Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quenching partners

In accord with the proposed mechanism, copyrolyses of la or lb with 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene (DMB) or isoprene lead to silacyclopentene derivatives via a formal [4+1] cycloaddition of the silylenes (Scheme 2). The simultaneous existence of the silaethenes 2a/2b and the resulting silylenes 4a/4b in the gas phase is proven by the formation of the corresponding 1,3-disilacyclobutanes (5) and - in case of isoprene as the quenching partner - of the two isomeric silacyclohexenes 7 (Scheme 2) [2]. [Pg.119]

Beyer and Lineberger applied this equation to the measured quenching cross sections of the A state of glyoxal by 24 collision partners. In addition to good correlation of the nonpolar molecules, the polar quenching partners are also in agreement with predictions in most cases. [Pg.263]

To render the time scale independent of the absorption and physical quenching of the reaction partners, the concentrations during the reaction were plotted against the loss of ketone, i.e. against [DiPK]... [Pg.71]

Figure 2. Principles of reversible luminescence sensing using photochemical quenching processes (electron, energy or proton transfer). Dye = luminescent indicator Q = quencher species dotted arrow non-radiative deactivation processes. The luminescence intensity (and excited state lifetime) of the indicator dye decreases in the presence of the quencher. The indicator dye is typically supported onto a polymer material in contact with the sample. The quencher may he the analyte itself or a third partner species that interacts with the analyte (see text). Figure 2. Principles of reversible luminescence sensing using photochemical quenching processes (electron, energy or proton transfer). Dye = luminescent indicator Q = quencher species dotted arrow non-radiative deactivation processes. The luminescence intensity (and excited state lifetime) of the indicator dye decreases in the presence of the quencher. The indicator dye is typically supported onto a polymer material in contact with the sample. The quencher may he the analyte itself or a third partner species that interacts with the analyte (see text).
Sometimes the quencher species is not the analyte itself, but a third (non-luminescent) partner, the concentration of which is set by the analyte level. For instance, the pH value (analyte) determines the amount of energy accepting dye that quenches the luminescence from the indicator by an energy transfer process. [Pg.114]

The main feature of such a paramagnetic quenching is that not only an active 02 molecule is formed during this process, but that the second partner, i.e., the aromatic molecule, has also acquired chemical reactivity, having been transformed into the biradical A (triplet). We expect, therefore, that paramagnetic quenching will be accompanied by association or dimerization processes, induced... [Pg.12]

The synthesis of llZ-retinal required the boronic-partner, which was prepared from 2-butyn-l-ol by addition of the tributylstannyl cuprate (83%), followed by protection of the alcohol with tBuMe2SiCl (TBDMSC1) (93%). The tributylstannyl group was substituted with boronic acid in three steps lithiation, quenching alkenyllithium with triisopropyl boronate and hydrolysis to the boronic acid. The Suzuki coupling of the C 6 tetraene with the boronic compound was carried out in THF at room temperature, in the presence of a catalytic amount of... [Pg.99]

There are, however, other ways in which excited-state decay can be accelerated by other species, which cannot be classified as reversible chemical reactions. Such processes can be represented generally by (1.12), where a star denotes electronic excitation. The excited state of A is said to be quenched by B. If B is converted into an electronically excited state (B ) during the process, an overall transfer of electronic energy takes place between the excited and unexcited partners of the interaction. [Pg.27]

Direct measurements of rate constants for quenching of donor triplets by various acceptors in flash experiments indicate that the rates never exceed those of diffusion-controlled reactions. Moreover, the rates are roughly inversely proportional to viscosity.143 Consequently, we infer that transfer occurs at a measurable rate only if the two partners are nearest neighbors in solution. [Pg.50]

In an electron transfer reaction two neutral molecules, for example, will form an ion pair if one of the neutrals is electronically excited it will be deactivated, and the overall process may appear as a quenching if the ion pair recombines to return to the neutral ground state partners ... [Pg.68]

The molecules which have reached Ti will now react with a rate constant kr (unimolecular reaction) or [N] (bimolecular reaction with a ground state partner N) in competition with radiative (phosphorescence of rate constant P), non-radiative (A ) deactivations as well as quenching processes ( q[Q]) so that the final reaction quantum yield of the primary process is... [Pg.94]

It is commonly assumed, therefore, that solvent reorganization will dominate electron transfer kinetics and that the reorganization energy in the same medium will be constant within a series of closely related redox partners. With a value of 2.4 kcal/mole for solvent reorganization (as obtained by Rehm and Weller (7) for fluorescence quenching of a series of arenes by substituted anilines in a polar medium) the curve shown in Fig. 2 is obtained. It is clear that substantial solvent-dependent barrier to electron exchange can be encountered. [Pg.243]

The magnitude of the surface dipole. For the system hydrogen-nickel, formula (13) leads to a value of 0.66 D. The experimentally determined value 0.022 D. is therefore a factor of about 30 smaller. This is quite conceivable because (13) has been derived for a diatomic molecule. In our case one of the partners of the bond, the metal, has a very high polarizability, and hence the surface dipole will be quenched to a large extent. The value of the dipole moment calculated from (13), though larger than the experimental value, is still far smaller than that to be expected for a pure ionic bond (fora bond distance of 2 A. fj, = 10 D.). This is one of the reasons for us to think that the contribution of the ionic type M+X to the total bond... [Pg.272]

The first equation, (3.136a), describes the impurity quenching of A and may be considered separately from another one intended for the description of energy accumulation and dissipation at reaction partners, Bs. [Pg.162]


See other pages where Quenching partners is mentioned: [Pg.46]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.168]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.531 ]




SEARCH



Partnering

Partners

© 2024 chempedia.info