Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Polarizabilities quantum-mechanical measurements

This approach is based on the introduction of molecular effective polarizabilities, i.e. molecular properties which have been modified by the combination of the two different environment effects represented in terms of cavity and reaction fields. In terms of these properties the outcome of quantum mechanical calculations can be directly compared with the outcome of the experimental measurements of the various NLO processes. The explicit expressions reported here refer to the first-order refractometric measurements and to the third-order EFISH processes, but the PCM methodology maps all the other NLO processes such as the electro-optical Kerr effect (OKE), intensity-dependent refractive index (IDRI), and others. More recently, the approach has been extended to the case of linear birefringences such as the Cotton-Mouton [21] and the Kerr effects [22] (see also the contribution to this book specifically devoted to birefringences). [Pg.249]

Two of the hydrophihcity scales in Table 2 were derived from experimental measures of the behavior of amino acids in various solvents, namely partitioning coefficients [K-D index of Kyte and Doolittle (30)] or mobility in paper chromatography [Rf index of Zimmerman et al. (31)]. By contrast, the Hp index was obtained from quantum mechanics (QM) calculations of electron densities of side chain atoms in comparison with water (32). The Hp index is correlated highly with these two established hydrophobicity scales (Table 4). Therefore, like the polarizability index, it is possible to represent fundamental chemical properties of amino acids (hydrophUicity, Hp) with parameters derived from ab initio calculations of electronic properties. However, in contrast to polarizabihty (steric effects), hydrophihcity shows significant correlation with preference for secondary structure. Thus, hydrophobic amino acids prefer fi-strands (and fi-sheet conformations) and typically are buried in protein structures, whereas hydrophilic residues are found commonly in turns (coil structure) at the protein surface. [Pg.21]

The "A" parameter can be obtained from atomic polarizability measurements or can be calculated quantum mechanically. The "B" parameter is typically derived from crystallographic data so as to reproduce observed average contact distances between different kinds of atoms in crystals of various molecules. [Pg.907]

More recently, Fisher information has been studied as an intrinsic accuracy measure for concrete atomic models and densities [43, 44] and also for quantum mechanics central potentials [45]. Also, the concept of phase space Fisher information, where position and momentum variables are included, was analyzed for hydrogenlike atoms and the isotropic harmonic oscillator [46]. The net Fisher information measure is found to correlate well with the inverse of the ionization potential and dipole polarizability [44]. [Pg.420]

Raman spectroscopy also has selection rules. The gross selection rule for a Raman-active vibration is related to the polarizability of the molecule. Polarizability is a measure of how easily an electric field can induce a dipole moment on an atom or molecule. Vibrations that are Raman-active have a changing polarizability during the course of the vibration. Thus, a changing polarizability is what makes a vibration Raman-active. The quantum-mechanical selection rule, in terms of the change in the vibrational quantum number, is based on a transition moment that is similar to the form of M in equation 14.2. For allowed Raman transitions, the transition moment [a] is written in terms of the polarizability a of the molecule ... [Pg.524]

The initial thrust in studying photoemission from metal electrodes into solutions was to confirm the form of the photoemission rate laws at amorphous electrodes. Mercury was the natural choice of substrate because of its wide range of polarizability and its surface integrity. Although the rate measurements agreed well with the quantum mechanical theory of Gurevich et al. (Sections... [Pg.79]

There is very little problem in calculating an acceptable measure of solute size. Simple calculations of either molecular volume or area based on either Bondi s (Bondi, 1964) or McGowan s (Abraham, 1987) methods work almost as well as those derived from molecular mechanics and quantum chemistry (Leo, 1993). When volume in cubic Angstroms is used, V is normally scaled by 0.01 to produce a coefficient comparable to the others in the equation polarity/polarizability. [Pg.112]


See other pages where Polarizabilities quantum-mechanical measurements is mentioned: [Pg.49]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.1418]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.644]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.163]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.43 ]




SEARCH



Mechanical measurement

Mechanical polarizability

Polarizabilities measurements

Quantum measurement

© 2024 chempedia.info