Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Orbital interaction theory limitations

Orbital interaction theory, 34-71 diagram, 40, 42, 47 limitations, 69-71 sigma bonds, 72-86... [Pg.338]

Optical purity, by NMR, 13, 14 Orbital correlation diagrams, 196-203 cycloaddition reactions, 197-196 Diels-Alder, 198 ethylene -E ethylene, 198 electrocyclic reactions, 198-200 butadienes, 199 hexatrienes, 199 limitations, 203 photochemical, 201 Woodward-Hoffinann, 197 Orbital energies, see also Energies, orbital degeneracy, 27, 90 Orbital interaction theory, 34-71 diagram, 40, 42, 47 limitations, 69-71 sigma bonds, 72-86 Orbitals... [Pg.338]

Presently, it will be a concern to review the basics of crystal field theory as a vehicle to understand the electronic features of transition metal atoms and ions in an octahedral environment. Thus is considered the limited basis of ten spinorbitals of the partially occupied atomic d-shell for the relevant transition metal. A particular choice of basis is made in order to obtain a convenient form for the spin-orbital interaction and to simplify the application of the point group symmetry. The e-type orbitals spin factors, a basis for the four-dimensional irreducible representation U. The Kramers pairs will be used ... [Pg.44]

The availability, only, of numerical data for the electron distributions in atoms other than hydrogen and the increasing complexity of that data with the atomic number of the atom, would be a serious limitation on our comprehension of atomic and molecular theory. In Chemistry the orbital is fundamental to the understanding of all the body of data that can be catalogued using the modem Periodic Table. It is an essential concept, too, in modem bonding theory, because general mles can be established, based on orbital interactions. [Pg.17]

Obviously the present study will have to be extended to include the energy of spin-forbidden transitions as well as low-spin configurations of transition metal compounds. The analysis of these spectra is somewhat more complicated since it involves the Racah parameter C and the possible influence of spin-orbit interactions. There is limited evidence (63) available which casts some doubt on the common practice to assume C=4B and to distinguish the quantities Bzs and Bss, at least within the configuration. In any case, ligand field theory should be applied with caution, and conclusions from apparent deviations between theory and experiment should be rigorously tested. [Pg.210]

As fits to the crystal spectra became more detailed, a lack of balance in the theory appeared. The Coulomb interactions within the 4f shell and the effects of configuration interaction to second order can be taken into account by means of the four Slater integrals F (4f, 4f), the three Trees parameters a, J5, y, and the six three-electron parameters T . In contrast to these 13 electrostatic parameters, the spin-orbit interaction, until 1968, was represented by the single parameter This scheme overlooks the terms that arise from the Breit interaction, which was developed on relativistic grounds to account for the fine structures of the multiplets of Hel Isnp (see Bethe and Salpeter 1957). In the non-relativisitc limit parts of the Breit interaction, such as the retardation of the Coulomb interaction and the magnetic interactions that exist between the electrons in virtue of their orbital motions, can be represented by adjustments to the electrostatic parameters. Two terms cannot be absorbed in that way the spin-spin interaction and the spin-other-orbit interaction Marvin (1947) showed that, for the configurations I", ... [Pg.153]

Chromium doped alumina, or ruby, is needless to say, a beautiful gemstone and known as the first solid-state laser in history. It is also a material of central importance to high pressure science since the ruby pressure gauge using its fluorescence lines is particularly popular in the diamond anvil cell (DAC) experiments. The electronic structure of ruby has been studied extensively based on the ligand-field theory with some additional parameters such as the trigonal-field parameter or the spin-orbit interaction parameter . However, the reports on the first-principles calculation of the multiplet structure of ruby are rather limited . The electronic structure of a-A]2 03 V + has also been studied in details based on a similar semiem-pirical approach . ... [Pg.279]

It has been suggested by Brooks (1983) that the deviations from theory observed in Np and Pu may in part be explained by the relativistic volume effect (sect. 3.8). If there is a preferential occupation of the j = f band, there is a 7 = contribution to the pressure in eq. (54), which, in the limit where the spin-orbit interaction is much larger than the 5f bandwidth, vanishes for Mf = 6, i.e. between Pu and Am. It turns out that this limit is not realized in any of the metals Np, Pu or Am, but the effect is sufficiently large to cause deviations from Pauli theory. Even with spin-orbit interaction included, the calculated radii of Np and Pu are too low compared with experiments. The remaining deviation may be due to correlation effects not included in our one-electron scheme. Both Np and Pu are known to be nearly magnetic (Brodsky 1978), which indicates strong f correlations. An additional reason for the discrepancies might be found in the crystal structures. [Pg.191]

There was an early semiempirical theory of relativistic effects with the main message that the changes in selection rules brought about by spin-orbit interaction have a large effect on chemical shifts. Some insight can also be gained from inspection of the Pauli limit of relativistic theory in the presence of a magnetic field. [Pg.1831]

To provide further insight why the SCF mean-field model in electronic structure theory is of limited accuracy, it can be noted that the average value of the kinetic energy plus the attraction to the Be nucleus plus the SCF interaction potential for one of the 2s orbitals of Be with the three remaining electrons in the s 2s configuration is ... [Pg.232]

These concepts play an important role in the Hard and Soft Acid and Base (HSAB) principle, which states that hard acids prefer to react with hard bases, and vice versa. By means of Koopmann s theorem (Section 3.4) the hardness is related to the HOMO-LUMO energy difference, i.e. a small gap indicates a soft molecule. From second-order perturbation theory it also follows that a small gap between occupied and unoccupied orbitals will give a large contribution to the polarizability (Section 10.6), i.e. softness is a measure of how easily the electron density can be distorted by external fields, for example those generated by another molecule. In terms of the perturbation equation (15.1), a hard-hard interaction is primarily charge controlled, while a soft-soft interaction is orbital controlled. Both FMO and HSAB theories may be considered as being limiting cases of chemical reactivity described by the Fukui ftinction. [Pg.353]


See other pages where Orbital interaction theory limitations is mentioned: [Pg.77]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.910]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.324]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.69 , Pg.70 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.69 , Pg.70 ]




SEARCH



Interacting limit

Interaction Theory

Orbital interaction theory

© 2024 chempedia.info