Polymer living/controlled chain polymerization

Reversible deactivated radical polymerization processes, which have been referred to as living/controlled radical polymerizations, allow for producing polymeric materials with controlled molecular masses, low dispersities, and complex maaomolecular architectures, such as block and comb-like copolymers as well as star-shaped (co)polymers. In addition to nitroxide-mediated polymerization (NMP) ° and atom-transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), ° reversible addition fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization is an attractive new method. " ... 

Out of all the polymerization techniques used to attach polymer brushes, controlled radical polymerization techniques [151] such as NMRP, ATRP, and RAFT have received widespread attention. The growth of living polymer chains from surfaces ensures better control over the molecular weight distribution and the amount of attached polymer as compared to the conventional RP, which suffers from the unwanted bimolecular terminations. 

The preparation of polymer brushes by controlled radical polymerization from appropriately functionalized polymer chains, surfaces or particles by a grafting from approach has recently attracted a lot of attention.742 743 The advantages of growing a polymer brush directly on a surface include well-defined grafts, when the polymerization kinetics exhibit living character, and stability due to covalent attachment of the polymer chains to the surface. Most work has used ATRP or NMP, though papers on the use of RAFT polymerization in this context also have begun to appear. 

Cationic polymerization was considered for many years to be the less appropriate polymerization method for the synthesis of polymers with controlled molecular weights and narrow molecular weight distributions. This behavior was attributed to the inherent instability of the carbocations, which are susceptible to chain transfer, isomerization, and termination reactions [48— 52], The most frequent procedure is the elimination of the cation s /1-proton, which is acidic due to the vicinal positive charge. However, during the last twenty years novel initiation systems have been developed to promote the living cationic polymerization of a wide variety of monomers. 

As is expected from these results, it is very difficult to control the polymerization of monomers other than St, e.g., that of MMA, because of the too small dissociation energy of the chain end of poly(MMA). In fact, the polymerization of MMA in the presence of TEMPO yielded the polymer with constant Mn irrespective of conversion, and the Mw/Mn values are similar to those of conventional polymerizations [216]. The disproportionation of the propagating radical and TEMPO would also make the living radical polymerization of MMA difficult. In contrast, the controlled polymerization of MA, whose propagating radical is a secondary carbon radical,has recentlybeen reported [217]. Poly(MA) with a narrow molecular weight distribution and block copolymers were obtained. 

While in most of the reports on SIP free radical polymerization is utihzed, the restricted synthetic possibihties and lack of control of the polymerization in terms of the achievable variation of the polymer brush architecture limited its use. The alternatives for the preparation of weU-defined brush systems were hving ionic polymerizations. Recently, controlled radical polymerization techniques has been developed and almost immediately apphed in SIP to prepare stracturally weU-de-fined brush systems. This includes living radical polymerization using nitroxide species such as 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidin-l-oxyl (TEMPO) [285], reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization mainly utilizing dithio-carbamates as iniferters (iniferter describes a molecule that functions as an initiator, chain transfer agent and terminator during polymerization) [286], as well as atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) were the free radical is formed by a reversible reduction-oxidation process of added metal complexes [287]. All techniques rely on the principle to drastically reduce the number of free radicals by the formation of a dormant species in equilibrium to an active free radical. By this the characteristic side reactions of free radicals are effectively suppressed. 

---