Perturbations corrections

Bundgen P, Grein F and Thakkar A J 1995 Dipole and quadrupole moments of small molecules. An ab initio study using perturbatively corrected, multi-reference, configuration interaction wavefunctions J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 334 7... 

All of the terms in eqs. (8.29-8.34) may be used as perturbation operators in connection with non-relativistic theory, as discussed in more detail in Chapter 10. It should be noted, however, that some of the operators are inherently divergent, and should not be used beyond a first-order perturbation correction. 

Taking into account the fluctuative contribution as the perturbative correction, i.e. using for Kij in Eq. (16) the relation (15) with F = Fmfa, we obtain the MFA with fluctuative correction expression, FMFA+f ... 

The usual choice of superoperator metric starts from a HF wavefunction plus perturbative corrections [4, 5] ... 

Applications of electron propagator methods with a single-determinant reference state seldom have been attempted for biradicals such as ozone, for operator space partitionings and perturbative corrections therein assume the dominance of a lone configuration in the reference state. Assignments of the three lowest cationic states were inferred from asymmetry parameters measured with Ne I, He I and He II radiation sources [43]. 

To find the perturbation corrections to the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, we require the matrix elements for the unperturbed harmonic... 

The determination of the coefficients Cay is not necessary for finding the first-order perturbation corrections to the eigenvalues, but is required to obtain the correct zero-order eigenfunctions and their first-order corrections. The coefficients Cay for each value of a (a = 1,2,. .., g ) are obtained by substituting the value found for from the secular equation (9.65) into the set of simultaneous equations (9.64) and solving for the coefficients c 2, , in terms of c i. The normalization condition (9.57) is then used to determine Ca -This procedure uniquely determines the complete set of coefficients Cay (a, y = 1,2, gn) because we have assumed that all the roots are different. 

If spin effects are neglected, the ground-state unperturbed energy level is non-degenerate and its first-order perturbation correction is given by equation (9.24) as... 

The next lowest unperturbed energy level however, is four-fold degenerate and, consequently, degenerate perturbation theory must be used to determine its perturbation corrections. For simplicity of notation, in the quantities and we drop the index n, which has the value... 

The first-order perturbation correction to the ground-state energy is obtained by evaluating equation (9.24) with (9.80) as the perturbation and (9.82) as the unperturbed eigenfunction... 

Numerical values of E > and E + for the helium atom (Z = 2) are given in Table 9.1 along with the exact value. The unperturbed energy value E l has a 37.7% error when compared with the exact value. This large inaccuracy is expected because the perturbation H in equation (9.80) is not small. When the first-order perturbation correction is included, the calculated energy has a 5.3% error, which is still large. 

Calculate the second-order perturbation correction to the ground-state energy for the system in problem 9.5. (Use integration by parts and see Appendix A for the evaluation of the resulting integral.)... 

Since equation (10.43) with F = 0 is already solved, we may treat V as a perturbation and solve equation (10.43) using perturbation theory. The unperturbed eigenfunctions S H q) are the eigenkets n) for the harmonic oscillator. The first-order perturbation correction to the energy as given by equation (9.24) is... 

Since the perturbation corrections due to b q and b q vanish in first order, we must evaluate the second-order corrections in order to find the influence of these perturbation terms on the nuclear energy levels. According to equation (9.34), this second-order correction is... 

The approximate expression (10.50) for the nuclear energy levels E j is observed to contain the initial terms of a power series expansion in (n -I- ) and J J + 1). Only terms up to (n + ff and J(J + )f and the cross term in (n + )J(J 4-1) are included. Higher-order terms in the expansion may be found from higher-order perturbation corrections. 

Head-Gordon M, Oumi M, Maurice D (1999) Quasidegenerate second-order perturbation corrections to single-excitation configuration interaction. Mol Phys 96 593... 

Among various model H(0) s that could be considered, the best such model is evidently that for which the perturbative corrections are most rapidly convergent, i.e., for which /7(perl) is in some sense smallest and the model Em> and < 0) are closest to the true E and T. Perturbation theory can therefore be used to guide selection of the best possible H(0) within a class of competing models, as well as to evaluate systematic corrections to this model. 

Perturbation theory also provides the natural mathematical framework for developing chemical concepts and explanations. Because the model H(0) corresponds to a simpler physical system that is presumably well understood, we can determine how the properties of the more complex system H evolve term by term from the perturbative corrections in Eq. (1.5a), and thereby elucidate how these properties originate from the terms contained in //(pertJ. For example, Eq. (1.5c) shows that the first-order correction E11 is merely the average (quantum-mechanical expectation value) of the perturbation H(pert) in the unperturbed eigenstate 0), a highly intuitive result. Most physical explanations in quantum mechanics can be traced back to this kind of perturbative reasoning, wherein the connection is drawn from what is well understood to the specific phenomenon of interest. 

As described in Sections 1.4 and 1.5, a general fia— 2b donor-acceptor interaction between Lewis ( 2a) and non-Lewis (fib ) NBOs leads to perturbative corrections to the zeroth-order natural Lewis-structure wavefunction... 

However, it is more convenient to determine the NLMOs directly by a numerical procedure56 that incorporates higher perturbation corrections of all orders. As mentioned in Section 3.2.4, the Slater determinant of semi-localized NLMOs... 

Of course, in a purely formal manner we could also treat covalent Fb bond formation in terms of the interaction between FI and Fl+, but such a two-electron ionic DA model is less accurate (i.e., requires larger perturbative corrections) than the electroneutral model of complementary one-electron DA interactions to be employed in this work. 

For the lighter elements rei is much less than unity (e.g., rei = 0.15 for Sc) and the relativistic corrections are small. However, these corrections become much larger for heavier elements (e.g., ,ei = 0.58 for Hg, about four times larger than for Sc) and the perturbative correction procedure breaks down completely as rei approaches unity. Thus, while relativistic corrections are largely ignorable for the first transition series, these corrections become of dominant chemical importance in later series, particularly after filling of the lanthanide f shell. 

Thus, attempts to extend the London theory to distances at which (5.20) is violated must lead to unphysical (non-Hermitian) perturbation corrections, with increasingly severe mathematical and physical contradictions. These difficulties are in contrast to the corresponding NBO-based decomposition (5.8), which remains Pauli-compliant and Hermitian at all distances. 

Because of the separation into a time-independent unperturbed wavefunction and a time-dependent perturbation correction, the time derivative on the right-hand side of the time-dependent Kohn-Sham equation will act only on the response orbitals. From this perturbed wavefunction the first-order response density follows as ... 

---