Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Present-day mass function

Present-day mass function (PDMF) of stars in the galaxy compared to the initial mass function (IMF). PDMF is the number of stars of a given mass in the galaxy today, whereas IMF is the number of stars of a given mass produced in a single episode of star formation. The difference in the two curves at high stellar mass reflects absence of the stars that have exhausted their nuclear fuel and died over galactic history from the PDMF. After Basu and Rana (1992). [Pg.63]

What is the initial mass function (IMF) of stars and how and why is it different from the present day mass function (PDMF) ... [Pg.83]

The IMF is derived locally from the present day mass function (PDMF) which in turn is obtained by counting the Main Sequence stars per interval of magnitude. Then the star counts are transformed into number of stars per pc2 and then a mass-luminosity relation is adopted to pass from the luminosity to the mass. [Pg.219]

Fig. 12.6. Observable baryons in the Universe as a function of time. The curves represent the total mass density in stars (in Af0Mpc-3) from Rudnick et al. (2003) based on a survey of near-infrared selected galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field South, assuming a Salpeter(O.l) IMF. (For a Kennicutt (1983) IMF, the numbers would be approximately halved.) The points with error bars show the cosmic density of H I from DLAs and sub-DLAs at various redshifts, uncorrected for obscuration, while the point at bottom right shows the present-day density of H i clouds determined by Zwaan et al. (2005). The typical H I co-moving volume density corresponds to S2Hi — 0.7 x 10-3 (taking h = 0.65). After Peroux, Dessauges-Zavatsky, D Odorico et al. (2005). Fig. 12.6. Observable baryons in the Universe as a function of time. The curves represent the total mass density in stars (in Af0Mpc-3) from Rudnick et al. (2003) based on a survey of near-infrared selected galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field South, assuming a Salpeter(O.l) IMF. (For a Kennicutt (1983) IMF, the numbers would be approximately halved.) The points with error bars show the cosmic density of H I from DLAs and sub-DLAs at various redshifts, uncorrected for obscuration, while the point at bottom right shows the present-day density of H i clouds determined by Zwaan et al. (2005). The typical H I co-moving volume density corresponds to S2Hi — 0.7 x 10-3 (taking h = 0.65). After Peroux, Dessauges-Zavatsky, D Odorico et al. (2005).
Aristotle s views on the nature of matter made so much sense to people that less obvious views were difficult to accept. One alternative view was the forerunner of our present-day model matter is composed of a finite number of incredibly small but discrete units we call atoms. This model was advanced by several Greek philosophers, including Democritus (460—370 B.c.), who coined the term atom from the Greek phrase a tomos, which means not cut or that which is indivisible. According to the atomic model of Democritus, the texmre, mass, and color of a material were a function of the texture, mass, and color of its atoms, as illustrated in Figure 3.2. So compelling was Aristotle s reputation, however, that the atomic model would not reappear for 2000 years. [Pg.76]

Because the continental sedimentary mass accounts for the bulk of the present-day global sediments, the growth of the global sedimentary mass should be a function of the growth of the... [Pg.3844]

Due to the variations associated with manufacturing process, it is not possible to attain the theoretical dimensions in a repetitive manner it is accepted that there will be a certain amount of variation in terms of manufacturing geometry and dimensions. It causes a degradatimi of characteristics of the product. In order to ensure the interchangeability (interchangeability of manufactured parts is a critical element of present-day production — mass productirai, mass customization, modular product, maintenance, etc.), the desired behavior, and the functional requirements of the product in spite of variatirais, the part features are assigned a tolerance zone within which the value of the feature, i.e., situation and intrinsic, lies (Weill et al. 1988 Bjorke 1989). [Pg.1230]

In this last chapter the technique of thermogravimetry will be treated, by no means the least of the thermal analysis techniques. The principles of the technique are illustrated in Fig. 7.1 in the upper right-hand comer. The sample, indicated by number 3, is kept in a controlled furnace, 2, whose temperature is monitored by the thermocouple, 4, via the millivoltmeter, 5. The balance, 1, allows continuous mass determination. The present-day unit of mass, the kilogram, has been described in Fig. 2.17. A plot of mass as a function of temperature, T, or time, t, represents the essential thermogravimetry result. [Pg.371]

In the early days of polymer science, when polystyrene became a commercial product, insolubility was sometimes observed which was not expected from the functionality of this monomer. Staudinger and Heuer [2] could show that this insolubility was due to small amounts of tetrafunctional divinylbenzene present in styrene as an impurity from its synthesis. As little as 0.02 mass % is sufficient to make polystyrene of a molecular mass of 2001000 insoluble [3]. This knowledge and the limitations of the technical processing of insoluble and non-fusible polymers as compared with linear or branched polymers explains why, over many years, research on the polymerization of crosslinking monomers alone or the copolymerization of bifunctional monomers with large fractions of crosslinking monomers was scarcely studied. [Pg.139]

The relative importance of these sources of OH and H02 radicals depends on the species present in the air mass, and hence on location and time of day. Figure 1.5, for example, shows the relative contributions as a function of time of day of three sources of OH/H02 in an urban air mass. In this case, nitrous acid is predicted to be the major OH source in the early morning hours, HCHO in mid-morning, and 03 later in the day when its concentration has built up significantly (Winer, 1985 Winer and Biermann, 1994). [Pg.7]


See other pages where Present-day mass function is mentioned: [Pg.236]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.1595]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.1483]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.872]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.2421]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.1350]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.98]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.236 ]




SEARCH



Mass function

Present day

© 2024 chempedia.info