Quasirelativistic

Bauschlicher [48] compared a number of approximate approaches for scalar relativistic effects to Douglas-Kroll quasirelativistic CCSD(T) calculations. He found that the ACPF/MTsmall level of theory faithfully reproduces his more rigorous calculations, while the use of non-size extensive approaches like CISD leads to serious errors. For third-row main group systems, studies by the same author [49] indicate that more rigorous approaches may be in order. 

In the present work, correlation consistent basis sets have been developed for the transition metal atoms Y and Hg using small-core quasirelativistic PPs, i.e., the ns and (nA)d valence electrons as well as the outer-core (nA)sp electrons are explicitly included in the calculations. This can greatly reduce the errors due to the PP approximation, and in particular the pseudo-orbitals in the valence region retain some nodal structure. Series of basis sets from double-through quintuple-zeta have been developed and are denoted as cc-pVwZ-PP (correlation consistent polarized valence with pseudopotentials). The methodology used in this work is described in Sec. II, while molecular benchmark calculations on YC, HgH, and Hg2 are given in Sec. III. Lastly, the results are summarized in Sec. IV. 

The relativistic version (RQDO) of the quantum defect orbital formalism has been employed to obtain the wavefunctions required to calculate the radial transition integral. The relativistic quantum defect orbitals corresponding to a state characterized by its experimental energy are the analytical solutions of the quasirelativistic second-order Dirac-like equation [8]... 

Relativistic effects in heavy atoms are most important for inner-shell electrons. In ab initio and DFT calculations these electrons are often treated through relativistic effective core potentials (RECP), also known as pseudopotentials. This approach is sometimes called quasirelativistic, because it accounts for relativity effects in a rather simplified scalar way. The use of pseudopotentials not only takes into account a significant part of the relativistic corrections, but also diminishes the computational cost. 

The quasirelativistic (QR) PP of Hay and Wadt [61] use two-component wave functions, but the Hamiltonian includes the Darwin and mass-velocity terms and omits the spin-orbit effects. The latter are then included via the perturbation operator after the wave functions have been obtained. The advantage of die method is the possibility to calculate quite economically rather large systems. The method is implemented in the commercial system Gaussian 98 It has extensively been applied to calculations of transition-element and actinide systems [62],... 

The non-relativistic PolMe (9) and quasirelativistic NpPolMe (10) basis sets were used in calculations reported in this paper. The size of the [uncontractd/contracted] sets for B, Cu, Ag, and Au is [10.6.4./5.3.2], [16.12.6.4/9.7.3.2], [19.15.9.4/11.9.5.2], and [21.17.11.9/13.11.7.4], respectively. The PolMe basis sets were systematically generated for use in non-relativistic SCF and correlated calculations of electric properties (10, 21). They also proved to be successful in calculations of IP s and EA s (8, 22). Nonrelativistic PolMe basis sets can be used in quasirelativistic calculations in which the Mass-Velocity and Darwin (MVD) terms are considered (23). This follows from the fact that in the MVD approximation one uses the approximate relativistic hamiltonian as an external perturbation with the nonrelativistic wave function as a reference. At the SCF and CASSCF levels one can obtain the MVD quasi-relativistic correction as an expectation value of the MVD operator. In perturbative CASPT2 and CC methods one needs to use the MVD operator as an external perturbation either within the finite field approach or by the analytical derivative schems. The first approach leads to certain numerical accuracy problems. 

---