Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Particle model, calculation intensity

Several additional, non-microstructural, inputs are required for the fracture model (i) Particle critical stress intensity factor, KIc. Here, the value determined in a previous study (Klc = 0.285 MPa in )[3] was adopted for all four graphites studied. This value is significantly less than the bulk Klc of graphites (typically -0.8-1.2 MPa rn). However, as discussed in the previous section, when considering fracture occurring in volumes commensurate in size with the process zone a reduced value of Klc is appropriate (ii) the specimen volume, taken to be the stressed volume of the ASTM tensile test specimens specimen used to determine the tensile strength distributions and (iii) the specimen breadth, b, of a square section specimen. For cylindrical specimens, such as those used here, an equivalent breadth is calculated such that the specimen cross sectional area is identical, i.e.,... [Pg.545]

Figure 3. Two particle models used to calculate the theoretical scattered intensity. (A) = the discoid (B) = the closed lamella (o) water molecule ( ) s oxyethylene chain ... Figure 3. Two particle models used to calculate the theoretical scattered intensity. (A) = the discoid (B) = the closed lamella (o) water molecule ( ) s oxyethylene chain ...
Lifetime of low energy E y-rays. The lifetimes of a number of low energy E 1 y-rays have been measured in the heavy elements. Some of these lifetimes have been noted by Goldhaber and Sunyar who pointed out that they are all much longer (by factors of 10 or more) than one would expect for E 1 lifetimes calculated on the single particle model. While some of these y-rays have been identified by conversion measurements, one, (e.g. the 27 kev y-ray produced in Ac by the decay of Pa ) has been identified merely by its intensity 2. The measured lifetimes and the ratios of these lifetimes to those calculated from Weisskopf s estimates are shown in Table 9. [Pg.355]

These effects have been illustrated by calculations for simple idealized cases. There appear to be quite pronounced effects due to the particle and they must be taken into account in any application of inelastic scattering for quantitative determinations of the amount of a specific molecule in ian aerosol. Model calculations of inelastic scattering by isotropically polarizable electric dipoles uniformly distributed within an otherwise nonabsorbing dielectric sphere exhibit a variation of more than two orders of magnitude in the inelastically scattered intensity per active molecule as the particle size is varied. [Pg.115]

Compai ison with literature experimental and calculation data showed that the model proposed ensures the accurate behavior of the functional dependence of x-ray fluorescence intensity on the particle size. Its main advantage is the possibility to estimate the effect of particle size for polydispersive multicomponent substances. [Pg.113]

Kerkhof and Moulijn [30] suggested that a supported catalyst may be modeled as a stack of sheets of support material, with cubic crystals representing the supported particles. They used this stratified layer model, illustrated in Fig. 3.9b, to calculate the intensity ratio /P//s for electron trajectories perpendicular to the support sheets, assuming exponential attenuation of the electrons in the particles and the support. [Pg.66]

A further point is that for a multiply-twinned particle of diameter 1 nm, for example, the constituent single crystal regions are half of this size or less and so contain only two or three planes of atoms. One can not expect, under these circumstances, that the diffraction pattern will be made up merely by addition of the intensities of the single crystal regions. Coherence interference effects from atoms in adjacent regions will become important. It is then necessary to compare the experimental patterns with patterns calculated for various model structures. [Pg.351]

The sum of the waves that result in these two experiments must equal the original plane wave incident on the particle, and the two disturbance electric fields due to diffraction are of equal magnitude, but are of opposite sign. Since the intensity is the square modulus of the electric fields, either case will produce the same answer since the sign will not affect the result. It will turn out to be simpler to calculate the scatter light intensity using the second model presented above. [Pg.67]

The existence of a solid itself, the solid surfaces, the phenomena of adsorption and absorption of gases are due to the interactions between different components of a system. The nature of the interaction between the particles of a gas-solid system is quite diverse. It depends on the nature of the solid s atoms and the gas-phase molecules. The theory of particle interactions is studied by quantum chemistry [4,5]. To date, one can consider that the prospective trends in the development of this theory for metals and semiconductors [6,7] and alloys [8] have been formulated. They enable one to describe the thermodynamic characteristics of solids, particularly of phase equilibria, the conditions of stability of systems, and the nature of phase transitions [9,10]. Lately, methods of calculating the interactions of adsorbed particles with a surface and between adsorbed particles have been developing intensively [11-13]. But the practical use of quantum-chemical methods for describing physico-chemical processes is hampered by mathematical difficulties. This makes one employ rougher models of particle interaction - model or empirical potentials. Their choice depends on the problems being considered. [Pg.349]


See other pages where Particle model, calculation intensity is mentioned: [Pg.522]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.1100]    [Pg.655]    [Pg.746]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.792]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.1093]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.649]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.423]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.256 , Pg.257 ]




SEARCH



Intensity calculation

Model calculations

Models particles

Particle calculated

Particle model, calculation

© 2024 chempedia.info