PPDS package

From within the main PPDS package, for specified values of P and T, properties (i)-(xii) can be retrieved and values for properties (xiii) and (xiv), the viscosity and thermal conductivity, are available for most of the fluids these transport properties are thermodynamically consistent with the equilibrium properties because the same density is used for the calculation of both. Individual equations of state can be purchased separately from which all the properties listed above can be calculated. 

As shown in the last section, Hamiltonian and overlap matrix elements are expressed in terms of PPDs. A practical VB package highly depends on an efficient routine for the evaluation of a PPD. Although a PPD may be expressed in terms of sub-PPDs of any given order and their complementary minors, in the present version of Xiamen-99, an algorithm of 2x(V-2) expansion is used. This is because the 1-e and 2-e electron integrals may be built as effective 2x2 PPDs. 

A procedure for the evaluation involves two parts one being the numerical operations of matrix elements, the other being the index operations of the sub-PPDs. It is obvious that the index operation is independent of the system that is being studied. To save CPU time in VB applications, all index operations are pre-computed and stored in the file that accompanies the source code of the package. In addition, all sub-PPDs that are required in the evaluation are computed first and are labeled. This will enable one to avoid repeated computations of sub-PPDs and minimize the computational effort in the calculation. 

As mentioned in Section 1, in a traditional VB treatment, a VB wavefunction is expressed as the linear combination of 2m Slater determinants, where m is the number of covalent bonds in the system. For some applications in which only a few bonds are involved in the reaction, it is too luxurious to adopt the PPD algorithm, as the number of Slater determinants is still not too large to deal with. It would be more efficient to use a traditional Slater determinant expansion algorithm than the PPD algorithm. Therefore, as a complement, a Slater determinant expansion algorithm is also implemented in the package. 

ABSTRACT Any human activity is influenced by the working environment in which it is developed. The opinion of employees is, nowadays, an important factor to consider because their perception may be related to their behavior. The satisfaction of all individuals housed in a thermal environment is an almost impossible task because a thermally comfortable environment for one person may be uncomfortable for another. Therefore, it would be ideal to create a thermal environment that satisfied the largest number of workers. As such, the evaluation of thermal comfort implies a certain degree of subjectivity and requires the analysis of two aspects physical (thermal environment) and subjective (state of mind of the individual). This study aims to analyze the pattern of thermal sensation of a packaging section of quick-frozen desalted codfish, discover the location of the most vulnerable workstations to thermal stress and assess the real thermal sensation of workers. The data were collected using a measurement instrument named Center 317—temperature humidity meter . For the analysis of thermal sensation the follow indexes were applied Temperature Humidity Index (THI), Thermal Comfort Scale (EsConTer) and Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied (PPD). A set of standards were created for each variable and the results obtained indicate the most vulnerable workstations. Intervention strategies were considered. 

The PPD index was applied to discover the percentage of unsatisfied workstations in the packaging section. The observation of Figure 6 shows that in case of packaging. A thermal discomfort is less that in case of packaging B, because in first case only 44% of workers are thermally uncomfortable and in second case 70% of workers are thermally uncomfortable. This means that different situations of packaging show different thermal sensations. 

The PPDS system also provides for several special packages for treating fluids which either have a more accurate representation or which cannot be treated by the methods described above. There are four of these packages, which are detailed in the following sections. 

There is also another small group of important fluids for which there is a large body of experimental data. lUPAC has set up the Thermodynamic Tables Project Centre at Imperial College, London, UK, which has published a number of monographs setting out recommended values for some 14 fluids. These formulations have been internationally approved and are accompanied by recommended formulations, which have been encoded by the lUPAC Thermodynamics Tables Project Centre and are included in the PPDS system. Table 17.11 gives the names of the fluids covered by this package. 

The PPDS refrigerant package evaluates thermodynamic and transport properties of selected refrigerants and is based on the recommendations produced by the International Institute of Refrigeration (HR). Table 17.12 lists the refrigerants covered. 

Table 17.12. Substances included in the PPDS refrigerant package.

No matter what size of pure component databank is available to the PPDS system, there is always the case that information is required for a substance which is not present. Usually there is not very much experimental information available for the component under investigation. The PPDS system has a powerful utility package called LOADER-2 which allows a data record to be created for any component and subsequently used by the main program. The following sections describe the principles behind the program. 

---