Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Partial calibration characteristics

In Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES), a gaseous, solid (as fine particles), or liquid (as an aerosol) sample is directed into the center of a gaseous plasma. The sample is vaporized, atomized, and partially ionized in the plasma. Atoms and ions are excited and emit light at characteristic wavelengths in the ultraviolet or visible region of the spectrum. The emission line intensities are proportional to the concentration of each element in the sample. A grating spectrometer is used for either simultaneous or sequential multielement analysis. The concentration of each element is determined from measured intensities via calibration with standards. [Pg.48]

Similarly, the m/z = 60 ion current signal was converted into the partial current for methanol oxidation to formic acid in a four-electron reaction (dash-dotted line in Fig. 13.3c for calibration, see Section 13.2). The resulting partial current of methanol oxidation to formic acid does not exceed about 10% of the methanol oxidation current. Obviously, the sum of both partial currents of methanol oxidation to CO2 and formic acid also does not reach the measured faradaic current. Their difference is plotted in Fig. 13.3c as a dotted line, after the PtO formation/reduction currents and pseudoca-pacitive contributions, as evident in the base CV of a Pt/Vulcan electrode (dotted line in Fig. 13.1a), were subtracted as well. Apparently, a signihcant fraction of the faradaic current is used for the formation of another methanol oxidation product, other than CO2 and formic acid. Since formaldehyde formation has been shown in methanol oxidation at ambient temperatures as well, parallel to CO2 and formic acid formation [Ota et al., 1984 Iwasita and Vielstich, 1986 Korzeniewski and ChUders, 1998 ChUders et al., 1999], we attribute this current difference to the partial current of methanol oxidation to formaldehyde. (Note that direct detection of formaldehyde by DBMS is not possible under these conditions, owing to its low volatility and interference with methanol-related mass peaks, as discussed previously [Jusys et al., 2003]). Assuming that formaldehyde is the only other methanol oxidation product in addition to CO2 and formic acid, we can quantitatively determine the partial currents of all three major products during methanol oxidation, which are otherwise not accessible. Similarly, subtraction of the partial current for formaldehyde oxidation to CO2 from the measured faradaic current for formaldehyde oxidation yields an additional current, which corresponds to the partial oxidation of formaldehyde to formic acid. The characteristics of the different Ci oxidation reactions are presented in more detail in the following sections. [Pg.428]

The accuracy attainable with a liquid-in-glass thermometer is limited by the characteristics of the thermometer itself. Instability of the thermometric liquid, nonuniformity of capillary bore, and inaccuracies in scale graduation are the important factors. Uncertainties in corrections for the emergent stem may greatly limit the accuracy of partial-immersion thermometers. Generally, partial-immersion thermometers are assigned an uncertainty of 0.3°C in their calibration, whereas total immersion thermometers may have an uncertainty as small as 0.03°C. Observer errors add to the uncertainty but with care these can usually be made relatively small. [Pg.294]

Ma and Kim (1995) developed an on-line LC/TS/MS method for the analysis of PL molecular species in rat brain. After total lipid extraction, the extract was subjected to analysis with on-line reversed-phase HPLC and filament-on TS/MS. By using non-conventional HPLC conditions, partial separation of individual PL classes (PS, PI, PE and PC) and partial separation of molecular species within each class were achieved. By monitoring the retention time and the characteristic fragment ions (DG ions) formed in the filament-on TS process, individual molecular species in each PL class could be identified. Although non-linear calibration curves were observed for all DG ions monitored, even in the presence of an internal standard, semiquant-itative and quantitative results could still be obtained for a mixture of PLs. [Pg.218]

Although colorimetric methods were the earliest to be used for pesticide analysis [203], competitive spectroscopic methodologies for the determination of these pollutants were not developed until the last decade. The spectroscopic determination of several pesticides in mixtures has been the major hindrance, especially when their analytical characteristics are similar and their signals overlap as a result. Multivariate calibration has proved effective with a view to developing models for qualitative and quantitative prediction from spectroscopic data. Thus, partial least squares (PLS) and principal component regression (PCR) have been used as calibration models for the spectrofluorimetric determination of three pesticides (carbendazim, fuberidazole, and thiabendazole) [204]. A three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix fluorescence method has also been used for this purpose (Table 18.3) [205]. [Pg.480]

Design values are calculated trough a representative value (called characteristic value) and a set of partial factors. Through partial factors the designer assigns a certain level of reliability to the structure. The partial factors are fixed values, calibrated using probabilistic methods. [Pg.2176]


See other pages where Partial calibration characteristics is mentioned: [Pg.178]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.945]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.946]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.1214]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.7733]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.151]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.210 ]




SEARCH



Calibration characteristics

© 2024 chempedia.info