Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Parameter 80 values, transition structure

HyperChem offers a Reaction Map facility under the Setup menu. This is needed for the synchronous transit method to match reactants and products, and depending on X (a parameter having values between 0 and 1, determining how far away from reactants structures a transition structure can be expected) will connect atoms in reactants and products and give an estimated or expected transition structure. This procedure can also be used if the eigenvector following method is later chosen for a transition state search method, i.e., if you just want to get an estimate of the transition state geometry. [Pg.67]

Prediction of the energy level structure for Pu2+ (5f ) is of particular interest since no spectra for this valence state of Pu have been reported. On the basis of what is known of the spectra of Am2+ (26), Cf2" (27), and Es2+ (28), there appears to be evidence for a very small crystal-field splitting of the free-ion levels. Such evidence encourages use of a free-ion calculation in this particular case. The parameter values selected are indicated in Table V. Based on the systematics given by Brewer (19), the first f- d transition should occur near 11000 cm-, so the f- -f transitions at higher energies would be expected to be at least partially obscured. A... [Pg.189]

FIGURE 8. Geometrical parameters of the nearly symmetrical transition structure (a) for propylene epoxidation with peroxynitrous acid optimized at the QCISD/6-31G and CISD/6-31G (values are in parentheses) levels and unsymmetrical transition structures (b) and (c) resulting from the geometry optimizations at the B3LYP/6-311G and MP2(fuU)/6-31G levels, respectively... [Pg.20]

Figure 6.52 Schematic electron addition and removal spectra representing the electronic structure of transition-metal compounds for different regimes of the parameter values (a) charge-transfer insulator with U > A (b) Mott-Hubbard insulator A> U (From Rao et al, 1992). Figure 6.52 Schematic electron addition and removal spectra representing the electronic structure of transition-metal compounds for different regimes of the parameter values (a) charge-transfer insulator with U > A (b) Mott-Hubbard insulator A> U (From Rao et al, 1992).
FIGURE 23. Selected geometrical parameters for the transition structures for the epoxidation of 1,3-butadiene (a) and acrylonitrile (b) with peroxyformic acid calculated at the QCISD/6-31G, CISD/6-31G (in parentheses), B3LYP/6-31G (in square brackets) and MP2/6-31G (in curly brackets) levels. The B3LYP/6-311+G(3df,2p) values are given in italic in square brackets. Bond lengths... [Pg.53]

The Bronsted parameters measure the sensitivity of the reaction in one direction to polar substituent changes compared with that for the overall equilibrium. A Bronsted parameter is, therefore, a measure of the charge distribution in the transition structure relative to the reactant and product the value of a should normally be between —1 and zero, and /3 between +1 and zero. An a or /3 of —1 or +1, respectively, indicates that the proton is completely transferred from the donor HB+ to the substrate, or from the substrate to the acceptor base B, in the transition structure of the rate-limiting step. [Pg.299]

In many series of analogous reactions a second proportionality is found experimentally, namely, between the free energy change (AGr a thermodynamic quantity) and the free energy of activation (AG, a kinetic quantity). In a series of analogous reactions, a third parameter besides AH and AG no doubt also depends on the AG and AGr values, namely, the structure of the transition state. This relationship is generally assumed or postulated, and only in a few cases has it been supported by calculations (albeit usually only in the form of the so-called transition structures they are likely to resemble the structures of the transition state, however). This relationship is therefore not stated as a law or a principle but as a postulate, the so-called Hammond postulate. [Pg.14]

To assess the reliability of the particular ONIOM scheme employed in the analysis of the aldol addition, Ojea and coworkers" considered the difference between the activation energies of the most stable transition structures 136 and 137 in the favored disolvated reaction channel (130 and 131) as a convenient parameter for the -value test proposed by Morokuma" . In this manner the error of the ONIOM(I) and ONIOM(II) extrapolations, with respect to their benchmark calculations at the B3LYP/6-31- -G //HF/6-31G level, were 0.86 and 0.60 kcalmol", respectively. When the geometry optimizations at the ONIOM(II) level were followed by single-point energy evaluations at the B3LYP/6-31-l-G level, the error was reduced to less than 0.10 kcalmoG. ... [Pg.47]

The relationships are of substantial value in the prediction of spectral properties. Where the transition is related to a chemical process (as in charge transfer spectra) they could also be useful as standard processes for elucidating transition structures. They are also of use in studying the transmission of polar effects from substituent to the site of the energy change and providing secondary definitions of various a parameters. [Pg.42]

The absence of a break-point at the predicted value of the polarity parameter can in principle exclude an association intermediate (N-U2".A Nuf) and thus indicate that the mechanism involves only a single transition structure. [Pg.170]

A promising recent development concerns the use of semiempirical NDDO methods with specific reaction parameters (NDDO-SRP) [144-147] in direct dynamics calculations. In these studies the parameters in the standard AMI method are carefully adjusted to optimize the potential surface for an individual reaction or a set of related reactions (typically allowing parameter variations up to 10% from the original values). When adjusting with respect to experimental data, NDDO-SRP is required to reproduce the exothermicity and the barrier (or rate constant) of the reaction investigated. Under these circumstances NDDO-SRP then predicts reasonable transition structures and force fields for the reaction which is consistent with previous experience [48,49]. Direct dynamics calculations on such NDDO-SRP surfaces have provided very encourag-... [Pg.731]


See other pages where Parameter 80 values, transition structure is mentioned: [Pg.67]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.74]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.368 , Pg.369 , Pg.370 ]




SEARCH



Parameter 80 values, transition

Parameter 80 values, transition metal electronic structure

Parameter value

Structural parameters

Structure parameters

Transition parameters

Transitional value

© 2024 chempedia.info