Pauli principle function

It can be proven [31] that all possible Slater determinants of N particles constructed from a complete system of orthonormalized spin-orbitals 4>k form a complete basis in the space of normalized antisymmetric (satisfying the Pauli principle) functions, of N electrons i.e. for any antisymmetric and normalizable (K one can find expansion amplitudes so that ... 

In Chapter VIII, Haas and Zilberg propose to follow the phase of the total electronic wave function as a function of the nuclear coordinates with the aim of locating conical intersections. For this purpose, they present the theoretical basis for this approach and apply it for conical intersections connecting the two lowest singlet states (Si and So). The analysis starts with the Pauli principle and is assisted by the permutational symmetry of the electronic wave function. In particular, this approach allows the selection of two coordinates along which the conical intersections are to be found. 

The most general statement of the Pauli principle for electrons and other fermions is that the total wave function must be antisymmetric to electron (or fermion) exchange. For bosons it must be symmetric to exchange. 

Since the coiTelation between opposite spins has both intra- and inter-orbital contributions, it will be larger than the correlation between electrons having the same spin. The Pauli principle (or equivalently the antisymmetry of the wave function) has the consequence that there is no intraorbital conelation from electron pairs with the same spin. The opposite spin correlation is sometimes called the Coulomb correlation, while the same spin correlation is called the Fermi correlation, i.e. the Coulomb correlation is the largest contribution. Another way of looking at electron correlation is in terms of the electron density. In the immediate vicinity of an electron, here is a reduced probability of finding another electron. For electrons of opposite spin, this is often referred to as the Coulomb hole, the corresponding phenomenon for electrons of the same spin is the Fermi hole. 

The Dirac equation automatically includes effects due to electron spin, while this must be introduced in a more or less ad hoc fashion in the Schrodinger equation (the Pauli principle). Furthermore, once the spin-orbit interaction is included, the total electron spin is no longer a good quantum number, an orbital no longer contains an integer number of a and /) spin functions. The proper quantum number is now the total angular momentum obtained by vector addition of the orbital and spin moments. 

The notion of electrons in orbitals consists essentially of ascribing four distinct quantum numbers to each electron in a many-electron atom. It can be shown that this notion is strictly inconsistent with quantum mechanics (7). Definite quantum numbers for individual electrons do not have any meaning in the framework of quantum mechanics. The erroneous view stems from the original formulation of the Pauli principle in 1925, which stated that no two electrons could share the same four quantum numbers (8), This version of the principle was superseded by a new formulation that avoids any reference to individual quantum numbers for separate electrons. The new version due to the independent work of Heisenberg and Dirac in 1926 states that the wave function of a many-electron atom must be antisymmetrical with respect to the interchange of any two particles (9,10). 

The electrons must fulfill the Pauli principle and the wave function must be zero at the walls of the box with length I = resulting in the following values of the k... 

Note that the PHF wave function is no longer a single determinant and is a sum of two terms. This PHF function both satisfies the Pauli principle and is a pure singlet state. The energy formula E(PHF-FSGO) is easily derived ... 

Redress can be obtained by the electron localization function (ELF). It decomposes the electron density spatially into regions that correspond to the notion of electron pairs, and its results are compatible with the valence shell electron-pair repulsion theory. An electron has a certain electron density p, (x, y, z) at a site x, y, z this can be calculated with quantum mechanics. Take a small, spherical volume element AV around this site. The product nY(x, y, z) = p, (x, y, z)AV corresponds to the number of electrons in this volume element. For a given number of electrons the size of the sphere AV adapts itself to the electron density. For this given number of electrons one can calculate the probability w(x, y, z) of finding a second electron with the same spin within this very volume element. According to the Pauli principle this electron must belong to another electron pair. The electron localization function is defined with the aid of this probability ... 

According to the Pauli principle two electrons can adopt the same wave function, so that the N electrons of the N hydrogen atoms take the energy states in the lower half of the band, and the band is said to be half occupied . The highest occupied energy level... 

The requirement that electrons have antisymmetrical wave functions is called the Pauli principle, which can be stated as follows ... 

The connection between the Pauli exclusion principle and the more general Pauli principle can be understood as follows. If two electrons with the same spin a were to occupy the same orbital ip, the total wave function for the system would be written yi, zO (/ "to, yi,... 

Exchanging the coordinates of the two electrons changes the wave function to tlf(x2, yi, z2) Pa(x, yi, Zi), which is the same as before. Since the wave function does not change sign, it is forbidden by the Pauli principle. Hence two electrons with the same spin cannot be described by the same wave function, or, in other words, an orbital cannot contain two electrons with the same spin. As we shall see, this form of the Pauli principle is used in describing atoms and molecules in terms of orbitals. 

A corollary of the Pauli principle is that no two electrons with the same spin can ever simultaneously be at the same point in space. If two electrons with the same spin were at the same point in space simultaneously, then on interchanging these two electrons, the wave function should change sign as required by the Pauli principle (4 —> - 4 ). Since in this case the two electrons have the same space and spin coordinates (i.e.,... 

The delocalization may be assumed to occur in a box of dimensions Lx x LyxLz, containing the carbon skeleton, freely rotating about its x-axis. The dimensions Ly = Lz are assumed equal to l, the diameter of the rotationally disordered skeleton. The length of the box, for a C/v chain is assumed to be Lx — Nl. The delocalized electrons are confined by the Pauli principle to N/2 energy levels with wave functions... 

The conclusions from this rather elementary survey of the symmetry constraint problem all point in the same general direction. The imposition of symmetry constraints (other than the Pauli principle) on a variationally-based model is either unnecessary or harmful. Far from being necessary to ensure the physical reality of the wave function, these constraints often lead to absurd results or numerical instabilities in the implementation. The spin eigenfunction constraint is only realistic when the electrons are in close proximity and in such cases comes out of the UHF calculation automatically. The imposition of molecular spatial symmetry on the AO basis is not necessary if that basis has been chosen carefully — i.e. is near optimum. Further, any breakdowns in the spatial symmetry of the AO basis are a useful indication that the basis has been chosen badly or is redundant. 

The method based on the Weisacker functional can be improved if one chooses a computational ansatz that imposes the Pauli principle. For every Wrepresentable electron density, p(x), there exists some Slater determinant with that density. More generally, there exists an ensemble of Welectron Slater determinants. 

---