Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Particle-dimension distribution equation

In the recent years different numerical models for the conversion of wood in a packed bed have been presented, e. g, [3-6], Existing models mostly describe the as a porous media by an Eulerian approach, with the cons vation equations for the solid and the gas phase solved with the same mesh. This approach implies that heat and mass transfer can only be taken into account according to the dimensions of the bed but not within the particles itself. Temperature and species distributions are assumed to be homogenous over the fuel particles. Thus, the influence of the particle dimensions on the conversion process can only be captured by simplified assumptions or macrokinetic data. [Pg.586]

These two approaches for the determination of the excess chemical potential of the substance of the dispersed phase, Ap,. and Ap,., are used in the analysis of different aspects related to the equilibrium state of disperse systems. The first approach was utilized in Chapter 1,3 in the derivation of the Kelvin equation, when we examined the equilibrium between the dispersed particle and the continuous phase. The second approach accounts for the involvement of particles in thermal motion and therefore envisions both generation and disappearance of a particle as a whole, and thus allows one to describe the equilibrium between particles of different sizes. The equilibrium particle size distribution corresponds to a condition of constant chemical potential for particles of different sizes (including those of molecular dimensions), i.e. Ap/ = const. The expression for the equilibrium number of particles of a given radius2, r, can be obtained from eq. (IV. 12) as... [Pg.272]

Surface fractal dimensions of a number of Cambisols and Luvisols were determined using the FHH equation from data obtained from N2 and water vapor adsorption isotherms. Values were compared with those obtained from the mercury intmsion method and with mass fractal dimensions that were evaluated from particle-size distributions using a modified number-based method [108] (Figure 6.3). This method was proposed by Kozak et al. [116] in order to correct some inconsistencies of previous approaches... [Pg.208]

Using this equation as a starting point it is possible to calculate particle size distributions from rates of settling. Particle concentrations should be below 1 %, and the method is only suitable for particles whose longest dimension exceeds its shortest by a factor of less than four. Terminal velocities are reached virtually instantaneously with particles below 50 pm in liquids. As with other particle measurement techniques, it is necessary that the particles be dispersed in the fluid, and one may have to use dispersing agents (at concentrations of roughly 0.1 %) for this purpose. [Pg.220]

This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents non-trivial properties of the velocity distribution functions for RIG for quasi and ordinary particles in one dimensions. In section 3 we find the state equation for relativistic ideal gas of both types. Section 4 presents the distribution function for the observed frequency radiation generated for quasi and ordinary particles of the relativistic ideal gas, for fluxons under transfer radiation and radiative atoms of the relativistic ideal gas. Section 5 presents a generalization of the theory of the relativistic ideal gas in three dimensions and the distribution function for particles... [Pg.161]

Exercise. A particle obeys the ordinary diffusion equation in three dimensions. It starts at a given point inside a given sphere. Find the probability distribution of its exit points on the sphere. [Pg.297]

The constructed system of equations is a closed one. It is solved with the preset initial conditions 6j (r — 0), 0 jg(, t — 0), 6i (2, t = 0). The system of equations makes it possible to describe arbitrary distributions of particles on a surface and their evolution in time. The only shortcoming is the large dimension. The minimal fragment of a lattice on which a process with cyclic boundary conditions should be described is 4 x 4. It is, therefore, natural to raise the question of approximating the description of particle distribution to lower the dimension of the system of equations. In this connection, it is reasonable to consider simpler point-like models. [Pg.387]

Whereas the surface area of a crystalline silica is in fact the external surface area, the surface area and the pore size distribution of an amorphous silica are actually determined by the dimensions of the silica spheres (primary particles) that build up the network. For non-aggregated spherical particles, this relationship is very straightforward. In this silica type, the primary particles are not clustered and Sheinfain s3 globular theory can be applied. The globular theory predicts an inverse relationship between surface area and the primary particle size by the following equation ... [Pg.13]

We return first to the process of fraction collection and note that subsequent testing often yields the second dimension of information. Interpretation is somewhat complicated by the fact that any single fraction will contain a variety of particles having different densities and different sizes. However, for a given fraction (given V and X values), diameter d and density Ap are connected by Equation 3. Therefore, any subsequent test capable of yielding a second relationship involving d and/or Ap will yield information on both quantities. For example, if electron microscopy is used to determine the size distribution of particles within the fraction, then Equation 3 can be used to obtain a density distribution. [Pg.228]

The Brownian motion of a particle under the influence of an external force field, and its consequent escape over a potential barrier has to be treated, in general, using the Fokker-Planck equation. This equation gives the distribution function W governing the probability that a particle will be after time t at a point x with velocity u (Chandrasekhar, 1943). In one dimension it has the form ... [Pg.156]


See other pages where Particle-dimension distribution equation is mentioned: [Pg.91]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.1787]    [Pg.808]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.1781]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.938]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.905]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.1307]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.91 ]




SEARCH



Distribution equation

Distribution particle dimension

Particle distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info