energy excited state is generated with the aid of photons. Thereafter, this excited-state species reacts with a solvent molecule 2-propanol to give two respective radicals. The 2-propanol radical reacts with one molecule of benzophenone (in the ground state, without photon aid) to lengthen the radical chain. By combination of radicals, adducts are formed, including the desired product benzopinacol. Chain termination reactions quench the radicals by other paths. 

The combination of a donor and an acceptor on one cyclopropane ring creates yet another potentially useful reaction path. Finally, cyclopropanes may also be substituted in such a way that they are most easily opened by radical attack. 

The analogy between electron-transfer via addition/elimination (Eq. 2b,c) or abstraction/elimination (Eq. 2a, c) and classical solvolysis involving closed-shell molecules (nonradicals) is seen by comparing Scheme 1 with Scheme 3, in which XY, the precursor of the ions X and Y , is formally derived from the two radicals X and Y". Analogous to Scheme 1, on the way to the ionic products that result from the interaction between X and Y there are two possibilities if XY denotes a transition state, the reaction (Eq. 3a, a ) is a case of outer-sphere electron transfer. If, however, a covalent bond is formed between X and Y, the path (Eq. 3b, b ) is an example of inner- sphere electron transfer. Obviously, part b of the scheme describes the classical area of S l solvolysis reactions (assuming either X or Y to be equal to C) [9, 10]. If a second reaction partner for C (other than the solvent) is allowed for (the (partial) ions then represent transition states), then Eq. 3b also covers Sn2 reactions. If looked upon from the point of view of radical-radical reactivity, Eqs. 3a and b show well-known reactions radical disproportionation in Eq. 3a,a and combination in Eq. 3b. 

Atmospheric molecules such as 02, Os, NO and NOz are inherently reactive because of the free radical nature of their electronic structures. In addition, there are literally hundreds of free radical species produced in the atmosphere via either photochemical or dark reactions of various hydrocarbons [1,2,27]. Clearly, an important prerequisite to laboratory studies of atmospheric chemistry is the ability to generate key free radical species in a clean fashion. Some representative techniques for generating the major free radical reactants, i.e., HO, HOO, R, RO and ROO (R = alkyl or other organic group), in combination with a long path IR absorption cell-chemical reactor are described below. 

The ratio of the retention of aromatic and hydroxyl absorptions after extensive acetone extraction was similar for different compound compositions cured during different time intervals. Thus, it was concluded that BHT fragments were not bound via EPDM macroradical phenoxy radical combination reactions, leaving combination via EPDM macroradicals and benzylic radicals as the most likely reaction path. In conclusion, it was stated that about 25% to 30% of the BHT became chemically bound, which was further supported by results of ageing experiments using cured samples that had been extensively extracted. 

---