Packings hydrophobicity

Ithough knowledge-based potentials are most popular, it is also possible to use other types potential function. Some of these are more firmly rooted in the fundamental physics of iteratomic interactions whereas others do not necessarily have any physical interpretation all but are able to discriminate the correct fold from decoy structures. These decoy ructures are generated so as to satisfy the basic principles of protein structure such as a ose-packed, hydrophobic core [Park and Levitt 1996]. The fold library is also clearly nportant in threading. For practical purposes the library should obviously not be too irge, but it should be as representative of the different protein folds as possible. To erive a fold database one would typically first use a relatively fast sequence comparison lethod in conjunction with cluster analysis to identify families of homologues, which are ssumed to have the same fold. A sequence identity threshold of about 30% is commonly... 

Figure 4.3 In most a/p-barrel structures the eight p strands of the barrel enclose a tightly packed hydrophobic core formed entirely by side chains from the p strands. The core is arranged in three layers, with each layer containing four side chains from alternate p strands. The schematic diagram shows this packing arrangement in the a/p barrel of the enzyme glycolate oxidase, the structure of which was determined by Carl Branden and colleagues in Uppsala, Sweden.

There is one exception to the rule that requires bulky hydrophobic residues to fill the interior of eight-stranded a/p barrels in order to form a tightly packed hydrophobic core. The coenzyme Biz-dependent enzyme methylmalonyl-coenzyme A mutase, the x-ray structure of which was determined by Phil Evans and colleagues at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular... 

Over 20 different methods have been proposed for predictions of secondary stmcture they can be categorized in two broad classes. The empirical statistical methods use parameters obtained from analyses of known sequences and tertiary stmctures. All such methods are based on the assumption that the local sequence in a short region of the polypeptide chain determines local stmcture as we have seen, this is not a universally valid assumption. The second group of methods is based on stereochemical criteria, such as compactness of form with a tightly packed hydrophobic core and a polar surface. Three frequently used methods are the empirical approaches of P.Y. Chou and G.D. Fasman and of J. Gamier, D.J. Osguthorpe and B. Robson (the GOR method), and third, the stereochemical method of V.l. him. 

Column Packing Hydrophobicity Index(a) Silanophilic Index(b) ... 

The principal defining properties of the molten globule are as follows (Arai and Kuwajima, 2000) (1) substantial secondary structure (2) no significant tertiary structure (3) structure only slightly expanded from the native state (10—30% increase in radius of gyration) (4) a loosely packed hydrophobic core with increased solvent accessibility. The first two criteria are readily assessed by far- and near-UV CD, respectively. Therefore, CD has been extensively applied to the detection and characterization of molten globules. 

Methods based upon physicochemical criteria, such as fold compactness (i.e. the generation of a folded form displaying a tightly packed hydrophobic core and a polar surface). 

Bamase (Figure 19.11), the 110-residue RNase that is secreted from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, is of a + structure.50 It has a major a helix running from residues 6 to 18 (a helix, two smaller helixes in the first half of the sequence, and five strands of antiparallel sheet in the second half. There is a well-packed hydrophobic core formed by helixj packing onto one face of the sheet. All the peptidy 1-proline bonds are in the trans conformation. There are obvious regions... 

The intermediate purification step was developed by screening pre-packed hydrophobic interaction media (RESOURCE HIC Test Kit) to select the optimum medium for the separation (results not shown). RESOURCE ISO was selected on the basis of the resolution achieved. In this intermediatestep, shown in Figure 15, the maximum possible speed for separation was sacrificed in order to achieve higher resolution and allow significant reduction of remaining impurities. 

Parameters defining the quality of the interface such as enzyme orientation, substrate packing, hydrophobicity, charge density, and film pressure come into consideration [2-4], and terms characterizing enzyme activities such as Vmax and Km have different meanings. 

---