Public Utilities Fortnightly

Cohn, H. B., "The Rationale and Benefits of Regulation", Public Utilities Fortnightly, (October 7, 1976) 71-74. 

Kukin, I. and Nelson, H., Public Utilities Fortnightly, September 23, 1976. 

Fontaine, P. (2005). A new world order. Public Utilities Fortnightly, February. 

Industry observers generally expect the majority of the nuclear power industry to remain heavily unionized after deregulation, as did the U.S. aviation and rail industries. For example. Miller (1998, pg. 27), in an article about the process of plant acquisition, states that Operating non-union is almost never an option for the buyer, since the seller typically has gained workforce and community support by requiring a union-fiiendly transaction. Similarly, Public Utilities Fortnightly associate editor Schuler (1999, pg. 56) states that Nearly all [of the utility vice presidents that he surveyed] recognize the roles of unions in the future employee mix. Thus, unions will undoubtedly continue to be players in the industry. 

Lori A. Burkhart (2002), ERC Reclaims Grid with SMD Rule, Public Utilities Fortnightly, September 1, pp. 36-40. 

Jay Maidment and Geoffrey Rothwell (1998), All Nuclear Power Plants Are Not Created Equal, Public Utilities Fortnightly, April 1, pp. 28-33. 

Christopher S. Miller (1998), Power Plant Acquisitions Workforce Management from the Buyer s Perspective, Public Utilities Fortnightly, December 1, pp. 26-32. 

Joseph F. Schuler, Jr. (1999), Workforce Management Human Resources VPs Speak, Public Utilities Fortnightly, June 15, pp. 56-65. 

Krebs, "What Are You Doing about Atomic Development " pp. 79-81 J. Raymond Dyer, "The Role of the States in the Power Reactor Program," Public Utilities Fortnightly 58 (8 Nov. 1956), 781-788 John H. McCarthy to G. Mennen Williams, 21 June 1956, Box 173, Williams Papers. 

---