Order of events

Synthesis This wae how Kutney did it - there are other orders of events. 

Saturated hydrocarbons were a problem because they have no functionality. It can be just as bad when a molecule has several functional groups aU apparently unrelated. Bisabolene (TM 384) has three double bonds, aU rather widely separated. Comment on possible strategies in terms of the hkely origin of each double bond and the probable order of events. 

If you work through both orders of events it turns out better to do c first and b next ... 

This will clearly be made somehow by discormections a and b but the order of events is important. We must discoimect first, that is synthesise last, the bond with the wrong orientation - i.e. meta to the t-butyl group. The reaction will then be intramolecular and orientation doesn t matter. This gives us 399B, and 1 show one possible route from that. 

Functional and hardware relationships between systems are considered in selecting the order of event tree headings. Systems that depend on the operation of other systems in order to perform their function should be listed after the other systems. For example, the decay-heat removal system... 

Now that you appreciate the reasons why a particular order of events is followed, study the syntheses of benzocaine (p T 6) and plperonal (p T 9), The benzoeaine synthesis involves a great deal of FGl two of the four steps are FGls. This is because two FGs required for the synthesis (NO and CO H) are m-directing and so cannot be used to direct substitution where it is needed ( ). (guideline 1 in Chapter T 3). Nitro is the group to put in last (guideline 2) and FGl solves the orientation problem (guideline 3). 

The order of events In this synthesis can be varied - one possibility is to keep the nitrile until after the oxazole has been made. The acid chloride is used for the cyclisation. 

But how do we convert (41) to (40) Is there an order of events which will ensure the right isomer Adding a one-carbon electrophile, e.g. to give (42), is easy, but brominatlon could now occur anywhere. 

The different chapters in Volume 24 have been arranged in such a way that some justice is given to history and the chronological order of events in materials-chirality. 

A ordering of events such as those in a review of polymer science is necessarily influenced by the opinions of those who have gone before. In this spirit the author desires to recognize the reviews of Flory (10), McGrew (86), and Olby (31). However, the best indicator of the thinking of those times can be obtained by the literature of the day. A paper by Carothers titled, simply, "Polymerization" (95) is representative, and was used extensively in preparation of this paper. 

During complement activation via the classical pathway, nine major complement components (designated C1-C9) become activated in a sequential process, the product of each activation step being an enzyme that catalyses a subsequent step in the cascade. The purpose of the cascade is twofold firstly, a sequential activation process decreases the possibility of nonspecific activation secondly, the initial response is amplified so that large numbers of complement molecules become activated in response to small amounts of initial signal. The order of events is as follows. 

The irreversible elimination drives the reversible aldol reaction and gives a favourable conjugated ketone in a favourable six-membered ring. On paper, one could also draw an acceptable mechanism in which the order of events was reversed. This is not so neat, and would require generating an enolate anion y to the a,P-unsaturated ketone formed by the first aldol-dehydration sequence. 

Also like syntheses, a clear order of events is conveyed in the procedure. Novice writers inappropriately use words such as first, second, next, and then (examples of ordinal language) to convey the order of events more experienced writers learn to omit most ordinal language. Consider the following example ... 

Guidelines for conveying the order of events in a Methods section... 

This raises the question about the order of events in the active site of FF-Tu ... 

Then and than have very different meanings nonetheless, novice writers often mistakenly use them interchangeably. To communicate without ambiguity, it is important that these two words be used properly. Essentially, you need to memorize which one is which and then use them correctly in your written work. Note that then is used only sparingly in expert scientific writing because the order of events (e.g., first, second, then) is generally implied and does not need to be stated explicitly. 

The exact order of events leading to these familiar aperies still remains obscure, however. Cvetsnovic has called attention to the similarity between the photolytio decomposition of ethylene oxide and the fete of energy-rich intermediates formed during high temperature catalytic ethylene oxidation. 00 4 1... 

The partial reaction of the lsO exchange from [,80]P to L-glutamine was 5-7 times faster than net ATP formation. This establishes (along with the equilibrium isotope exchange data) the following order of events with the E. coli enzyme. 

Operating within the framework of the Chauvin mechanism, the main consideration for the reaction mechanism is the order of events in terms of addition, loss and substitution of ligands around the ruthenium alkylidene centre. Additionally, there is a need for two pathways (see above), both being first order in diene, one with a first-order dependence on [Ru] and the other (which is inhibited by added Cy3P) with a half-order dependence on [Ru]. From the analysis of the reaction kinetics and the empirical rate equation thus derived, the sequence of elementary steps via two pathways was proposed, one non-dissociative (I) and the other dissociative (II), as shown in Scheme 12.20. The mechanism-derived rate equation is also shown in the scheme and it can thus be seen how the constants A and B relate to elementary forward rate constants and equilibria in the proposed mechanism. 

The object and collaboration diagrams are input to the OF-FMEA method. From this input we develop formal specification of component interactions. For this purpose we use CSP. Each component of the collaboration diagram becomes a CSP process with input and output channels as shown in the diagram. In addition to this we develop formal models of safety requirements of the system. The requirements are derived from the railway safety regulations. Each requirement is modeled as a CSP process and imposes some restrictions on the ordering of events in the system. The requirements refer to the events that are visible on Level 4 of our decomposition. 

Alternating with instructional chapters, like the last one, will be strategy chapters, like this one, which discuss reasons for choosing one route rather than another in other words the overall plan rather than the individual steps. In this chapter we shall examine the order of events, using the synthesis of aromatic compounds as examples. The details are specific but the guidelines general. 

Check that a rational order of events has been chosen (chapter 3). 

As the alcohol 22 was available it was simply a case of putting in the ethyl group. Of course the alternative order of events might be better. Since the reduction to the ds-alkene can be done either before or after incorporation into the cis-jasmone skeleton, 22 was also transformed5 into the propargylic bromide 24. 

Reductive removal of the amide carbonyl with borane and Mannich closure of the middle ring give P-lycorane 72. A feature of this synthesis is that by changing the order of events and by adding ArLi with chelation control, all three lycoranes can be made selectively. 

---