Polarized-orbital approximation

In the self-consistent field linear response method [25,46,48] also known as random phase approximation (RPA) [49] or first order polarization propagator approximation [25,46], which is equivalent to the coupled Hartree-Fock theory [50], the reference state is approximated by the Hartree-Fock self-consistent field wavefunction < scf) and the set of operators /i j consists of single excitation and de-excitation operators with respect to orbital rotation operators [51],... 

It is by no means easy to say whether d polarization orbitals are needed in the quantum-chemical description of phosphorus and sulphur compounds. Because of the variational principle, one has to be exceptionally unlucky not to ameliorate an approximate P when introducing a new free parameter. But the question is whether the d polarization orbitals are an essential aspect of the unknown (and somewhat Platonic) true St. This is a very profound question related to the problem whether the natural spin-orbitals (introduced by Lowdin) having occupation numbers closely below 1 are those which define the preponderant configuration. It is now known... 

Several other calculations of the first few partial-wave phase shifts for positron-helium scattering have been carried out using a variety of approximation methods in all cases, however, rather simple uncorrelated helium wave functions have been used. Drachman (1966a, 1968) and McEachran et al. (1977) used the polarized-orbital method, whereas Ho and Fraser (1976) used a formulation based on the static approximation, with the addition of several short-range correlation terms, to determine the s-wave phase shifts only. The only other elaborate variational calculations of the s-wave phase shift were made by Houston and Drachman (1971), who employed the Harris method with a trial wave function similar to that used by Humberston (1973, 1974), see equation (3.77), and with the same helium model HI. Their results were slightly less positive than Humberston s HI values, and are therefore probably less... 

Up to this point, our main concern was to reformulate the results of the LD ligand influence theory in the DMM form. Its main content was the symmetry-based analysis of the possible interplay between two types of perturbation substitution and deformation, controlled by the selection rules incorporated in the polarization propagator of the CLS. The mechanism of this interplay can be simply formulated as follows substitution produces perturbations of different symmetries which are supposed to induce transition densities of the same symmetries. In the frontier orbital approximation, only those densities among all possible ones can actually appear, which have the symmetry which enters into decomposition of the tensor product TH TL to the irreducible representations. These survived transition densities then induce the geometry deformations of the same symmetry. 

Bond orbitals are constructed ft om s/r hybrids for the simple covalent tetrahedral structure energies are written in terms of a eovalent energy V2 and a polar energy K3. There are matrix elements between bond orbitals that broaden the electron levels into bands. In a preliminary study of the bands for perfect crystals, the energies for all bands at k = 0 arc written in terms of matrix elements from the Solid State Tabic. For calculation of other properties, a Bond Orbital Approximation eliminates the need to find the bands themselves and permits the description of bonds in imperfect and noncrystalline solids. Errors in the Bond Orbital Approximation can be corrected by using perturbation theory to construct extended bond orbitals. Two major trends in covalent bonds over the periodic table, polarity and metallicity, arc both defined in terms of parameters from the Solid State Table. This representation of the electronic structure extends to covalent planar and filamentary structures. 

Notice that the gap vanishes for a homopolar semiconductor, which is true also for the exact bands, and if V were equal to V , it would simply be equal to times the predicted band width, p4K,. Thus, qualitatively, the gap is in very simple correspondence with the polarity of the system. The observed splittings are from 30 percent to 45 percent lower than those predicted in the K,-only theory by Eq. (6-12). The value is not modified as we add additional matrix elements within the Bond Orbital Approximation (Pantelides and Harrison, 1975). P rom Eqs. (6-3) and (6-4) we see that the situation is greatly complicated if the Bond Orbital Approximation is not u.scd (that is, bonding antibonding matrix elements are added), though of course the predicted gaps do go to zero as the polarity goes to zero in any case. 

The same effect can be seen in the zig-zag chain of Fig.. 3-11. It is remarkable that we can compute the angular force constant in that model exactly, as well as in the Bond Orbital Approximation (see Problems 8-1 and 8-2). The results turn out to be identical for the homopolar semiconductors, but for polar semiconductors, the exact solution has a, replaced by . Sokel has shown that the result is not so simple for the tetrahedral solid, but turns out quantitatively to be very close to an dependence. We will also find an ot dependence when we treat tetrahedral solids in terms of the chemical grip in Section I9-F. This suggests the approximation to the full calculation,... 

Use these matrix elements to obtain the shift in bond energy to second order in 0. Use this to correct the value of C, obtained in Problem 8-1 for errors arising from the Bond Orbital Approximation. (Notice that = 20.) The finding that there arc only corrections for polar semiconductors carries over to the tetrahedral case. 

---