Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Order determination methods

K. A. Wear, R. F. Wagner, and B. S. Gaira, A comparison of autotegressive spectral estimation algorithms and order determination methods in ultrasonic tissue characterization, IEEE Trans Ultrason. Ferroelect. Frequency Control 42 709-716 (1995). [Pg.468]

Therefore, the slope of the linear plot Cg versus gives the ratio kj/kj. Knowing kj -i- kj and kj/kj, the values of kj and kj ean be determined as shown in Figure 3-10. Coneentration profiles of eom-ponents A, B, and C in a bateh system using the differential Equations 3-95, 3-96, 3-97 and the Runge-Kutta fourth order numerieal method for the ease when Cgg =Cco = 0 nd kj > kj are reviewed in Chapter 5. [Pg.135]

The following examples review some complex reactions and determine the concentrations history for a specified period using the Runge-Kutta fourth order numerical method. [Pg.295]

Equations 5-110, 5-112, 5-113, and 5-114 are first order differential equations and the Runge-Kutta fourth order numerical method is used to determine the concentrations of A, B, C, and D, with time, with a time increment h = At = 0.5 min for a period of 10 minutes. The computer program BATCH57 determines the concentration profiles at an interval of 0.5 min for 10 minutes. Table 5-6 gives the results of the computer program and Figure 5-16 shows the concentration profiles of A, B, C, and D from the start of the batch reaction to the final time of 10 minutes. [Pg.298]

A reaction order determined by the methods shown in Tables 2-1 and 2-2 and Fig. 2-5 is called an order with respect to concentration. ... [Pg.28]

Phosphoric Acid. The 2nd-order rate method for analyzing the TGA data was statistically best (Table IV) for the cellulose/H PO samples. This suggests that the conclusions from a prior study which assumed a lst-order reaction (29) may need to be reexamined. While Wilkinson s approximation method gave high r values, the rate constant is determined by the intercept rather than the slope in this method. Thus, the standard deviation of the rates determined by Wilkinson s approximation method is still relatively high when compared to the other methods. In addition, the reaction order as determined by the Wilkinson approximation method was unrealistically high, ranging from 2.6 to 5.8. [Pg.357]

Similar iterative schemes were used to determine the MO s for multiconfigurational wave functions, in the early implementations. Fock-like operators were constructed and diagonalized iteratively. The convergence problems with these methods are, however, even more severe in the MCSCF case, and modem methods are not based on this approach. The electronic energy is instead considered to be a function of the variational parameters of the wave function - the Cl coefficients and the molecular orbital coefficients. Second order (or approximate second order) iterative methods are then used to find a stationary point on the energy surface. [Pg.197]

For the demonstration of the capabilities of this method we chose the Buckminster fullerene Cgo. Since this molecule consists only of carbon atoms the net atomic charges of all atoms and hence the polarization are zero. The calculated chemical shift parameters depend only on the parameters of the unpolarized bonds and the 7t-bond order. The rc-bond order determines the extent of the 7t parameters contribution. [Pg.98]

In order to eliminate the problems with the invariance, we proposed some time ago a topological approximation based on the so-called overlap determinant method [43]. This approximation is based on the transformation matrix T that describes the mutual phase relations of atomic orbitals centred on molecules R and P, and thus plays in this approach the same role as the so-called assigning tables in the overlap determinant method (Eq. 4)... [Pg.3]

The computer program PLUG51 employing the Runge-Kutta fourth order numerical method was used to determine the conversions and the compositions of the components. Applying the Runge-Kutta method, Equations 5-328 and 5-329 in differential forms are... [Pg.385]

In order to correctly design analytical procedures used for the detection of food allergens, it is necessary to have basic knowledge of food product chemistry to know how to collect, prepare, and store food samples to be able to fragment, mix, disintegrate, and extract samples to know (or be able to find quickly) relevant food quality standards and admissible contents of particular food ingredients and finally to understand precision of determinations, their sensitivity, and detection threshold levels, reproducibility, and errors of determination methods. In addition, it is essential to be able to gather the results of assays, process them with the aid of a computer and statistical methods, and to present the analytically derived data. [Pg.88]

One possible way of limiting the complexity of such calculations regardless of the size of the system, is through the use of perturbation theory, where the maximum number of correlated electrons and the maximum number of nuclear centers that appear in the calculation are determined by the perturbation order. If such a calculation yields the desired accuracy when carried to a particular order, that order determines the maximum complexity of the calculation. One example of such a perturbation theory[69], a variant of the Z x expansion method, has been applied to Hj with promising results for such a low-order calculation. [Pg.383]

Introduction to Derivatization For many years derivatization by alkylation -especially as ethylation, but also as propylation - has been applied to transform Hg species into volatile Hg species before measurement with hyphenated techniques [2, 50, 52]. Sodium tetraphenylborate (NaBPh4) was also used for derivatization prior to measurement with GC-MIP-AED [53], Studies of possible species transformation, for example, during the analytical procedure, have been carried out with isotope-specific determination methods. The results showed that a direct ethylation of Me-Hg in an atmospheric precipitation sample by NaBEt4 produced no significant amount of artifactual Me-Hg [54]. Others investigated the species transformation processes in synthetic solutions to simulate environmental matrices. From the experiments it could be concluded that the species conversion, for example, of Me-Hg into zerovalent Hg, depends on the concentration levels of the halide [2]. Furthermore, the procedural order is of great importance, for example, ethylation should be done after addition of the organic phase to avoid species transformation [55]. [Pg.716]

The pH of the fabric and the solution affects the amount of formaldehyde extracted. A neutral pH minimises the amount determined. Higher extraction temperatures and longer extraction times increase the amount of formaldehyde extracted owing to hydrolysis of the crosslinker bond to cellulose (Fig. 5.4 and Fig. 5.5). In many cases the usual order of these formaldehyde content values related to the determination method is Shirley I > AATCC 112 > Japan Law 112 > DIN 54 260. [Pg.69]

Disadvantages arise mainly from the complexity of the statistical algorithms and the fact that fitting models to data is time consuming. The first-order (EO) method used in NONMEM also results in biased estimates of parameters, especially when the distribution of inter individual variability is specified incorrectly. The first-order conditional estimation (EOCE) procedure is more accurate but is even more time consuming. The objective function and adequacy of the model are based in part on the residuals, which for NONMEM are determined based on the predicted concentrations for the mean pharmacokinetic parameters rather than on the predicted concentrations for each individual. Therefore, the residuals are confounded by intraindividual, inter individual, and linearization errors. [Pg.134]

The coefficients of the above method are determined in order the method integrates exactly any linear combination of the functions ... [Pg.201]


See other pages where Order determination methods is mentioned: [Pg.27]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.681]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.681]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.614]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.732]    [Pg.1020]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.99 ]




SEARCH



Order determination

Order determining

Order, determination Differential methods

Order, determination Integrated methods

© 2024 chempedia.info