Protein dynamics Subject

Stepping outside of the subject of biochemical protein dynamics there is also a healthy literature on the use of sensing using fluorophores. Spectral and lifetime characteristics of fluorophores are dependent on their environment, for example, pH, O2, and Ca2+, these features are a useful tool, particularly in the study of the basic biology of the cell (see for instance Chapter 4). 

This approach yields spectral densities. Although it does not require assumptions about the correlation function and therefore is not subjected to the limitations intrinsic to the model-free approach, obtaining information about protein dynamics by this method is no more straightforward, because it involves a similar problem of the physical (protein-relevant) interpretation of the information encoded in the form of SD, and is complicated by the lack of separation of overall and local motions. To characterize protein dynamics in terms of more palpable parameters, the spectral densities will then have to be analyzed in terms of model-free parameters or specific motional models derived e.g. from molecular dynamics simulations. The SD method can be extremely helpful in situations when no assumption about correlation function of the overall motion can be made (e.g. protein interaction and association, anisotropic overall motion, etc. see e.g. Ref. [39] or, for the determination of the 15N CSA tensor from relaxation data, Ref. [27]). 

This is a subject in which the role of sophisticated theoretical work has been especially crucial aheady, and its importance continues to grow. The most controversial aspect of the subject is the question of whether and how protein vibrations are directly linked to the catalysis of hydrogen tunneling by enzymes. The full nature and value of the theoretical work is not covered in the present article, nor are the evidence and concepts that underlie proposals for the involvement of protein dynamics. It is our intention to follow the present article with a later treatment of the theoretical contributions and the dynamical questions. 

Third, and perhaps in the long run the most important, the frequency with which protein-reactive anti-peptide antibodies can be generated has led to a conceptual and experimental merger between the antibody and protein dynamics problems. The details surrounding these three broad issues form the subject of this paper. 

It is emphasized that revealing the dynamics as well as the structure (or conformation) based on several types of spin-relaxation times is undoubtedly a unique and indispensable means, only available from NMR techniques at ambient temperature of physiological significance. Usually, the structure data themselves are available also from X-ray diffraction studies in a more refined manner. Indeed, better structural data can be obtained at lower temperature by preventing the unnecessary molecular fluctuations, which are major subjects in this chapter, since structural data can be seriously deteriorated for domains where dynamics are predominant even in the 2D or 3D crystalline state or proteoliposome at ambient temperature. It should be also taken into account that the solubilization of membrane proteins in detergents is an alternative means to study structure in solution NMR. However, it is not always able faithfully to mimick the biomembrane environment, because the interface structure is not always the same between the bilayer and detergent system. This typically occurs in the case of PLC-81(1-140) described in Section 4.2.4 and other types of peptide systems. 

UCW = capped water, TW = tethered water (see text), k = force constant for restraining potential (kcal/mol/A2). b Radius (A) of solvation sphere. 1 Numbers of dynamical water molecules within solvation sphere. d Mean and standard error for the forward (i.e. 8-methyl-N5-deazapterin —> 8-methylpterin) and reverse mutation of the electrostatic force field Cutoff for protein-ligand and solvent-ligand interaction all other interactions are subject to a 9 A cutoff. 

---