Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Product criterion mechanism

Loss of elongation is the most sensitive criterion for aging measurement regardless of mechanism, and it is favored over measurement of tensile loss for cured compounds. In synthetic mbber production (SBR, in particular), viscosity increases with aging and can affect processing if not prevented. [Pg.246]

The Hammond postulate is a valuable criterion of mechanism, because it allows a reasonable transition state structure to be drawn on the basis of knowledge of the reactants and products and of energy differences between the states (i.e., AG and AG°). Throughout this chapter we have located transition states in accordance with the Hammond postulate. [Pg.221]

If sufficient data are available, much more information can be provided when different curves for various percentages of failure are plotted. Where such data are available, reasonable design criteria would be based on some probability for failure, depending on how critical the effects of failure occur. If a large, expensive repair of a complex mechanism would result from the fatigue failure of one product, then a 10 or even 1 % probability of failure would be a more likely design criterion than the 50% suggested above. [Pg.83]

In many cases, a product fails when the material begins to yield plastically. In a few cases, one may tolerate a small dimensional change and permit a static load that exceeds the yield strength. Actual fracture at the ultimate strength of the material would then constitute failure. The criterion for failure may be based on normal or shear stress in either case. Impact, creep and fatigue failures are the most common mode of failures. Other modes of failure include excessive elastic deflection or buckling. The actual failure mechanism may be quite complicated each failure theory is only an attempt to explain the failure mechanism for a given class of materials. In each case a safety factor is employed to eliminate failure. [Pg.293]

In more recent studies, Jacobs, Tompkins and Young [136] examined the rate of evolution of nitrogen from barium azide as a criterion of the rate of photolysis, and have shown the reaction to be more complex than was previously indicated. A mechanism for the photolysis involving the production and reaction of both exci-tons and positive holes has been formulated. [Pg.189]

In both these cases there is an autocatalytic element, i.e. one which is both the product of the reaction and which tends to increase its rate. This is the substance B in the first case and heat in the second. It is this element of feedback that is the source of the interesting behaviour. The first two terms in both of these equations represent the access to the site of reaction, in this case the stirred tank, in accordance with the criterion of actuality. The feasibility of these simple reaction schemes can be established by showing that they can be embedded in a fully reversible mechanism and the simple system recovered by limiting processes that do not violate the laws of thermodynamics or kinetics (for example, the Wegscheider condition). Yablonskii and his coworkers (Bykov et al. 1978,1979a, b, c Yablonskii Bykov 1979 Gol dshtein et al. 1986) have considered a number of simple models from which it is clear that the autocatalytic feature is essential. In the bimolecular surface reaction the autocatalytic role is played by the vacant sites which are indeed the product of the main reaction which releases those previously held by adsorbate and, at the same time, are a positive influence on the rate of reaction. [Pg.283]

The rate law of Equation 2.9 identifies the SN reactions of Figure 2.11 as unimolecular reactions. That is why they are referred to as SN1 reactions. The rate of product formation thus depends only on the concentration of the alkylating agent and not on the concentration of the nucleophile. This is the key experimental criterion for distinguishing the SN1 from the Sn2 mechanism. [Pg.70]

The one-base mechanism is characterized by the retention of the substrate-derived proton in the product (internal retum).30) With this criterion, reactions catalyzed by a-amino-c-caprolactam racemase,323 amino acid racemase of broad specificity from Pseudomonas striata333 have been considered to proceed through the one-base mechanism. However, such internal returns were not observed in the reactions of alanine racemases from K coli B,33) B. stearothermophilus,263 and S. typhirmaium (DadB and /1/r).263 The internal return should not be observed in the two-base mechanism, because the base catalyzing the protonation to the intermediate probably obtains the proton from the solvent. But the failure of the observation of the internal return can be also explained by the single-base mechanism in which exchange of the proton abstracted from the substrate a-carbon with the solvent is much faster than its transfer to the a-carbanion. Therefore, lack of the internal return does not directly indicate the two-base mechanism of the alanine racemase reaction. [Pg.156]

It should be remembered that the classification criterion used above has nothing to do with the fact that the composition of the products may indicate that an atom or group has been transferred between the two metal centers. An inner-sphere mechanism may or may not be accompanied by atom or group transfer, and this may either occur as a consequence of the transition state structure or trivially be due to the fact that the complexes involved are substitution labile, i.e. exchange of ligands between themselves or the environment takes place at a rate faster than that of electron transfer. [Pg.87]

There are four criteria for involvement of free radical processes in toxicity. The first is the detection of the free radical metabolite either with ESR or by its unique reaction product. The second is the in vitro demonstration that free radicals are involved in the biochemical mechanisms of toxicity (i.e., covalent binding, lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress, etc.). In addition, either the third criterion, the common symptom test , i.e., production of similar toxicity by otherwise dissimilar chemicals which produce free radicals with common chemistry or, alternatively, the fourth criterion, the ability to modulate the toxicity through administration of antioxidants or free radical scavengers needs to be met before a toxicity can be considered to be caused by formation of free radicals. In summary three questions must be answered. First, does a... [Pg.321]

The stoichiometry indicates that two protons are liberated per product molecule, and thus highly acidic conditions are finally produced during the conversion. Evident was presented that mechanism 1 is operative in the a-methoxylation reaction and mechanism 2 (Scheme 6) was ruled out on the basis of a base criterion [170]. [Pg.205]


See other pages where Product criterion mechanism is mentioned: [Pg.484]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.661]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.677]    [Pg.880]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.736]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.2247]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.67]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.217 ]




SEARCH



Criterion mechanism

Mechanical criterion

Product criterion

Product mechanical

Production criteria

© 2024 chempedia.info