Polymerization fluorene-based monomer

Dynamic polymeric systems utilizing the C=N exchange reaction have been reported by Lehn s group. They have suggested a polymerization system consisting of a fluorene-based dialdehyde monomer 4, cyclohexane diamine 5, and fluorene-based diamine 6 as a comonomer (Scheme 8.2) [20,21]. In principle, a 1 1 1 mixture of all monomers in ethanol was expected to yield the two-component polymers 7 and 8 together with all component-mixed polymers. However, polymer 7 was dominantly yielded (80%) due to the nucleophilicity of diamines. The nucleophilic-ity of aliphatic diaminocyclohexane is much higher than that of aromatic... 

Though both Suzuki and Stille reactions have been widely used to prepare conjugated polymers (including D-A copolymers), there are some subtle issues to consider when it comes to choose which reaction to use. For example, it is worth noting that the electron richness of stannyl aromatics decides whether these monomers are suitable for Stille-based polymerization or not. Mechanistically, relatively electron-rich thiophenes undergo the transmetalation step more readily than stannylbenzenes. Thus, stannylbenzenes experience low reactivity under Stille reaction conditions. Correspondingly, most thiophene-based aromatics are polymerized via Stille reactions, whereas a Suzuki reaction is a better option for benzene-based compounds. For example, fluorene and carbazole based polymers are usually prepared by Suzuki reaction, whereas polymers with cyclo-penta[2,l- ) 3,4-6 ]dithiophene, silolo[3,2- 4,5- ) ]dithiophene or benzo[l,2- 4,5-i Jdithiophene are often polymerized via Stille reaction. Due to its broader utilization over the Suzuki reaction in preparing D-A copolymers, Stille reaction-based polymerization will be the focus of this chapter, with a brief discussion on the Suzuki-based polymerization also included (Section 15.2.3). 

---