Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Optimisation gradient method

To use the method of modal contributions mentioned above would be a rather tricky task in the case of many compensators applied at many mass points. The interaction of original masses and dampers has to be taken into account, so a multidimensional optimisation problem has to be solved simultaneously. Here evolutionary approaches are superior to conventional gradient methods. [Pg.263]

Neural networks have also been used for the modelling of the function of all the variables that affect the key commercial terms of the paper mill. This information is used in the performance function and optimisation, in which the gradient method has been chosen due to its simplicity and reliability. [Pg.1068]

In the proposed framework, the objective functions are formulated in Excel for the modelled process in HYSYS. The multi-objective optimisation technique, e-constraint, is formulated with the Premium Solver Platform (by Frontline Systems), which is an upgrade of the standard Excel solver, that uses the standard non-linear GRG (Generalized Reduced Gradient) method. However, any other optimisation method, such as that mentioned earlier, can be easily formulated in Excel and evaluated accordingly. [Pg.273]

Based on chemical shifts and peak multiplicities, the on-flow HPLC-NMR characterisation of the majority of the components in the mixture of 27 tripeptides was achieved and demonstrated that this approach is likely to be an effective method for compound mixtures. The elution positions of all of the alanyl-containing peptides were determined, with the exception of A-M-M-NH2, which may have co-eluted with another peptide or may have been synthesised in a much smaller quantity. The only other tripeptides for which assignments have not been obtained are the MY2-NH2 isomers and two of the three M2Y-NH2 isomers. These eluted towards the end of the gradient run and are not as well resolved under these HPLC conditions. Additionally, with changes in the relative chemical shifts of the solvent signals, the intensities of the non-TV-terminal a-CH protons and the methionyl [3-methylene signals from these peptides may have been reduced by the effects of the solvent suppression irradiation of the water and acetonitrile resonances, respectively. With further optimisation of the elution conditions, it is possible that all 27 analytes could have been resolved and characterised. [Pg.55]

This system is ideal for automatic method for development and gradient optimisation. [Pg.6]

Gradient Evaluation Methods in NLP Based Optimisation Techniques... [Pg.140]

Evaluation of gradients is one of the major tasks in NLP based optimisation techniques. Rosen and Luus (1991) reviewed a number of methods for the evaluation of gradients for dynamic optimisation (optimal control) problems which uses piecewise constant optimal control profile. Some of these methods are discussed here. [Pg.140]

Here, three different gradient evaluation methods are discussed with reference to piecewise constant control discretization. If the final time is to be optimised then there are J=2NS variables in each control variable as shown in Equation 5.8. If r is the number of control variables in the system then the total number (a ) of decision variables in vector y (Equation 5.8) will be,... [Pg.141]

See the work of Vassiliadis (1993) for gradient evaluation methods for linear and exponentially varying control profile. See Rosen and Luus (1991) for gradient evaluations with the time invariant parameters (v) optimised and for guidelines for selecting the appropriate gradient evaluation method. [Pg.144]

Solution of optimisation problems using rigorous mathematical methods have received considerable attention in the past (Chapter 5). It is worth mentioning here that these techniques require the repetitive solution of the model equations (to evaluate the objective function and the constraints and their gradients with respect to the optimisation variables) and therefore computationally can be very expensive. [Pg.377]

Therefore, the dependence on the coefficients does not enter the gradient expression not for fixed orbitals, which is the classical Valence Bond approach and not for optimised orbitals, irrespective of whether they are completely optimised or if they are restricted to extend only over the atomic orbitals of one atom. If the wavefimction used in the orbital optimisation differs, additional work is required. This would apply to a multi-reference singles and doubles VB (cf. [20,21]). Then we would require a yet unimplemented coupled-VBSCF procedure. Note that the option to fix the orbitals is not available in orthogonal (MO) methods, due to the orthonormality restriction. [Pg.84]


See other pages where Optimisation gradient method is mentioned: [Pg.100]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.692]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.971]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.13]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.29 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.29 ]




SEARCH



Gradient method

Optimisation

Optimisation Optimise

Optimisation Optimised

Optimisation method

© 2024 chempedia.info