Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Pairing Preferences

Ion Pairing Preferences in Water Depend on Charge Densities [Pg.588]

The Hofmeister Series Nonpolar Solvation in Salt Solutions [Pg.589]

The h drophobic effect describes the unusual thermodynamics of the disaffin-ity of oil for water. In cold water, nonpolar solutes induce structuring in first-shell waters. Increasing the temperature melts out this structure. Ions, too, can cause the ordering of w-aters, by an electrostatic mechanism. The charge densities on ions have a role in determining their heats of dissolution and the viscosities of aqueous solutions, and can modulate the solubilities of oil in salt water. [Pg.589]

The forces of micelle formation. A micelle contains 80 sodium dodecyl sulfate molecules, each of which has a headgroup with one negative charge at the surface. The micellar radius is 13 A. [Pg.590]

Icebergs are less ordered than ice. Compare the entropy per molecule of inserting a nonpolar solute into water with the entropy of freezing w ater. [Pg.590]


Fig. 4.3 Triplex invasion by homopyrimidine PNA oligomers. One PNA strand binds via Watson-Crick base pairing (preferably in the antiparallel orientation), while the other binds via Hoogsteen base pairing (preferably in the parallel orientation). It is usually advanta-... Fig. 4.3 Triplex invasion by homopyrimidine PNA oligomers. One PNA strand binds via Watson-Crick base pairing (preferably in the antiparallel orientation), while the other binds via Hoogsteen base pairing (preferably in the parallel orientation). It is usually advanta-...
Figure 1. Illustration of lone electron pair preferences in alcohol dimers, cooperative and anticooperative binding sites for a third monomer, ring strain and steric repulsion in alcohol trimers, alternation of residues in alcohol tetramers, and chain, branch, and cyclic hydrogen bond topologies in larger clusters. Figure 1. Illustration of lone electron pair preferences in alcohol dimers, cooperative and anticooperative binding sites for a third monomer, ring strain and steric repulsion in alcohol trimers, alternation of residues in alcohol tetramers, and chain, branch, and cyclic hydrogen bond topologies in larger clusters.
C. Emmeluth, V. Dyczmons, T. Kinzel, P. Botschwina, M. A. Suhm, and M. Yanez, Combined jet relaxation and quantum chemical study of the pairing preferences of ethanol. Phys. Chem. [Pg.46]

The trioxolane ring twists in order to maximize overlap of oxygen lone pairs with the lone pairs prefer to lie in a staggered orientation to minimize electrostatic repulsion <93Mi 4i6-03>. [Pg.592]

Fooks HM, Martin ACR, Woolfson DN, Sessions RB, Hutchinson EG. Amino acid pairing preferences in parallel /3-sheets in proteins. J Mol Biol 2006 356 32-44. [Pg.388]

Further calculations were performed on 2,3-diaza-1,3-butadiene with different heterodienophiles such as ethene, formaldehyde and formaldimine showing the same exo oxygen or nitrogen lone pair preference [49] as well as on the nitro-soethene/ethene system [50]. Recently, ab initio studies have also been performed for the Lewis acid catalysed hetero Diels-Alder reaction of isoprene and sulfur dioxide by Sordo [51]. [Pg.11]

The salts (-l-)-[AsAmylBnEtPh]Br, (-)-[AsBn(n-Bu)EtPh]Cl and (-l-)-[AsBnEt(n-Pentyl)Ph]Br were reported to completely racemize over ca 1 h at 20 °C in chloroform. A dissociation-equilibrium between the salt and the tertiary arsine and alkyl halide was put forward as the mechanism of the racemization, where the alkyl halide was considered to attack the tertiary arsine from the side of the lone-pair (preferred) or from the side of the plane of the three substituents . It was stated that the racemization would be facilitated by raising the temperature due to inversion of the tertiary arsine in line with earlier calculations . This notion of facile dissociation-equilibrium in arsonium salts, first suggested in 1921 and carried through until 1964 , was finally put to rest in 1965, however, when it was shown that the salts (—)-[AsBn( -Bu)EtPh]X (where X = Cl or Br) in chloroform or ethyl acetate were completely stable for days . Moreover,... [Pg.140]

In the trigonal bipyramidal arrangement, lone pairs prefer the equatorial positions, in which electron repulsions are minimized. [Pg.26]

Lewis structure F—Xe -F. The electron arrangement is trigonal bipyramidal the shape is linear (lone pairs prefer the equatorial positions). The bond angle is 180°, the bond dipoles cancel, and the molecule is nonpolar Xe F. [Pg.27]

MD studies on the solvation of sodium chloride in [C4mim][NTf2] were performed by Sieffert and Wipff [110]. Dissociation of a single [Na][Cl] ion pair in ILs and in conventional solvents, [Na][Cl] condensation in the IL, and solvation of [Na] [Cl] microcrystals were investigated. Characteristics of the solid/IL interface was analyzed. The single ion pair preferred to be associated rather than dissociated. In a concentrated [Na][Cl] solution the ions spontaneously associated. Simulations of Na13Cl 4 and Na14Cl 3 microcrystals in the IL showed that both remain associated [110]. The crystal surface was solvated by the less polar IL components rather than by the polar ones. In the first IL layer the ions were ordered rather parallel to the surface, whereas in the second layer they were more perpendicular. The solvation of the crystal seemed to be rather apolar due to the mismatch between the IL and the crystal ions [110]. [Pg.242]

C) Use a mixture of cationic and anionic surfactants. Li synthesized MCM-48 using a mixture of CTAB and Ci2H25COONa as template.1126 The pair of cationic and anionic surfactants has higher hydrophobicity compared with a pure cationic surfactant. The pair prefer to penetrate to the core of the micelle to a certain degree, increase the packing parameter g. [Pg.507]

Expression (5.7) is, in fact, built into the routine measurement of pH with a commercial pH meter. Such meters have a scale graduated in pH units, obviating the need to convert volts to pH units. Prior to pH measurement, the buffer solution and unknown solution are brought to the same temperature. The temperature compensation dial on the meter is then turned to that temperature. This sets the meter with the appropriate Nernst-factor value for pH respon.se at the temperature of measurement. The pH and reference electrode pair (preferably available in a single, combination pH electrode) are then immersed in a buffer solution of known pH, and the meter is set to that pH. Immersion of the electrodes in the unknown solution then yields that solution s pH. [Pg.150]

M. Wilmanns, D. Eisenberg. Inverse protein folding by the residue pair preference profile method estimating the correctness of alignments of structurally compatibile sequences. Prot. Eng. 1995, 8, 627-639. [Pg.234]

The neighbor-dependent sequence analysis of proteins revealed that the amino acid pair preference for secondary structures has its unique pattern and that such pattern are not always predictable by assuming proportional contributions from the propensity values of the individual amino acids (25,26). Some of those sequence patterns are most pronounced in some subgroups of secondary structures, such as the short loop and helix subgroups. Our analysis also yielded a series of amino acid dyads that showed preference for a particular secondary... [Pg.259]

Morishima et al. (171) measured NMR contact shifts for Ni (2-I-) (acac)2 complexes of piperidine(I), 4-methylpiperidine (II), iV-methyl-piperi-dine(III), 1,4-dimethylpiperidine(IV), and quinuclidene(V). The P carbon atom of the ligand in complexes (III) and (IV) show an attenuation of the contact shift relative to this same carbon in (I) and (II). The authors rationalized this discrepency on the basis of the orientation of the lone pair on nitrogen. For complexes (I) and (II) the lone pair prefers an equitorial position, whereas, in (III) and (IV) it prefers an axial position. For (I) and (II) a zig-zag path of distribution is necessary. Apparently (see data in Table LVII) the zig-zag path is more favorable. For quinuclidene (V) the y carbon shows a downfield shift (positive spin density) (opposite to I-IV). The downfield shift may be accounted for by spin delocalization through space involving the lone-pair electrons. [Pg.400]

Paired preference test In this test the assessors is presented with two coded products simultaneously and asked to identify the sample that it is preferred and offer a reason for preference. The test design ensures that the two possible sequences of samples (AB and BA) are balanced across panelists, so that each sample is assessed equally often in first or second position. Usually consumers are obliged to make a choice also when they have no preferences. However, there is a nonforced preference version of the test. A no-preference option is used in the score sheet and reported although usually excluded from the analysis. [Pg.4425]

Methods can be classified as either analytical or affective. Analytical methods are either discriminative or descriptive they provide product analytical information. Affective tests are hedonic or paired preference they provide product liking or preference information. These methods provide different kinds of information and should not be combined, a topic discussed later in this section. These methods are the foundation on which none evaluation has developed. Each provides different kinds of information and none of them is superior to another in terms of sensitivity. [Pg.31]

There are two basic methods, hedonic and paired preference. The 9-pt hedonic scale (see Fig. 2.1) is a method that has been used for more than half a century and used successfully in many countries by all ages of consumers (see Peryam and Pilgrim, 1957). It is interesting to note that the scale is bipolar with a neutral center of neither like or dislike in use, however, subjects respond as if it were an equal-interval scale, thus enabling use of the analysis of variance (AOV) and related statistical methods. [Pg.36]

Figure 2.2 An example of the paired preference scorecard. In this example 80 subjects participated. Test was a balanced design and results are summarized on the right showing responses by serving order which is pooled for the analysis. Figure 2.2 An example of the paired preference scorecard. In this example 80 subjects participated. Test was a balanced design and results are summarized on the right showing responses by serving order which is pooled for the analysis.
One of the central ideas of general chemistry is the notion of an electron pair (i.e., two electrons of opposite spins that occupy a certain region of space). Understanding chemistry means knowing the role of these electron pairs in individual molecules (which is directly related to their structure) and what may happen to them when two molecules are in contact (chemical reactions). Where in a molecule do electron pairs prefer to be This is the role of the ELF, which may be seen as an idea of visualization that helps chemists to elaborate what is known as chemical intuition ( understanding ), an important qualitative generalization that supports any practical chemist s action such as planning chemical synthesis. [Pg.701]


See other pages where Pairing Preferences is mentioned: [Pg.322]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.889]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.966]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.701]    [Pg.1025]    [Pg.671]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.36]   


SEARCH



Paired preference method

© 2024 chempedia.info