Polarisation of ions

In this respect the approach by Ninham and Yaminsky is much easier to use. In principle the influence of solvent structure can be taken into account within the DLVO model by using a convenient Lifshitz-like ansatz. There, all non-electrostatic interactions are taken into account via frequency summations over all electromagnetic interactions that take place in the solutions. If done rigorously, the result should be more or less exact. As a proof of principle, Bostrom and Ninham made a first attempt in this direction. The classical DLVO ansatz was replaced by a modified Poisson-Boitzmann (PB) equation, in which a simplified so-called dispersion term was added to the electrostatic interaction. In this way ion specificity came in quite naturally via the polarisability and the ionisation potential of the ions. However, it turned out that this first-order approximation of the non-electrostatic interactions was not sufficient to predict the Hofineister series of surface tension. Heavier ions such as iodide had to be supposed to have smaller polarisabilities compared to smaller ions such as chloride. Although the exact polarisabilities of ions in water are still under debate, this is not physical. 

The three-body contribution may also be modelled using a term of the form i ( AB,tAc,J Bc) = i A,B,c exp(-Q AB)exp(-/i Ac)exp(-7 Bc) where K, a, j3 and 7 are constants describing the interaction between the atoms A, B and C. Such a functional form has been used in simulations of ion-water systems, where polarisation alone does not exactly model configurations when there are two water molecules close to an ion [Lybrand and Kollman 1985]. The three-body exchange repulsion term is thus only calculated for ion-water-water trimers when the species are close together. 

Fig. 2.3 Distribution of ions during anodic polarisation, showing the arbitrary value used for...

Zembura has made specific use of the rotating disc for investigation of the effect of flow on corrosion reactions. This work has shown that it is possible to determine the type of control (activation or concentration polarisation) of zinc dissolving in 0.1 N Na2S04 (de-aerated), which followed closely the predicted increase in hydrogen ion reduction as the flow rate increased, and proved that in this example... 

The H-type cell devised by Lingane and Laitinen and shown in Fig. 16.9 will be found satisfactory for many purposes a particular feature is the built-in reference electrode. Usually a saturated calomel electrode is employed, but if the presence of chloride ion is harmful a mercury(I) sulphate electrode (Hg/Hg2 S04 in potassium sulphate solution potential ca + 0.40 volts vs S.C.E.) may be used. It is usually designed to contain 10-50 mL of the sample solution in the left-hand compartment, but it can be constructed to accommodate a smaller volume down to 1 -2 mL. To avoid polarisation of the reference electrode the latter should be made of tubing at least 20 mm in diameter, but the dimensions of the solution compartment can be varied over wide limits. The compartments are separated by a cross-member filled with a 4 per cent agar-saturated potassium chloride gel, which is held in position by a medium-porosity sintered Pyrex glass disc (diameter at least 10 mm) placed as near the solution compartment as possible in order to facilitate de-aeration of the test solution. By clamping the cell so that the cross-member is vertical, the molten... 

Throughout we have considered only the portion of the mole refraction produced in the outermost shell. In the case of xenon one finds by our methods that as much as 4 per cent, of the total mole refraction is due to the N shell accordingly our values of SK for the 0 electrons would be decreased by about 0-1 on making this correction. The values of R for ions would in most cases not be changed materially by the explicit consideration of the polarisation of inner shells, and so the less complicated treatment of this paper has been adopted. 

Note In this table all metal ions are in high-spin states and liganding atoms are small O, N donors. S-donors favour lower co-ordination numbers. Ligand-field theory, that is polarisation of and binding by the core electrons and orbitals of the metal ion compounds, can explain the above observations see inorganic chemistry textbooks in Further Reading . 

The model is most vulnerable in the way it accounts for the number of particles that collide with the electrode [50, 115], In the model, the mass transfer of particles to the cathode is considered to be proportional to the mass transfer of ions. This greatly oversimplifies the behavior of particles in the vicinity of an interface. Another difficulty with the model stems from the reduction of the surface-bound ions. Since charge transfer cannot take place across the non-conducting particle-electrolyte interface, reduction is only possible if the ion resides in the inner Helmholtz layer [116]. Therefore, the assumption that a certain fraction of the adsorbed ions has to be reduced, implies that metal has grown around the particle to cover an identical fraction of the surface. Especially for large particles, it is difficult to see how such a particle, embedded over a substantial fraction of its diameter, could return to the plating bath. Moreover, the parameter itr, that determines the position of the codeposition maximum, is an artificial concept. This does not imply that the bend in the polarisation curve that marks the position of itr is illusionary. As will be seen later on, in the case of copper, the bend coincides with the point of zero-charge of the electrode. 

The larger, less polarising, Na+ cation is able to accommodate enough of the bigger peroxide ions (0221 to form a stable lattice (1). The smaller, more polarising, Mg2+ ion forms a more stable lattice with the () ion (1). 

This leaves option 3b to be scrutinised closely. When the present writer did this, he realised that his puzzlement had arisen because he like others, had fallen into the trap of which he had frequently warned his students and which he has emphasised in his writings it is a serious error to attempt to understand electrochemical phenomena by thinking of ions in isolation, because this puts them putatively into a vacuum. But the ions of concern to us do not exist in a vacuum. Ions would not leave their positions of low energy in a crystal lattice to go into solution or be formed from neutral molecules by the transfer of a charged fragment from one molecule to another if those processes were not made exo-energetic by the interaction of the ions with polar or polarisable species in their environment, most commonly the solvent. For that reason, one should always think, and indeed talk, about... 

---