Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quantitative consequence screening modeling

If the slopes of the absorption/time curves differ considerably, a positive hit is indicated (i.e., an enantioselective lipase-variant has been identified) (16). Figure 5 shows two typical experimental plots, illustrating the presence of a non-selective lipase (top) and a hit (bottom) (16). As a consequence of the crudeness of the test, quantitative evaluation is not possible. Therefore, the hits need to be investigated separately in laboratory-scale reactions and evaluated quantitatively by conventional chiral GC. About 800 plots of this kind can easily be recorded per day. A total of 40 000 lipase-variants were generated by epPCR, saturation mutagenesis, cassette mutagenesis, and DNA shuffling and screened in the model reaction. [Pg.12]

Structure-activity relationship (SAR) and, more generally, stracture-property relationship (SPR) analysis are integral to the rational drag design cycle. Quantitative (QSAR, QSPR) methods assume that biological activity is correlated with chemical structures or properties and that as a consequence activity can be modelled as a function of calculable physiochemical attributes. Such a model for activity prediction could then be used, for instance, to screen candidate lead compounds or to suggest directions for new lead molecules. [Pg.171]


See other pages where Quantitative consequence screening modeling is mentioned: [Pg.277]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.165]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.37 , Pg.38 , Pg.39 , Pg.40 , Pg.41 ]




SEARCH



Consequence modeling

Models quantitative

Quantitation screening

© 2024 chempedia.info