Phillips-Kleinman transformation

Extensive introductions to the effective core potential method may be found in Ref. [8-19]. The theoretical foundation of ECP is the so-called Phillips-Kleinman transformation proposed in 1959 [20] and later generalized by Weeks and Rice [21]. In this method, for each valence orbital (pv there is a pseudo-valence orbital Xv that contains components from the core orbitals and the strong orthogonality constraint is realized by applying the projection operator on both the valence hamiltonian and pseudo-valence wave function (pseudo-valence orbitals). In the generalized Phillips-Kleinman formalism [21], the effect of the projection operator can be absorbed in the valence Pock operator and the core-valence interaction (Coulomb and exchange) plus the effect of the projection operator forms the core potential in ECP method. 

Many of the effective potentials (relativistic or non-relativistic) are generated using the Phillips-Kleinman transformation. In this method, the explicit core-valence orthogonality constraints are replaced by a modified valence Hamiltonian. If one replaces the potential generated by core electrons by a potential Fj, then one can write the one-electron valence wave equation as... 

Explicit inclusion of relativistic effects in valence-only calculations has been by far less frequently attempted. Datta, Ewig and van Wazer [135] used a Phillips-Kleinman PP in a study of PbO, whereas Ishikawa and Malli [136] tested PPs of semilocal form in four-component atomic DHF finite difference calculations. This work was extended by Dolg [137] to four-component molecular DHF calculations with a subsequent correlation treatment. In addition a complicated form of Vcv based on the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation [138] was derived by Pyper [139] and applied in atomic calculations [140]. For all these approaches the computational effort is significantly higher than for the implicit treatment of relativity, and the gain of computational accuracy is not obvious at all. 

Effective Core Potential methods are classified in two families, according to their basic grounds. On the one hand, the Pseudopotential methods (PP) rely on an orbital transformation called the pseudoorbital transformation and they are ultimately related to the Phillips-Kleinman equation [2]. On the other hand, the Model Potential methods (MP) do not rely on any pseudoorbital transformation and they are ultimately related to the Huzinaga-Cantu equation [3,4]. The Ab Initio Model Potential method (AIMP) belongs to the latter family and it has as a... 

---