Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Parameterized comparator

Here is a model for a parameterized N-bit binary comparator. The input vectors are treated as unsigned quantities and a numerical comparison is made. [Pg.134]


Robust theoretical formalism use robust linear methods global optimum for convergence good accuracy, generahzation and robustness to noise simpfified parameterization compared to ANNs imphcit feature selection computationally weakly affected by input dimensionahty ... [Pg.257]

AMBER A Program for Simulation of Biological and Organic Molecules Biomembranes Modeling Cambridge Structural Database CHARMM The Energy Function and Its Parameterization Comparative Molecular Field... [Pg.2055]

PM3, developed by James J.P. Stewart, is a reparameterization of AMI, which is based on the neglect of diatomic differential overlap (NDDO) approximation. NDDO retains all one-center differential overlap terms when Coulomb and exchange integrals are computed. PM3 differs from AMI only in the values of the parameters. The parameters for PM3 were derived by comparing a much larger number and wider variety of experimental versus computed molecular properties. Typically, non-bonded interactions are less repulsive in PM3 than in AMI. PM3 is primarily used for organic molecules, but is also parameterized for many main group elements. [Pg.129]

The CNDO method has been modified by substitution of semiempirical Coulomb integrals similar to those used in the Pariser-Parr-Pople method, and by the introduction of a new empirical parameter to differentiate resonance integrals between a orbitals and tt orbitals. The CNDO method with this change in parameterization is extended to the calculation of electronic spectra and applied to the isoelectronic compounds benzene, pyridine, pyri-dazine, pyrimidine and pyrazine. The results obtained were refined by a limited Cl calculation, and compared with the best available experimental data. It was found that the agreement was quite satisfactory for both the n TT and n tt singlet transitions. The relative energies of the tt and the lone pair orbitals in pyridine and the diazines are compared and an explanation proposed for the observed orders. Also, the nature of the lone pairs in these compounds is discussed. [Pg.150]

Validation of a force field is typically done by showing how accurately it reproduces reference data, which may or may not have been used in the actual parameterization. Since different force fields employ different sets of reference data, it is difficult to compare their accuracy directly. Indeed there is no single best force field, each has its advantages and disadvantages. They perform best for the type of compounds used in the parameterization, but may give questionable results for other systems. Table 2.6 gives some typical accuracies for AH( that can be obtained with the MM2 force field. [Pg.45]

Considering that the parameters for the MNDO/d method for all first row elements (which are present in most of the training set of compounds) are identical to MNDO, the improvement by addition of d-functions is quite impressive. It should also be noted that MNDO/d only contains 15 parameters, compared to 18 for PM3, and that some of the 15 parameters are taken from atomic data (analogously to the MNDO/AMl parameterization), and not used in the molecular data fitting as in PM3. [Pg.92]

The mixing coefficients a and b in (4.10) depend upon the efficiency of the spin-orbit coupling process, parameterized by the so-called spin-orbit coupling coefficient A (or for a single electron). As A O, so also do a or b. Spin-orbit coupling effects, especially for the first period transition elements, are rather small compared with either Coulomb or crystal-field effects, so the mixing coefficients a ox b are small. However, insofar that they are non-zero, we might write a transition moment as in Eq. (4.11). [Pg.65]

Explicit mechanisms attempt to include all nonmethane hydrocarbons believed present in the system with an explicit representation of their known chemical reactions. Atmospheric simulation experiments with controlled NMHC concentrations can be used to develop explicit mechanisms. Examples of these are Leone and Seinfeld (164), Hough (165) and Atkinson et al (169). Rate constants for homogeneous (gas-phase) reactions and photolytic processes are fairly well established for many NMHC. Most of the lower alkanes and alkenes have been extensively studied, and the reactions of the higher family members, although little studied, should be comparable to the lower members of the family. Terpenes and aromatic hydrocarbons, on the other hand, are still inadequately understood, in spite of considerable experimental effort. Parameterization of NMHC chemistry results when NMHC s known to be present in the atmosphere are not explicitly incorporated into the mechanism, but rather are assigned to augment the concentration of NMHC s of similar chemical nature which the... [Pg.90]

When NMHC are significant in concentration, differences in their oxidation mechanisms such as how the NMHC chemistry was parameterized, details of R02-/R02 recombination (95), and heterogenous chemistry also contribute to differences in computed [HO ]. Recently, the sensitivity of [HO ] to non-methane hydrocarbon oxidation was studied in the context of the remote marine boundary-layer (156). It was concluded that differences in radical-radical recombination mechanisms (R02 /R02 ) can cause significant differences in computed [HO ] in regions of low NO and NMHC levels. The effect of cloud chemistry in the troposphere has also recently been studied (151,180). The rapid aqueous-phase breakdown of formaldehyde in the presence of clouds reduces the source of HOj due to RIO. In addition, the dissolution in clouds of a NO reservoir (N2O5) at night reduces the formation of HO and CH2O due to R6-RIO and R13. Predictions for HO and HO2 concentrations with cloud chemistry considered compared to predictions without cloud chemistry are 10-40% lower for HO and 10-45% lower for HO2. [Pg.93]

The fiuid-phase simulation approach with the longest tradition is the simulation of large numbers of the molecules in boxes with artificial periodic boundary conditions. Since quantum chemical calculations typically are unable to treat systems of the required size, the interactions of the molecules have to be represented by classical force fields as a prerequisite for such simulations. Such force fields have analytical expressions for all forces and energies, which depend on the distances, partial charges and types of atoms. Due to the overwhelming importance of the solvent water, an enormous amount of research effort has been spent in the development of good force field representations for water. Many of these water representations have additional interaction sites on the bonds, because the representation by atom-centered charges turned out to be insufficient. Unfortunately it is impossible to spend comparable parameterization work for every other solvent and... [Pg.296]

The reactions of the bare sodium ion with all neutrals were determined to proceed via a three-body association mechanism and the rate constants measured cover a large range from a slow association reaction with NH3 to a near-collision rate with CH3OC2H4OCH3 (DMOE). The lifetimes of the intermediate complexes obtained using parameterized trajectory results and the experimental rates compare fairly well with predictions based on RRKM theory. The calculations also accounted for the large isotope effect observed for the more rapid clustering of ND3 than NH3 to Na+. [Pg.223]

The earliest successful parameterization of electrical effects is that of Hammett6-8. Burkhardt reported the existence of QSRR two years before Hammett but did not develop a general relationship9. Hammett defined the am and ap constants using the ionization constants (Kx) of 3- and 4-substituted benzoic acids in water at 25 °C as the reference set and hydrogen as the reference substituent (i.e. K ) to which all others are compared. For hydrogen the values of the am and ap constants were defined as zero. [Pg.687]


See other pages where Parameterized comparator is mentioned: [Pg.123]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.10]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.134 ]




SEARCH



Parameterization

Parameterized

Parameterizing

© 2024 chempedia.info