Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Polarizability models intermolecular interactions, interaction

The stress-optical behaviour of an elastomeric network of PDET is measured over a wide range of elongation ratios and temperatures. Theoretical calculations are carried out with the RIS model. For Act, no reasonable modification of the conformational energies or contributions to the anisotropic part of the polarizability tensor would achieve agreement between theory and experiments. The discrepancy between theoretical and experimental results may be qualitatively explained by intermolecular interactions. Agreement between theory and experiment is only obtained assuming the unlikely value of about + 4.2 kJ mol-1 for E(on). [Pg.276]

Here, a. and a L are the polarizabilities of the diatom parallel and perpendicular to the internuclear separation, R12. The electrostatic theory accounts for the distortions of the local field by the proximity of a point dipole (the polarized collisional partner) and suggests that the anisotropy is given by ft Rn) 6intermolecular interactions). This is the so-called dipole-induced dipole (DID) model, which approximates the induced anisotropy of such diatoms often fairly well. It gives rise to pressure-induced depolarization of scattered light, and to depolarized, collision-induced Raman spectra in general. [Pg.367]

Although many satisfactory VCD studies based on the gas phase simulations have been reported, it may be necessary to account for solvent effects in order to achieve conclusive AC assignments. Currently, there are two approaches to take solvent effects into account. One of them is the implicit solvent model, which treats a solvent as a continuum dielectric environment and does not consider the explicit intermolecular interactions between chiral solute and solvent molecules. The two most used computational methods for the implicit solvent model are the polarizable continuum model (PCM) [93-95] and the conductor-like screening model (COSMO) [96, 97]. In this treatment, geometry optimizations and harmonic frequency calculations are repeated with the inclusion of PCM or COSMO for all the conformers found. Changes in the conformational structures, the relative energies of conformers, and the harmonic frequencies, as well as in the VA and VCD intensities have been reported with the inclusion of the implicit solvent model. The second approach is called the explicit solvent model, which takes the explicit intermolecular interactions into account. The applications of these two approaches, in particular the latter one will be further discussed in Sect. 4.2. [Pg.200]

The induced polarizability is also more complex to model especially for the big polyatomic molecules. Insufficient data concerning the interaction potentials are often a hindrance and make an accurate analysis less certain. To complicate matters even more, the anisotropy of the intermolecular interaction is often insufficiently known, or it is hard to account for even if it is known. [Pg.453]

Theory. If the invariants of the pair polarizability are known, along with a refined model of the intermolecular interaction potential, the lineshapes of binary spectra can be computed quite rigorously [227, 231, 271], Lineshape computations based on exact or approximate classical trajectories are known [196, 264, 276, 316, 337]. Such computations generate spectral functions that are symmetric, g — co) = g((o). For massive pairs at high enough temperatures, such classical profiles are often sufficient at frequency shifts much smaller than the average thermal energy, ha> < kT, albeit special precaution is necessary when the system forms van der Waals dimers [302]. [Pg.454]

Certainly, the discrete SWB model is rather crude. It does not take into account the long-range nature of Coulomb interaction, although it is of great significance for aqueous systems. Moreover, this model does not consider molecules polarizability and other effects related to the non-additivity of intermolecular interaction. Therefore it is quite surprising to observe a close correlation between the theoretical predictions based on the SWB model and contemporary quantum-chemical calculations. Some of the coincidences are listed below. [Pg.306]

The interaction of long-chain molecules such as polymers is a problem area where the nature of polarization response can be a significant concern on its own. An example is from a study of parallel hexatriene molecules carried out to represent a truncated form of solid-state polyacetylene [192]. This smdy included both ab initio calculations and an electrostatic model using polarizability, a, and second hyperpolarizability, y, tensors distributed to the carbon centers. The ab initio calculations on a single hexatriene molecule were used to find the distributed tensors for the electrical analysis. The objective in this smdy was not the interaction energy, but the effect on each molecule s polarizability and hyperpolarizability due to intermolecular interaction. The ab initio evaluations benchmarked the electrostatic model calculations both for... [Pg.30]

These molecule interaction schemes that exclude the intramolecular interactions have, however, to be distinguished from the atom interaction or relay-type models that originally were aimed at determining the molecular polarizabilities from the dipolar interactions between effective atomic polarizabilities and that require additional terms to account for the overlap between the atomic densities and for charge transfer effects [82]. Nevertheless, this approach was recently extended to describe both intra- and intermolecular interactions and, consequently, the corresponding atomic parameters could be used to evaluate the crystal local held factors [83],... [Pg.62]

The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 shortly introduces the exciton model and its approximations. Section 3 reviews calculations of ground state properties (mainly the polarization and polarizability) paying special attention to the mean-field approximation. Push-pull chromophores, the special family of polar and polarizable molecules studied in this contribution, are presented in Section 4, with a brief discussion of their properties in solution and of relevant models. In Section 5 we present a model for interacting push-pull chromophores that will be the basis for the discussion of collective and cooperative effects in relevant materials. Static susceptibilities of clusters of push-pull chromophores are discussed in Section 6, focusing attention on cooperative effects in tlie ground state. Excited state properties are addressed in Section 7, with special emphasis to systems where intermolecular interactions lead to extreme consequences. Section 8 finally summarizes main results. [Pg.255]

In this contribution we discuss mm based on pp chromophores, a very interesting class of molecules for applications in molecular photonics and electronics. Push-pull chromophores are both polar and polarizable and this makes the role of intermolecular interactions particularly important. The toy model we propose for clusters of pp chromophores neglects intermolecular overlap, just accounting for classical electrostatic intermolecular interactions, and describes each pp chromophore based on a two state model. The two-state model for pp chromophores has been discussed and validated via an extensive comparison with the spectroscopic properties of several dyes in solution [74, 75, 90], The emerging picture is safe and led to the definition of a reliable set of molecular parameters for selected dyes. This analysis then offers valuable information to be inserted into models for clusters of interacting chromophores, in a the bottom-up modeling strategy that was nicely exemplified in Ref. [90]. [Pg.279]

The total potential energy of the Drude polarizable model contains the terms representative of the interaction with the static electric field, interaction with other dipoles and the self-energy associated with the Drude oscillators, in addition to the standard contributions representing bonding terms (bonds, angles, dihedrals, etc.) and intermolecular interactions represented by Lennard-Jones (Lj) "6-12" term ... [Pg.198]


See other pages where Polarizability models intermolecular interactions, interaction is mentioned: [Pg.246]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.130]   


SEARCH



Interaction model

Interactive model

Intermolecular interaction

Intermolecular interactions, model

Polarizabilities interaction

Polarizable model

© 2024 chempedia.info