Paul, Apostle

To these ancient identities was added in due course the historical Jesus.It was the apostle Paul who established the dehnitive Christian dogma concerning the nature of Christ. His account recalls the role of the ancient Iranian and Jewish Saviour figure (although the exact relationship to the pagan elements is the subject of serious contention on the part of Christian theology). 

There are two Saul s mentioned in the Bible, both evidently mythical-this earlier one who fought the Philistines, and a later one who before his conversion persecuted the Christians, after which he changed his name to Paul, and became an apostle of Christ. The two stories bear many points of resemblance one to the other, and, mystically interpreted, will be found to be the same story in a different setting. 

The views Capito expressed in the interview with Bekesteyn accorded with the Consilium theologicum (1540), which appeared under Bucer s name but was perhaps composed with input from Capita.86 Like the document described by Bekesteyn, Bucer s Consilium maintains that the Catholic church is a legitimate church, speaks of the importance of a man s vocation, and mentions the example of the apostles, especially St. Paul s profession that with the Jews I lived like a Jew, to win over the Jews (I Cor. 9 20-21). The emphasis in the Consilium was, however, on the temporary nature of such actions, which were condoned only as long as the church was still under the tyranny of the Pope. 87... 

We know Him in two ways. In the first place through the creation, preservation and government of the whole world For this is like a beautiful hook, before our eyes, in which all creatures, big and small, are like letters, which show us the invisible things of God, namely his eternalpower and Godhead, like the apostle Paul says in Rom. 1 20 ... 

Part. It is also different from the animalistic Soul, from which we have to separate the reasonable Spirit, through the power of God s Word. The Apostle Paul describes this as more penetrating than a double-edged sword and of which he says that it is alive, effective, and that it is capable of separating the Spirit from the Soul. 

However in reality, Kant, with his one-sided conceptual intellectual comprehension, unwillingly confirmed, the Truth of the Apostle Paul s words, when he said ... 

According to the Words of the Apostle Paul, when a Human Being is not "spiritually appraised," that means as long as a Human Being within himself has not directed his Spirit upon the Higher (the Divine), that is why he will not be able to free his Soul from the bondage of the lower and the demonic. Therefore, it is the first task of the Alchemist to draw his Spirit out of the earthly and the worldly, to "extract" and to "distil above the alembic," that means to lift over and above all ratio into the transcendental and into the Divine. 

I speak as concerning reproach, as though we had been weak. Howbeit whereinsoever any is bold, I am bold also Are they Hebrews So am I," said the Apostle Paul and at the same time, he mentioned how he spent a day and night in the depth of the ocean ... 

The Apostle Paul, subdivided the threefold human nature into Spirit (pneuma), Soul (psyche) and body (soma) and never confused the pure Soul with the principal of wantonness (to epithymoun)... 

What is, however, already in existance in us, is the so-called "Soul-Body" (soma psychicon) of the Apostle Paul. That means, the impure half-material Astral-Body, the Mumia of Paracelsus, the Habal-Garmin (Bone-Spirit) of the Quabbalists which, however, contains too many impurities from the earthly matter, and that is why the Soul-Body in the "World Beyond" is inevitably subject to dissolution if he is not purified during our lifetime and transformed into a transfigured Spirit-Body. 

There are so many new discoveries in natural products research that no one can be an expert in all the areas unless they were content to be superficial. Thus, we have to remember the following words of Apostle Paul, The person who thinks he knows something really does not know as he ought to know. (I Corinthians 8 2). 

Subsequently, she invited the Apostle Paul, on his missionary journey from Philippi to Thessalonica, into her own house. At that time, Thyatira was famous for Tyrian purple dyeworks and for dealing in purple. [37]... 

Paul Levy, Moore G.E. Moore and the Cambridge Apostles (Oxford Oxford University Press, 1979), p. 66. 

Positive rules were those rules in the Bible directly commanded by God or by Jesus. See Romans 14, a letter in which the apostle Paul enjoins toleration of differences in ohservance among Christians, and argues that no-one should undertake an observance (e.g. either eating meat or not, or worshipping on one particular day of the week and not another) if they do not believe that observance to be commanded. It concludes (v. 23) And he that eateth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith for whatsoever is not of faith is sin . 

In post-Reformation England, there was of course no doubt that it was St Paul, the Apostle consistently preferred by Protestantism, who had the right of it thus in The Image of Ireland, John Derrick declares... 

The apostle Paul described the care of orphans indirectly in his instructions concerning Christian widows. He insisted that widows first care for their own orphaned children and grandchildren. If these women had proven virtuous in raising their children, receiving strangers, and assisting those persecuted for the faith, and if they had reached the age of sixty, then the Christian community should enroll them as widows (i Tim 5 3 12). Paul s ordinances provide the first evidence of an order of widows in the early Church, not simply poor widows in need of sustenance, but older women who have accepted a special ministry after demonstrating fives of piety and charity. ... 

Again, it seems that the apostle Paul fulfilled the command of his lord and master when he was struck in the face and said to the chief priest God will strike you, whitewashed wall You are sitting to judge me according to the law, and yet you order me to be struck m contravention of the law. Those standing nearby said to him You are committing an offence against the chief priest. ... 

---