Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Packed towers flooding point

The derivation of equations 13.34 and 13.35 has been carried out assuming that u0 is constant and independent of the flowrates, up to and including the flooding-point. This in turn assumes that the droplet size is constant and that no coalescence occurs as the hold-up increases. Whilst this assumption is essentially valid in properly designed spray towers, this is certainly not the case with packed towers. Equations 13.34 and 13.35 cannot therefore be used to predict the flooding-point in packed towers and a more empirical procedure must be adopted. [Pg.753]

The correlation of Eckert (Fig. 13.37) combines a pressure drop relation and safe flow rates insofar as staying away from the flooding point is concerned. A flooding line corresponds to pressure drops in excess of 2 in. water/ft. In use, a pressure drop is selected, and the correlation is applied to find the corresponding mass velocity G from which the tower diameter then is calculated. Another correlation recommended by a manufacturer of packings appears in Figure 13.40. Example 13.16 compares these correlations for a specific case they do not compare any more closely than could be expected from the scatter of flooding data. [Pg.433]

Flood-Point Definition In 1966, Silvey and Keller [Chem. Eng. Progr. 62(1), 68 (1966)] listed 10 different flood point definitions that have been used by different literature sources. A later survey (Kister and Gill, Proceedings of Chemeca 92, p. 185-2, Canberra, Australia, 1992) listed twice that many. As Silvey and Keller pointed out, the existence of so many definitions puts into question what constitutes flooding in a packed tower, and at what gas rate it occurs. Symptoms used to identify flood in these definitions include appearance of liquid on top of the bed, excessive entrainment, a sharp rise... [Pg.56]

A packing pressure drop of 1.5 in/ft is approximately 95% of column packing flood. At 2.0 in/ft of pressure drop DP, most random packed towers are at the flood point. It is thus prudent and good practice to keep the limiting D, at 1.5 in/ft or less. [Pg.113]

Flood point Packed towers are usually designed to 70 to 80 percent of the Good point velocity (17,55,56,96). This practice provides sufficient margin to allow for uncertainties associated with the flood-point concept (Sec. 8.2.3) and prediction (Sec. 8.2.6) and to keep the design point away from the region at which efficiency rapidly diminishes (just below the flood point). [Pg.507]

Pressure drop at flooding point in packed towers... [Pg.695]

Flooding velocities in packed towers. If the flow rate of either the dispersed phase or the continuous phase is held constant and that of the other phase gradually increased, a point is reached where the dispersed phase coalesces, the holdup of that phase increases, and finally both phases leave together through the continuous-phase outlet. The effect, like the corresponding action in an absorption column,... [Pg.627]


See other pages where Packed towers flooding point is mentioned: [Pg.57]    [Pg.692]    [Pg.692]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.1594]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.756]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.693]    [Pg.697]    [Pg.738]    [Pg.1416]    [Pg.693]    [Pg.697]    [Pg.901]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.1610]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.164]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.697 , Pg.698 , Pg.699 , Pg.700 , Pg.701 ]




SEARCH



Flood-packings

Flooding packed tower

Flooding point

Packed towers

Packed towers packing

Tower flooding

Tower packings

© 2024 chempedia.info