Permanent gases, analysis

Williams, H. P., Winefordner, J. D. Several high sensitivity radio frequency detectors for permanent gas analysis. J. Gas Chromatog. 6, 11 (1968). 

Other Uses. The form 5A is a traditional gas sohd chromatographic substrate for permanent gas analysis, the butane isomers, and cryogenic analyses of hydrogen isotopes. It is an additive to powders to improve flow properties and... 

The katharometer detector [sometimes spelled cath-erometer and often referred to as the thermal conductivity detector (TCD) or the hot-wire detector (HWD)] is the oldest commercially available gas chromatographic (GC) detector still in common use. Compared with other GC detectors, it is a relatively insensitive detector and has survived largely as a result of its almost universal response. In particular, it is sensitive to the permanent gases to which few other detectors have a significant response. Despite its relatively low sensitivity, the frequent need for permanent gas analysis in many industries probably accounts for it still being the fourth most commonly used GC detector. It is simple in design and requires minimal electronic support and, as a consequence, is also relatively inexpensive compared with other detectors. 

Analysis of the pressure versus temperature data for the tests (see Annex- 2) indicated that case (iii) generated permanent gas but that the other cases were vapour pressure systems. For a vapour pressure system, it is the rate of temperature rise at the relief pressure which, determines the relief system size. The relief pressure of 3 bara corresponds to a temperature of approximately TOO °C for cases (i), (ii) and (v)r and to approximately 80°C for case (iv). It can be seen from Table 3.1 that case (ii) gives the highest rate of temperature rise at that.temperature and is therefore the worst of the vapour pressure systems. 

The most common species used with SIMS sources are Ar+, 02+, 0 , and N2+. These ions and other permanent gas ions are formed easily with high brightness and stability with the hollow cathode duoplasmatron. Ar+ does not enhance the formation of secondary ions but is popular in static SIMS, in which analysis of the undisturbed surface is the goal and no enhancement is necessary. 02+ and 0 both enhance positive secondary ion count rates by formation of surface oxides that serve to increase and control the work function of the surface. 02+ forms a more intense beam than 0 and thus is used preferentially, except in the case of analyzing insulators (see Chapter 11). In some cases the sample surface is flooded with 02 gas for surface control and secondary ion enhancement. An N2+ beam enhances secondary ion formation, but not as well as 02+. It is very useful for profiling and analysis of oxide films on metals, however. It also is less damaging to duoplasmatron hollow cathodes and extends their life by a factor of 5 or more compared to oxygen. 

Despite the speed and accuracy of contemporary analytical techniques, the use of more than one, separately and in sequence, is still very time-consuming. To reduce the analysis time, many techniques are operated concurrently, so that two or more analytical procedures can be carried out simultaneously. The tandem use of two different instruments can increase the analytical efficiency, but due to unpredictable interactions between one technique and the other, the combination can be quite difficult in practice. These difficulties become exacerbated if optimum performance is required from both instruments. The mass spectrometer was a natural choice for the early tandem systems to be developed with the gas chromatograph, as it could easily accept samples present as a vapor in a permanent gas. 

In principle, a helium leak detector detects the partial pressure of a tracer gas in vacuum with a suitable sensor. Small mass spectrometers have become common as a sensor, especially small magnetic sector-field mass spectrometers with permanent magnets. Also the quadrupole mass spectrometer well known from residual gas analysis can be found in some leak detectors. 

Limitations As it is universal, its performance is poor for trace analysis in complex matrices. Low or no response for hilly oxidized, highly chlorinated or brominated substances. Not suitable for permanent gas, except for CO and COj with methanizer. 

Analysis of Permanent Gases and Noncondensable Hydrocarbons by Gas Phase Chromatography... 

Gas chromatography is especially useful for gas-phase analysis of partial oxidation, hydrogenation, or hydroconversion products as in many cases a full carbon balance (educts, products, and all side products), in order to evaluate sample performance. As the detection and quantification of permanent gases such as N2, 02, CO, and C02 and also of higher boiling compounds are standard separation problems for gas chromatography, it is wise to employ the method regarding this problem. 

---