Polarity, acid strength

For the methyl-substituted compounds (322) the increase in AG and AHf values relative to the unsubstituted thiazole is interpreted as being mainly due to polar effects. Electron-donating methyl groups are expected to stabilize the thiazolium ion, that is to decrease its acid strength. From Table 1-51 it may be seen that there is an increase in AG and AH by about 1 kcal mole for each methyl group. Similar effects have been observed for picolines and lutidines (325). 

To explain features of acid strength, we need to look at the effects of bond strength, polarity, and charge. 

Since phenol has an appreciable dipole moment, and no low energy acceptor orbitals, it should interact best with the donors that have the largest lone pair dipole moment — the oxygen compounds. Iodine has no dipole moment and the interaction with iodine is expected to be essentially covalent. Iodine should interact best with the donors that have the lowest ionization potential, i.e., the ones whose charge clouds are most easily polarized. Similar considerations have been employed to explain the donor strengths of primary, secondary and tertiary amines 35a) and the acid strengths of (35b) ICl, Bt2, I2. CeHsOH and SO2. 

Sridharan and Mathai noticed that the transesterification of small esters under acid-catalyzed conditions was retarded by the presence of spectator polar compounds. " Thus, given that water can form water-rich clusters around protons (solvent-proton complexes) with less acid strength than methanol-only proton complexes, some catalyst deactivation may be expected with increased water concentrations. Also, water-rich methanol proton complexes should be less hydrophobic than methanol-only clusters, thus making it more difficult for the catalytic species (H" ) to approach the hydrophobic TG (and possibly DG) molecules and contributing to catalyst deactivation. Therefore, with water present in the feedstock or produced during the reaction in significant quantities, some catalyst deactivation can take place by hydration. 

As with the summaries of the other sections, we mention a number of calculation parameters or variables that have been demonstrated to be of critical importance for accurate prediction of aspects of the interactions. Symmetry constraints on the clusters have been shown to introduce arti-factual behavior. Corrections to account for the correlation of electrons have become essential in a calculation, and they must be incorporated self-consistently rather than as postoptimization corrections. Basis sets need to have the flexibility afforded by double- or triple-zeta functionality and polarization functions to reproduce known parameters most accurately. The choice of the model cluster and its size affect the acid strength, and the cluster must be large enough not to spatially constrain reactants or transition states. The choice of cluster is invariably governed by the available resources, but a small cluster can still perform well. Indeed, some of the... 

Many other linear Gibbs energy relationships have been proposed for example, the acid strengths of aliphatic compounds can be correlated using the "Taft polar substituent constants" o. ... 

The effects of substituents in ortho positions on the reactivity of benzene derivatives do not correlate well with the Hammett equation, as can be seen in Figure 26-3. The problem is that ortho substituents are close enough to the reaction site to exert significant proximity effects, which may be polar as well as steric in origin. Thus the enhanced acid strength of 2-nitrobenzoic acid over the 3- and 4-isomers (see Table 26-4) may be due to a polar stabilization of the acid anion by the neighboring positive nitrogen, which of course is not possible with the 3- and 4-isomers ... 

For binary acids of elements in the same row of the periodic table, changes in the H-A bond strength are smaller, and the polarity of the H-A bond is the most important determinant of acid strength. The strengths of binary acids of the second-row elements, for example, increase as the electronegativity of A increases ... 

As the halogen becomes more electronegative, an increasing amount of electron density shifts from the O-H bond toward the halogen, thus weakening the O-H bond and increasing its polarity. As a result, the proton is more easily transferred to a solvent water molecule, and so the acid strength increases. 

In contrast to the amphoteric Cr(OH)3, chromium(II) hydroxide is a typical basic hydroxide. It dissolves in acid, but not in excess base. Conversely, the chromium(VI) compound, Cr02(0H)2, is a strong acid (chromic acid, H2Cr04). Recall from Section 15.15 that acid strength increases with increasing polarity of the O-H bonds, which increases, in turn, with increasing oxidation number of the chromium atom. 

Zeolite polarity and reaction rate The competition between sulfolane, PA and product molecules for the adsorption on the active protonic sites is sufficient enough to explain the differences in reaction orders and catalyst stability and selectivity between PA transformation in sulfolane and in dodecane. However, the competition for the occupancy of the zeolite micropores plays a significant role as well. This was demonstrated by studying a related reaction the transformation of an equimolar mixture of PA with phenol in sulfolane solvent on a series of H-BEA samples with different framework Si/Al ratios (from 15 to 90).[49] According to the largely accepted next nearest neighbour model,[50,51] the protonic sites of these zeolites should not differ by their acid strength, as furthermore confirmed by the... 

---