Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Projective factor

C. Elsasser, M. Brecht and R. Bittl, Pulsed electron-electron double resonance on multinuclear metal clusters Assignment of spin projection factors bsed on the dipolar interaction, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 12606. [Pg.167]

Table 12.6. Factor systems for the point groups D3 and C3v. The projective factor [gr gj appears at the intersection of the row gr with the column gv. As in Table 12.5, read sections I and II for D3, sections I and III for C3v. ... Table 12.6. Factor systems for the point groups D3 and C3v. The projective factor [gr gj appears at the intersection of the row gr with the column gv. As in Table 12.5, read sections I and II for D3, sections I and III for C3v. ...
The character table of 2mm (C2v) is given in Table 14.4, together with the determination of the type of co-representation of 4mm from h 1 (B2) and the projective factors... [Pg.274]

Equation (26) shows that (T(q, R) forms a unitary projective (or multiplier) representation of R j - P(q). Only for non-symmorphic groups with b different from zero (that is, when q lies on the surface of the BZ) are the projective factors exp [ib,.w,] in eq. (26) different from unity. [Pg.400]

My aim has been to give in these tables only the most commonly required information. For character tables for n > 6, Cartesian tensor bases of rank 3, spinor bases, rotation parameters, tables of projective factors, Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, direct product... [Pg.448]

Cranor CW, Christensen DB. 2003. The Asheville Project Factors associated with outcomes of a community pharmacy diabetes care program. / Am Pharm Assoc 43 160. [Pg.484]

The outer-approximation algorithm (Section II.A) took six iterations to identify this solution, with a projection factor, e, of. 05 on the disturbance amplitude. Both vertex and nonvertex constraint maximizers were identified, confirming the need to consider nonvertex maximizers. The variables that contributed nonvertex maximizers were the step switching times (several times) and the measurement lags (once). Robustness was verified with respect to all vertex combinations of uncertain values and a random selection of interior points (ivert = 1, nrand y = 1000). [Pg.378]

Increasing the projection factor to. 1 reduced the number of iterations to generate this solution to three, with a 20% increase in the exce.ss reagent cost. This shows the effectiveness of an increased projection factor in generating an approximate solution more rapidly. The progress of the algorithm on this problem is discussed in more detail in Appendix B, which illustrates the operation of the algorithm more clearly. [Pg.378]

Each steady-state worst-case optimization took about 15 minutes to run (on a SPARC 2). The worst-case combination was minimum rate of reaction with the measurement biases pushing the effective setpoints upward by. 25 pH and the minimum buffering. This was a relatively simple worst-case optimization and no projection factor was used. This vertex worst case was in fact correctly chosen a priori based on physical considerations, and was promptly reidentified in the local phase of the constraint maximization. Most of the optimization time was spent verifying this choice of the worst case by vertex enumeration and random search. [Pg.389]

As already mentioned, the SHG measurements are done in the fundamental (/) and harmonic (h) polarization configuration, starting with the s-polarized fundamental and p-polarized harmonic beams. In that case the projection factor is given by ... [Pg.10]

As to the ground-state configuratiais of the odd-A europium isott s, the predominant part of the wave function in Eu is due to the shell model proton state d5,2> whereas in the strongly deformed - Eu, there is a change to the Nilsson orbital [413 5/2]. The increasing spectroscopic quadmpole monents on each side of N = 82 indicate a positive projection factor in Eq. 5, and thus, for positive deformations. [Pg.371]

Here, the ZFS and magnetic interaction terms in Eq. (25.1) are omitted because it becomes a constant for any specific total spin. Here, the g tensor and hyperfine tensor, a, in Eq. (25.1) are converted into the effective g tensor, g, -, and effective hyperfine tensor. A, respectively. The A,- is given with multiplying a, with projection factor p, as follows ... [Pg.451]

In the case of exchange-coupled dimeric complexes, the projection factors for the isotropic hyperfine coupling (HFC) terms are given as follows [26, 27] ... [Pg.451]

The spin projection factors 7/3 and —4/3 relate the tensors of the coupled system to the local tensors and reflect the orientation of the local spins relative to the system spin, S = Sa -f Sb- Since gjb > 2.0 (y = x, y, z) the (-4/3) factor of gb leads to g values below g = 2.00. " For applied magnetic fields B > 0.05 T the electronic Zeeman interaction in Equation (5) is at least 20 times larger than the hyperfine interactions. Consequently, the expectation value of the electronic spin, , is determined by the electronic Zeeman term, allowing us to replace the spin operator S... [Pg.281]

It is usually difficult to meet the various objectives, mentioned abvove, at the same time, not only since they are interrelated, but also because external factors may influence the objectives in an unexpected way. The development of a new chemical process usually takes several years. In this time external factors may change considerably, which may influence the course of the development project. Factors that may undergo rapid changes include market prices, interest rates, oil prices, and exchange rates of various currencies. [Pg.3]

There were a number of technological reasons that necessitated the projects. Factors, listed in order of importance, were... [Pg.176]

Elsasser C, Brecht M, Bittl R. 2002. Pulsed electron-electron double resonance on mul-tinuclear metal centers assignement of spin projection factors based on the dipolar interaction. JAm Chem Soc 124 12606-12611. [Pg.470]


See other pages where Projective factor is mentioned: [Pg.83]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.507]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.706]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.732]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.36]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.233 , Pg.274 ]




SEARCH



Human Factors Research Project

Project management, success factors

Projections onto factors

Projective factor system

Some Risk Factors in Processes and Projects

© 2024 chempedia.info