Electronic states potential energy surfaces

Figure 4.1 shows a schematic of relative energy in theF( P) + H2(j = 0) reaction. Due to the spin-orbit interaction, the fluorine atom degenerate ground electronic state F( P) is split into two states the spin-orbit ground state F( P3/2> and the spin-orbit excited state F ( Pj/2), respectively. As shown in Fig. 4.1, on the three adiabatic potential energy surfaces, electronic states l A and l A"... 

In the previous sections it has been implicitly assumed that the unimolecular reaction is electronically adiabatic and, thus, occurs on a single potential energy surface. Electronically excited states (i.e., multiple potential energy surfaces) for unimolecular reactions was discussed in chapter 3 and it is assumed that the reader has read and is familiar with this material (Nikitin, 1974 Hirst, 1985 Steinfeld et al., 1989). Transitions between electronic states are particularly important for the unimolecular decomposition of ions. For example, the following two dissociation paths ... 

FIGURE 2 Portions of two potential energy surfaces exhibiting a conical intersection. Ua is the potential energy for electronic state a. 

There are significant differences between tliese two types of reactions as far as how they are treated experimentally and theoretically. Photodissociation typically involves excitation to an excited electronic state, whereas bimolecular reactions often occur on the ground-state potential energy surface for a reaction. In addition, the initial conditions are very different. In bimolecular collisions one has no control over the reactant orbital angular momentum (impact parameter), whereas m photodissociation one can start with cold molecules with total angular momentum 0. Nonetheless, many theoretical constructs and experimental methods can be applied to both types of reactions, and from the point of view of this chapter their similarities are more important than their differences. 

Wliat is left to understand about this reaction One key remaining issue is the possible role of otiier electronic surfaces. The discussion so far has assumed that the entire reaction takes place on a single Bom-Oppenlieimer potential energy surface. Flowever, three potential energy surfaces result from the mteraction between an F atom and FI,. The spin-orbit splitting between the - 12 and Pi/2 states of a free F atom is 404 cm When... 

State I ) m the electronic ground state. In principle, other possibilities may also be conceived for the preparation step, as discussed in section A3.13.1, section A3.13.2 and section A3.13.3. In order to detemiine superposition coefficients within a realistic experimental set-up using irradiation, the following questions need to be answered (1) Wliat are the eigenstates (2) What are the electric dipole transition matrix elements (3) What is the orientation of the molecule with respect to the laboratory fixed (Imearly or circularly) polarized electric field vector of the radiation The first question requires knowledge of the potential energy surface, or... 

In many instances tire adiabatic ET rate expression overestimates tire rate by a considerable amount. In some circumstances simply fonning tire tire activated state geometry in tire encounter complex does not lead to ET. This situation arises when tire donor and acceptor groups are very weakly coupled electronically, and tire reaction is said to be nonadiabatic. As tire geometry of tire system fluctuates, tire species do not move on tire lowest potential energy surface from reactants to products. That is, fluctuations into activated complex geometries can occur millions of times prior to a productive electron transfer event. 

Finally, in brief, we demonstrate the influence of the upper adiabatic electronic state(s) on the ground state due to the presence of a Cl between two or more than two adiabatic potential energy surfaces. Considering the HLH phase, we present the extended BO equations for a quasi-JT model and for an A -1- B2 type reactive system, that is, the geometric phase (GP) effect has been inhoduced either by including a vector potential in the system Hamiltonian or... 

In this chapter, we look at the techniques known as direct, or on-the-fly, molecular dynamics and their application to non-adiabatic processes in photochemistry. In contrast to standard techniques that require a predefined potential energy surface (PES) over which the nuclei move, the PES is provided here by explicit evaluation of the electronic wave function for the states of interest. This makes the method very general and powerful, particularly for the study of polyatomic systems where the calculation of a multidimensional potential function is an impossible task. For a recent review of standard non-adiabatic dynamics methods using analytical PES functions see [1]. 

Let S be any simply connected surface in nuclear configuration space, bounded by a closed-loop L. Then, if 4>(r,R) changes sign when transported adiabatically round L, there must be at least one point on S at which (r, R) is discontinuous, implying that its potential energy surface intersects that of another electronic state. 

Figure 3. Low-energy vibronic spectrum in a. 11 electronic state of a linear triatomic molecule, computed for various values of the Renner parameter e and spin-orbit constant Aso (in cm ). The spectrum shown in the center of figure (e = —0.17, A o = —37cm ) corresponds to the A TT state of NCN [28,29]. The zero on the energy scale represents the minimum of the potential energy surface. Solid lines A = 0 vibronic levels dashed lines K = levels dash-dotted lines K = 1 levels dotted lines = 3 levels. Spin-vibronic levels are denoted by the value of the corresponding quantum number P P = Af - - E note that E is in this case spin quantum number),...

---