Polyethylene maximum modulus

However, the ratios of a maximum modulus attained to the crystal modulus for iPP and polyethylene, are very high, 0.971... 

The extensional dynamic storage modulus E and the loss factor tan 8 for a series of linear polyethylene tapes of different draw ratios are shown in Fig. 30(a) and (b). There are two features worthy of particular note. First, the modulus at low temperatures is about 160 GPa, which is about one half of the theoretical modulus and the maximum value obtained from neutron diffraction and other measurements. Secondly, the a and y relaxations are both dearly visible even in the highest draw ratio material, although the magnitude of tan 5 for the y relaxation reduces with increasing draw ratio. 

The work carried out by Kalaprasad and Thomas [34] shows different chemical surface modifications such as alkali, acetic anhydride, stearic acid, permanganate, maleic anhydride, silane, and peroxides improving the interfacial adhesion and compatibility between the fiber and matrix. A polyethylene thermoplastic matrix with sisal and glass hybrid composites was developed. The results showed that in all treatments, tensile strength increased about 10-30% and peroxide treatment showed maximum tensile strength and Young s modulus [34]. 

They also used modified impregnation method to make ceUulose/cellulose nanocomposites. These nanocomposites also showed improved tensile and creep properties over neat CNCs. They then used melt compounding technique to manufacture CNC/poly(Iaclic acid) nanocomposites, where polyethylene glycol (PEG) was used as plasticizer and maleic anhydride (MA) was used as a coupling agent. Composites made with and without plasticizer both showed increase in tensile properties. However, the maximum improvement in tensile properties was observed for composites made without plasticizer. The tensile modulus of these composites for 5 wt% CNCs improved by about 35 %, the tensile strength by about 90 %, and elongation to break by about 35 %. 

To stay below the maximum strain of 0.5 percent, the imposed load cannot exceed 100 psi. Furthermore, if the stress were 50 psi, the value of the initial strain would be 0.0025 in./in. Knowing this, and that the limiting strain at time r, or e, is 0.0050 in./ in. and that the initial modulus is 20,000 psi, we can use Equation 3-3 to determine the apparent modulus of the bar E after creep at time t. Doing this we find that the apparent modulus at time t is 10,000 psi. Taking this value and referring to Table 3-7 or to Figure 3-59, we find that this value of the modulus occurs at a strain of 0.005 at 10,000 hours. Thus, with a load of 50 psi on the bar, accurate predictions of creep deformation can be made for service up to 10,000 hours for this particular polyethylene. 

Although there are limitations in the maximum working temperature due to the comparatively low melting point, the chemical inertness will be a positive advantage and in many applications the relevant temperature range is close to ambient. A further positive advantage of ultra high modulus polyethylene fibres is the comparative simplicity of the fibre process which leads to a low projected cost of manufacture. 

We have reported [66] a limited study of spread polymethyl methacrylates and polyethylene oxide. Figure 12.19 shows the variation in surface tension, shear viscosity and dilational modulus obtained from SQELS data as a function of surface concentration. The viscoelastic moduli both show maximum values at finite values of the surface concentration. As the capillary waves generate oscillatory stress and strain, these are related via the complex dynamic modulus of the surface... 

---