Package geometry

Shannon et al. developed a flow model which, using a finite difference method, predicts pressure and velocity profiles based on user-defined package geometry, permeability profile and fluid properties. The flow model was obtained by combining the continuity equation for fluid flow in a porous medium ... 

The solution was accomplished using finite difference techniques. The resulting model allows the user to specify upstream and downstream pressures, package geometry (inner radius, outer radius and height), radial and axial permeabilities, and fluid viscosity. Variable radial and axial permeabilities are assigned in order to simulate package density effects. 

The work of Shannon et al is valuable for the investigation of the influence of package geometry and permeability on flow properties within the package. However, they did not consider flow properties before approaching the surface of the package, which, if significant, can affect the flow behaviour in the system. 

It must be noted that, since this is a three-dimensional model, it is convenient to use finite element method analysis to investigate the dynamic behaviour of the systems with any different package geometry, or any flow direction, by defining the exact package geometry, and appropriate boundary conditions. The details are discussed in the following chapter. 

Package geometry plays a very important role in uniformity of the dyeing process and affects other parameters. Specifically the following points should be noted ... 

In modem quantum chemistry packages, one can obtain moleculai basis set at the optimized geometry, in which the wave functions of the molecular basis are expanded in terms of a set of orthogonal Gaussian basis set. Therefore, we need to derive efficient fomiulas for calculating the above-mentioned matrix elements, between Gaussian functions of the first and second derivatives of the Coulomb potential ternis, especially the second derivative term that is not available in quantum chemistry packages. Section TV is devoted to the evaluation of these matrix elements. 

Z-matriccs arc commonly used as input to quantum mechanical ab initio and serai-empirical) calculations as they properly describe the spatial arrangement of the atoms of a molecule. Note that there is no explicit information on the connectivity present in the Z-matrix, as there is, c.g., in a connection table, but quantum mechanics derives the bonding and non-bonding intramolecular interactions from the molecular electronic wavefunction, starting from atomic wavefiinctions and a crude 3D structure. In contrast to that, most of the molecular mechanics packages require the initial molecular geometry as 3D Cartesian coordinates plus the connection table, as they have to assign appropriate force constants and potentials to each atom and each bond in order to relax and optimi-/e the molecular structure. Furthermore, Cartesian coordinates are preferable to internal coordinates if the spatial situations of ensembles of different molecules have to be compared. Of course, both representations are interconvertible. 

Inc, [34], is an example of a software package that can calculate 3D geometries, chemical shifts, and coupling constants using semi-empirical approaches (Figure 10.2-2). 

One very popular technique is an adaptation of the Born model for orbital-based calculations by Cramer and Truhlar, et. al. Their solvation methods (denoted SMI, SM2, and so on) are designed for use with the semiempirical and ah initio methods. Some of the most recent of these methods have a few parameters that can be adjusted by the user in order to customize the method for a specific solvent. Such methods are designed to predict ACsoiv and the geometry in solution. They have been included in a number of popular software packages including the AMSOL program, which is a derivative of AMPAC created by Cramer and Truhlar. 

---