Polymerization polynomials

Figure 3.3 Cumulative ( ) and instantaneous ( ) initiator efficiency (/) of AIBN as initiator in S polymerization (50% v/v toluene, 70 °C) as a function of monomer conversion (lines are a polynomial fit to the datapoints).1,32...

Figure 1.14 shows time to achieve a given complex viscosity as a function of polymerization temperature. These curves are fitted with a quadratic equation (second-order polynomial). 

A differentiation of the Arrhenius-plot from Fig. 18 by means of spline polynomials gives the second term of the activation enthalpy (31), whereas its first term can be calculated in the way shown in Section 3.1. The results are given in Fig. 20 for three typical degrees of polymerization. The full lines show the temperature-dependence of the activation enthalpy (31), whereas the dashed lines show the corresponding reversible contributions (10a), as predicted by Casper s approximation ( q = 0, v = 1, a = 1) of Eq. (19) of the PDC-calibration curves. The dependence of AH on the degree of polymerization P at two typical column temperatures is shown in Fig. 21 where also the P-dependence of the corresponding activation entropies (33) is plotted for comparison (dashed lines). 

Photoisomerization was studied from a purely photochemical point of view in which photo-orientation effects can be disregarded. While this feature can be true in low viscosity solutions where photo-induced molecular orientation can be overcome by molecular rotational diffusion, in polymeric environments, especially in thin solid film configurations, spontaneous molecular mobility can be strongly hindered and photo-orientation effects arc appreciable. The theory that coupled photoisomerization and photo-orientation processes was also recently developed, based on the formalism of Legendre Polynomials, and more recent further theoretical developments have helped quantify coupled photoisomerization and photo-orientation processes in films of polymer. 

The analyses were performed on a Polymer Lab apparatus, equipped with five ultraStyragel Waters columns (in the order 1000, 500, 10000,100, and 100000 A pore size) attached in series, using a Polymer Lab differential reffactometer. The solvent was THF or CHCI3, the flow rate was 1 mL/min, and 60 microliters of polymeric solution (15 mg/ml) were injected. Normally 50 fractions of 0.2 mL were collected. In the case of sanq)le M30, four different fractionation experiments were performed, and 50 fractions of 0.2 mL, 25 fractions of 0.4 mL, 15 fractions of 0.8 mL, 15 fractions of 1 mL were collected The chromatogram was calibrated using the result of the analysis of MALDI-TOF spectra of selected fractions (see Tables 1 and 2). The average molar masses (Mn and Mw) of the copolymer were measured using the Cahber software distributed by Polymer Lab. The type of calibration selected by us was a narrow standards the calibration function was polynomial of order 1 and the calculation method was area based. ... 

For example, a cubic equation of state can make a positive x intercept in the pressure-temperature diagram. Such an isochor or phase boundary envelope can imply an existence of negative pressure. But time and again it turns out that, at very low temperatures, no equation of state is available that depicts real substances well. So the positive x intercept has to be interpreted as an incorrect description of the cubic equation of state. Experimental data is needed to define the envelope of applicability of the contours predicted by equations of state or phase boundaries developed from sound theories. An example of such an envelope is shown in Figure 2.2 as the dotted-line contours of AV = 0 for the polymeric system. The isotherms at zero pressure can be noted in equations of states, EOS, that are polynomials of higher order. 

---