Potential probe methods

Resistivity Measurements. The measurements by the Cornell group have all been made on single crystals by a potential-probe method, the details of which have been reported (32). Typical results are presented graphically in Figure 3. 

A potentially general method of identifying a probe is, first, to purify a protein of interest by chromatography (qv) or electrophoresis. Then a partial amino acid sequence of the protein is deterrnined chemically (see Amino acids). The amino acid sequence is used to predict likely short DNA sequences which direct the synthesis of the protein sequence. Because the genetic code uses redundant codons to direct the synthesis of some amino acids, the predicted probe is unlikely to be unique. The least redundant sequence of 25—30 nucleotides is synthesized chemically as a mixture. The mixed probe is used to screen the Hbrary and the identified clones further screened, either with another probe reverse-translated from the known amino acid sequence or by directly sequencing the clones. Whereas not all recombinant clones encode the protein of interest, reiterative screening allows identification of the correct DNA recombinant. 

Probe methods like particle insertion and test particle methods (29-32) are quite useful for computing chemical potentials of constituent particles in systems with low densities. Test particles are randomly inserted the average Boltzmann factor of the insertion energy yields the free energy. For dense systems these methods work poorly because of the poor statistics obtained. 

The STM method was developed by Binnig and Rohrer, who received the Nobel Prize for their invention. STM is the most mature of the scanning probe methods. A sharp tip (curvature of the order 100 A) is brought close to a surface and a low potential difference (the bias voltage) is applied between sample and tip. 

Despite the enormous impact that scanning probe methods have had on our understanding of reactions at oxide surfaces, both STM and AFM suffer from the lack of chemical specificity. The application of STM-inelastic electron tunneling spectroscopy is a potential solution as it can be used to measure the vibrational spectrum of individual molecules at the surface [69, 70]. 

Recently, there has been much interest in the development and application of multidimensional coherent nonlinear femtosecond techniques for the study of electronic and vibrational dynamics of molecules [1], In such experiments more than two laser pulses have been used [2-4] and the combination of laser pulses in the sample creates a nonlinear polarization, which in turn radiates an electric field. The multiple laser pulses create wave packets of molecular states and establish a definite phase relationship (or coherence) between the different states. The laser pulses can create, manipulate and probe this coherence, which is strongly dependent on the molecular structure, coupling mechanisms and the molecular environment, making the technique a potentially powerful method for studies of large molecules. 

The experimental determination of a potential change across a solid/solid interface is a most difficult task since it means that potential probes have to be placed very near the interface. Electrochemists face a similar problem when they study electrode kinetics, but the handling of fluids in this respect is much easier. Nevertheless, we will exploit their concepts and methods to some extent in what follows. 

Fig. 6. Conductivity methods, a) guard ring techniques, b) potential probe technique...

Both alternating and direct current techniques can be used (see also impedance spectroscopy), but the electrode polarization effects should be minimized or taken into account in all cases. For this goal, a four-electrode method where the potential probes are placed between current probes, is often used. 

In this method, two saturated calomel reference electrodes (SCEs) are used as the potential probes, Pt gauze is used for both current probes, and 1 M H2S04 is the electrolyte. Figure 5.14 shows the schematic of the hardware and instruments in this method. 

Electrical resistivity was measured by a d.c. method using four-probe techniques to avoid problems arising from contact resistance. Pressure contacts were used for both current and potential probes. At low temperatures, the current contacts could be improved by ultrasonically tinning the ends of the samples. 

The electrical conductivity(<, carrier concentration(n) and Hall mobility(/i ) were measured at 300 Kfor the p and n-type sintered PbTe. The characterization of the p-n jimction was conducted at 300 K by measuring thermoelectromotive force within temperature difference of 5 K, and voltage (electric potential) distribution using 4-probe method and current(])-voltage(V) relationship in forward and reverse bias. 

From this discussion we have seen that the main pattern-forming variable is the potential. Furthermore, the dynamics are crucially determined by transport processes and cell geometry. Consequently, experimental studies rely on the availability of methods that do not interfere with transport processes. Ideally, they probe the potential distribution in the electrolyte close to the electrode or the double-layer potential. To date, three methods have been employed in the study of patterns in electrochemistry potential probe measurements, surface plasmon microscopy, and visible light microscopy. 

To measure the surface resistivity of paper, a variant of a four-point probe method proposed by Cronch 15 was used. This approach has proven to be reliable, avoiding the effects of contact resistance by employing an electrostatic voltmeter (utilizing contactless probes) to measure the surface potential of paper subject to a constant current. 

Second, channel potential measurements by Kelvin probe force microscopy and the four-probe method, which are described later in this chapter, indicate that the contact resistances and temperature dependences associated with the individual source and drain electrodes are nearly identical. From a thermionic emission... 

---