Orbitals distribution within shells

The square ot the radial part of th(e wavefunction of an orbital provides information about how tho electron density within the orbital varies as a function of distance from the nucleus. These radial distribution functions show that, in a given principle shell, the maximum electron density is reached nearer to the nucleus as the quantum number I increases. However, the proportion of the total electron density which is near to the nucleus is larger for an electron in an s orbital than in a p orbital. 

Let us consider the derivation of the electron configuration of the elements from lithium to neon which constitute the second period of Men el eff s classification. The distribution of the electrons in the ground positions of the atoms is given below. In the atom of lithium, the first two electrons occupy the u position, the third electron according to the Pauli principle must fall into the electron shell having the main quantum number equal to two. The electron accordingly occupies the position of minimum energy within this shell, which is the 2s orbital. 

Is it possible to improve the results for NiH on the CASSCF level of accuracy by extending the active subspace The answer to this question is most probably no . The next important feature to include would be the radial correlation effects in the 3d shell of the nickel atom. The active subspace then has to include two sets of 3d orbitals together with the NiH electrons distributed among 12 orbitals. Such a calculation is well within the limits of the present capabilities, but it is not at all certain that it would give a balanced description of the correlation effects of the entire potential curve ... 

Often, it is more meaningful physically to make plots of the radial distribution function, P(r), of an atomic orbital, since this display emphasizes the spatial reality of the probability distribution of the electron density, as shell structure about the nucleus. To establish the radial distribution function we need to calculate the probability of an electron, in a particular orbital, exhibiting coordinates on a thin shell of width, Ar, between r and r - - Ar about the nucleus, i.e. within the volume element defined in Figure 1.6. 

The principle of both of these techniques is to excite the atoms of the substance to be analyzed by bombarding the sample with sufficiently energetic X-rays/y-rays or charged particles. The ionization (photoionization for XRF and ionization caused due to Coulomb-interaction in case of PIXE) of inner-shell electrons is produced by the photons and charged particles, respectively. When this interaction removes an electron from a specimen s atom, frequently an electron from an outer shell (or orbital) occupies the vacancy. The distribution of electrons in the ionized atom is then out of equilibrium and within an extremely short time s) returns to the normal state, by transitions... 

The plots we have just seen represent probability density. However, they are a bit misleading because they seem to imply that the electton is most likely to be found at the nucleus. To get a better idea of where the electron is most likely to be found, we can use a plot called the radial distribution function, shown in Figure 7.25 for the 1 orbital. The radial distribution function represents the total probability of finding the electron within a thin spherical shell at a distance rfrom the nucleus. 

A FIGURE 7.25 The Radial Distribution Function for the Is Orbital The curve shows the total probability of finding the electron within a thin shell at a distance r from the nucleus. 

Unlike HE molecular orbitals, the natural orbitals are not restricted to a low-level approximation, hut are rigorously defined for any theoretical level, up to and including the exact P. As eigenfunctions of a physical (Hermitian) operator, the NOs automatically form a complete orthonormal set, able to describe every nuance of the exact P and associated density distribution, whereas the occupied MOs are seriously mcomplete without augmentation by virtual MOs. Furthermore, the occupancies , of NOs are not restricted to integer values (as are those of MOs), but can vary continuously within the limits imposed by tbe Pauli exclusion principle, namely, for closed-shell spatial orbitals. 

---