Perturbation theory crystal orbital structures

Bond orbitals are constructed ft om s/r hybrids for the simple covalent tetrahedral structure energies are written in terms of a eovalent energy V2 and a polar energy K3. There are matrix elements between bond orbitals that broaden the electron levels into bands. In a preliminary study of the bands for perfect crystals, the energies for all bands at k = 0 arc written in terms of matrix elements from the Solid State Tabic. For calculation of other properties, a Bond Orbital Approximation eliminates the need to find the bands themselves and permits the description of bonds in imperfect and noncrystalline solids. Errors in the Bond Orbital Approximation can be corrected by using perturbation theory to construct extended bond orbitals. Two major trends in covalent bonds over the periodic table, polarity and metallicity, arc both defined in terms of parameters from the Solid State Table. This representation of the electronic structure extends to covalent planar and filamentary structures. 

The investigation of the response of macromolecules to external mechanical forces or to electromagnetic fields may basically contribute to our understanding of the structural and functional properties of these systems. The starting point of all studies of this kind is the proper description of the equilibrium (ground) state of the molecule without external fields. In our a priori calculations, the ground state energy is obtained in two steps as a zeroth order approximation the Hartree-Fock (HF) contribution is calculated by the ab initio crystal orbital method (1,2) and electronic correlation effects are included by perturbation theory afterwards. 

So far we have assumed that the electronic structure of the crystal consists of one band derived, in our approximation, from a single atomic state. In general, this will not be a realistic picture. The metals, for example, have a complicated system of overlapping bands derived, in our approximation, from several atomic states. This means that more than one atomic orbital has to be associated with each crystal atom. When this is done, it turns out that even the equations for the one-dimensional crystal cannot be solved directly. However, the mathematical technique developed by Baldock (2) and Koster and Slater (S) can be applied (8) and a formal solution obtained. Even so, the question of the existence of otherwise of surface states in real crystals is diflBcult to answer from theoretical considerations. For the simplest metals, i.e., the alkali metals, for which a one-band model is a fair approximation, the problem is still difficult. The nature of the difficulty can be seen within the framework of our simple model. In the first place, the effective one-electron Hamiltonian operator is really different for each electron. If we overlook this complication and use some sort of mean value for this operator, the operator still contains terms representing the interaction of the considered electron with all other electrons in the crystal. The Coulomb part of this interaction acts in such a way as to reduce the effect of the perturbation introduced by the existence of a free surface. A self-consistent calculation is therefore essential, and the various parameters in our theory would have to be chosen in conformity with the results of such a calculation. 

There are two approaches to the study of electronic structures, formally and traditionally distinct but equivalent in essence the molecular-orbital calculations in which one performs a global energy minimization, and the conventional perturbative crystal-field theory which deals with the details of rare-earth spectra. Some attempts have been done to merge the two approaches (Goodman 1992, Gerard 1993). 

---