Poly , predicted conformation

Figure 7. Predicted conformation for poly(MDI-EDO) (12). The ethylene glycol unit has the gauche -trans-gauche conformation the fiber repeat is 15.0 A.

The most possible reason may be in the higher free energy of the protein adsorption on PolyPROPYL A materials. Chemisorbed neutral poly(succinimide) of molecular weight 13000 apparently forms a diffuse interface as predicted by theory (see Sect. 2.2). Controversially, a short polyethyleneimine exists on a surface in a more flat conformation exhibiting almost no excluded volume and producing... 

From disaccharide analysis, few authors predict the conformation of the poly a-D galacturonan as well as the role of the charge density [35,36] they determine the persistence length Ip that will allow us to explain the behaviour in solution. 

An illustrative example is the work of Clark et al, on the conformation of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) adsorbed on silica 0). These authors determined bound fractions from magnetic resonance experiments. In one instance they added acetone to an aqueous solution of PVP in order to achieve theta conditions for this polymer. They expected to observe an increase in the bound fraction on the basis of solvency effects as predicted by all modern polymer adsorption theory (2-6), but found exactly the opposite effect. Their explanation was plausible, namely that acetone, with ability to adsorb strongly on silica due to its carbonyl group, would be able to partially displace the polymer by competing for the available surface sites. 

The solution properties of dendrigraft polybutadienes are, as in the previous cases discussed, consistent with a hard sphere morphology. The intrinsic viscosity of arborescent-poly(butadienes) levels off for the G1 and G2 polymers. Additionally, the ratio of the radius of gyration in solution (Rg) to the hydrodynamic radius (Rb) of the molecules decreases from RJRb = 1.4 to 0.8 from G1 to G2. For linear polymer chains with a coiled conformation in solution, a ratio RJRb = 1.48-1.50 is expected. For rigid spheres, in comparison, a limiting value RJRb = 0.775 is predicted. 

Figure 6 shows how the transition of poly(e-carbobenzoxy L-lysine) (PCBL) in m-cresol is affected by the chain length of the sample (23). The trend displayed here is general and conforms to the theoretical prediction deduced from Fig. 1 the transition curve becomes sharper as chain length increases. Comparison with Fig. 5 indicates that in the same solvent, m-cresol, the direction of transition of PCBL is opposite to that of PBLA and the two transitions differ markedly in sharpness. This again illustrates the crucial importance of polymer-solvent interactions in the transitions of polypeptides. 

Empirical conformational energy calculations are performed on helical poly(2,3-quinoxaline)s to predict stable conformations. Two energy minimum conformations are found by varying the dihedral angle, y, between two adjacent quinoxaline units from 5 to 180°. Circular dichroism spectra are calculated for the two stable conformations (v - 45 and 135°) on the basis of exciton theory. 

The characteristic ratios of poly(pro-gly), poly(hyp-gly), poly(gly-gly-pro-gly), poly(gly-gly-hyp-gly), and poly(pro-ale) are determined in water, The results confirm the main features of the theoretical conformational maps derived by Rory and coworkers for glycine followed by either l-proline or a nonproline residue. Small adjustments, well within the uncertainty described by Schimme and Rory, are suggested In the conformational map for L-proline followed by glycine. The constants for the Lennard-Jones functions of Scheraga and coworkers, as used by Madison and Scheliman, produce a conformational map for L-proline followed by a nonproline residue which is in somewhat poorer agreement with experiment. The two sets of modified constants introduced by Madison and Scheliman fall to predict the conformational properties of these sequential copolypeptides. 

Very early examples in this area are the predictions that polyethylene should crystallize in a planar zig-zag conformation, poly(oxymethylene) in a helix having nine repeat units per live turns, some isotactic poly(a-olefins) in helices having three repeat units per single turn, and a number of polypeptides and proteins in the now-famous a-helices. All these predictions, and many others, have been confirmed experimentally.39... 

Intramolecular energy calculations have been made on polygermane chains, so additional information on their conformational preferences is available 43 More specifically, molecular orbital calculations have been carried out as a function of rotations about the backbone bonds. For poly(dimethylgermane), the results predict a broad energy minimum located at the trans conformation, with two symmetrical, steeper and somewhat shallower minima near the usual gauche locations. The results are very similar to those for poly(dimethylsilane), except that the barriers are considerably lower.43 This is apparently due to the fact that Ge-Ge bonds are approximately 0.30 A longer than Si-Si bonds.44 6 Unfortunately, no relevant experimental data might be used to test the validity of the calculations are available at the present time. 

---