Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Prediction of Aqueous Solubility

Aqueous solubility is selected to demonstrate the E-state application in QSPR studies. Huuskonen et al. modeled the aqueous solubihty of 734 diverse organic compounds with multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) approaches [27]. The set of structural descriptors comprised 31 E-state atomic indices, and three indicator variables for pyridine, ahphatic hydrocarbons and aromatic hydrocarbons, respectively. The dataset of734 chemicals was divided into a training set ( =675), a vahdation set (n=38) and a test set (n=21). A comparison of the MLR results (training, r =0.94, s=0.58 vahdation r =0.84, s=0.67 test, r =0.80, s=0.87) and the ANN results (training, r =0.96, s=0.51 vahdation r =0.85, s=0.62 tesL r =0.84, s=0.75) indicates a smah improvement for the neural network model with five hidden neurons. These QSPR models may be used for a fast and rehable computahon of the aqueous solubihty for diverse orgarhc compounds. [Pg.93]


An extensive series of studies for the prediction of aqueous solubility has been reported in the literature, as summarized by Lipinski et al. [15] and jorgensen and Duffy [16]. These methods can be categorized into three types 1 correlation of solubility with experimentally determined physicochemical properties such as melting point and molecular volume 2) estimation of solubility by group contribution methods and 3) correlation of solubility with descriptors derived from the molecular structure by computational methods. The third approach has been proven to be particularly successful for the prediction of solubility because it does not need experimental descriptors and can therefore be applied to collections of virtual compounds also. [Pg.495]

Lobell M and Sivarajah V. In silico prediction of aqueous solubility, human plasma protein binding and volume of distribution of compounds from calculated pKa and AlogP98 values. Mol Divers 2003 7 69-87. [Pg.509]

Livingstone, D. J., Ford, M. G., Huuskonen, J. J., Salt, D. W. Simultaneous prediction of aqueous solubility and octanol/water partition coefficient based on descriptors derived from molecular structure. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2001, 15, 741-752. [Pg.45]

Huuskonen, J., Rantanen, J., Livingstone, D. Prediction of aqueous solubility for a diverse set of organic compounds based on atom-type electrotopological state indices. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 35, 1081-1088. [Pg.107]

Dearden,. C In silica prediction of aqueous solubility. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2006, 1, 31-52. [Pg.308]

Klamt, A., Eckert, F., Homig, M., Beck, M., Burger, T. Prediction of aqueous solubility of drugs and pesticides with COSMO-RSJ. Comp. Chem. 2002, 23, 275-281. [Pg.309]

McElroy, N. R., Jurs, P. C. Prediction of aqueous solubility of heteroatom-containing organic compounds from molecular structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sd. 2001, 41,1237-1247. [Pg.310]

S. Prediction of aqueous solubility of organic compounds using a quantitative structure-property relationship. J. Pharm. Sd. 2002, 91,1838-1852. [Pg.310]

Nirmalakhandan, N. N., Speece, R. E. (1988a) Prediction of aqueous solubility of organic chemicals based on molecular structure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 22, 328-338. [Pg.56]

Wame, M., St. J., Connell, D. W., Hawker, D. W. (1990) Prediction of aqueous solubility and the octanol-water partition coefficient for lipophilic organic compounds using molecular descriptors and physicochemical properties. Chemosphere 16, 109-116. [Pg.58]

S. R. Johnson, X. Q. Chen, D. Murphy, O. Gudmundsson, Computational models for the prediction of aqueous solubility that include crystal packing, solvation, and ionization, 232nd ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA, United States, Sept. 10-14, 2006, COMP-321. [Pg.465]

Cheng, A. and Merz, K.M. Jr. Prediction of aqueous solubility of a diverse set of compounds using quantitative stmcture-property relationships. /. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3572-3580. [Pg.427]

Engkvist, O. and Wrede, P. High throughput, in silico prediction of aqueous solubility based on one- and two-dimensional descriptors./. Chem. Inf Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1247-1249. [Pg.428]

Wegner, J.K. and Zell, A. Prediction of aqueous solubility and partition coefEcient optimized by a genetic algorithm based descriptor selection method. /. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1077-1084. [Pg.428]

Votano, J.R., Parham, M., Hall, L.H., Kier, L.B., Hall, L.M. Prediction of aqueous solubility based on large datasets using several QSPR models utilizing topological structure representation. Chem. Biodivers. 2004, 1, 1829-41. [Pg.125]

Johnson, S.R. and Zheng, W. (2006) Recent progress in the computational prediction of aqueous solubility and absorption. AAPS Journal, 8, E27-E30. [Pg.142]


See other pages where Prediction of Aqueous Solubility is mentioned: [Pg.497]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.588]   


SEARCH



Aqueous prediction

Solubility predicting

Solubility prediction

Solubility, aqueous

© 2024 chempedia.info