Polymerization covalent

A.luminum Hydride. Aluminum hydride is a relatively unstable polymeric covalent hydride that received considerable attention in the mid-1960s because of its potential as a high energy additive to soHd rocket propellants. The projected uses, including aluminum plating, never materialized, and in spite of intense research and development, commercial manufacture has not been undertaken. The synthetic methods developed were cosdy, eg. 

There are three anions that may loosely claim to be nitrides. Pentazolides (salts of cyclic N ) will all be explosive. Some azides (salts of N3) fall just short of being explosive but all are violently unstable. The true nitrides, nominal derivatives of N3-, are more various. In addition to some ionic structures, there are polymeric covalent examples, and some monomeric covalent ones, while most of those of transition metals are best considered as alloys. Several are endothermic and explosive, almost all are thermodynamically very unstable in air with respect to the oxide. Many are therefore pyrophoric if finely divided and also may react violently with water and, more particularly, acids, especially oxidising acids. A few are of considerable kinetic stability in these circumstances. There is no very clear classification of probable safety by position in the periodic table but polymeric and alloy structures are in general the more stable. Individual nitrides having entries ... 

Metals, intermetallic compounds, and alloys generally react with hydrogen and form mainly solid metal-hydrogen compounds (MH ). Hydrides exist as ionic, polymeric covalent, volatile covalent and metallic hydrides. Hydrogen reacts at elevated temperatrrres with many transition metals and their alloys to form hydrides. Many of the MH show large deviations from ideal stoichiometry (n= 1, 2, 3) and can exist as multiphase systems. 

Metals, intermetallic compounds and alloys generally react with hydrogen and form mainly solid metal-hydrogen compounds. Hydrides exist as ionic, polymeric covalent, volatile covalent and metallic hydrides. 

There is an ill-defined boundary between molecular and polymeric covalent substances. It is often possible to recognise discrete molecules in a solid-state structure, but closer scrutiny may reveal intermolecular attractions which are rather stronger than would be consistent with Van der Waals interactions. For example, in crystalline iodine each I atom has as its nearest neighbour another I atom at a distance of 272 pm, a little longer than the I-I distance in the gas-phase molecule (267 pm). However, each I atom has two next-nearest neighbours at 350 and 397 pm. The Van der Waals radius of the I atom is about 215 pm at 430 pm, the optimum balance is struck between the London attraction between two I atoms and their mutual repulsion, in the absence of any other source of bonding. There is therefore some reason to believe that the intermolecular interaction amounts to a degree of polymerisation, and the structure can be viewed as a two-dimensional layer lattice. The shortest I-I distance between layers is 427 pm, consistent with the Van der Waals radius. Elemental iodine behaves in most respects - in its volatility and solubility, for example - as a molecular solid, but it does exhibit incipient metallic properties. 

We now turn to the 3d series elements. The dihalides and trihalides can be treated as ionic solids, although the chlorides, bromides and iodides adopt layer structures which might be better viewed as polymeric covalent crystals. In Fig. 5.2 the third ionisation energies of the 3d atoms are plotted alongside those of the lanthanides. These all involve the removal of an electron from a 3d orbital from Fe onwards, the orbital concerned is doubly occupied so that spin-pairing energy assists the ionisation. This accounts for the break between Mn and Fe, as previously discussed (Section 4.3). The increase from Sc to Mn, and from Fe to Zn, is much sharper than the corresponding increases in the lanthanide series. However, the break at the half-filled shell is less abrupt for the 3d series. This explains why the II oxidation state - which is... 

Scheme (3) is by far the most important for Be, and dominates the extensive organometallic chemistry of Mg. The example given of MgCl(CH3)(OEt2) is one of the well-known Grignard reagents, much loved by organic chemists. Crystalline BeO has the wurtzite structure with tetrahedral 4 4 coordination, and can be depicted as a polymeric covalent structure in which both Be and O atoms form two ordinary and two coordinate bonds ... 

Beryllium and magnesium hydrides, BeH2 and MgH2, appear to be polymeric covalent hydrides rather than ionic hydrides as are those formed by the other Group II metals. 

CQ, ) wjt an(j q COvalently bonded together the complex ion also interacts ionically with Ca2+. Such complex ions need not be discrete entities but can form polymeric covalent networks with a net charge, with ionic bonds to cations (e.g. silicates see Topics D6 and F4). Even when only two elements are present, however, bonding may be hard to describe in simple terms. 

A The melting point data are consistent with the transition from ionic +2 and +3 compounds through the polymeric covalent +4 compound to the discrete molecular +5 and +6 compounds, the latter being unstable owing to the steric difficulties of arranging six fluorine atoms around a relatively small metal atom. 

Table 7.6 lists the oxides of the elements of the s- and p-blocks of periods 3-6. There is a general pattern across each period. This is a transition from ionic basic oxides, through polymeric covalent oxides, some being amphoteric and the later ones being acidic, to the molecular acidic oxides of the later groups. Down each group there is a tendency for the oxides to be of similar stoichiometry and to be more basic, less acidic, towards the heavier members. 

---