Ohmic-diffusion control

The polarization curves consist of two parts in the mixed ohmic-diffusion-controlled electrodeposition [12]. The first part corresponds to the ohmic control... 

The Ohmic and the Mixed Ohmic-Diffusion Control of Electrodeposition Process... 

Nikolic ND, Popov KI, Zivkovic PM, Brankovic G (2013) A new insight into the mechanism of lead electrodeposition ohmic-diffusion control of the electrodeposition process. J Electroanal Chem 691 66-76... 

The initiation of dendritic growth in the case of very fast electrodeposition processes also will be followed by an increase of the deposition current density, and the overall current density will be larger than the limiting diffusion current on a flat active electrode. Based on the above discussion, the polarization curve equation in the mixed ohmic diffusion-controlled electrodeposition of metals can be determined as [108] ... 

For metals characterized by io Jl (electrodeposition in mixed ohmic-diffusion control of the electrodeposition e.g., Pb and Ag), increasing concentration of metal ions causes a decrease in both and [111]. Simultaneously, opposite to electrodeposition of metals in mixed activation-diffusion control, increasing the concentration of depositing ions leads to a strong increase in the io/t r tio. 

Transport of electrons along conducting wires surrounded by insulators have been studied for several decades mechanisms of the transport phenomena involved are nowadays well understood (see [1, 2, 3] for review). In the ballistic regime where the mean free path is much longer than the wire lengths, l 3> d, the conductance is given by the Sharvin expression, G = (e2/-jrh)N, where N (kpa)2 is the number of transverse modes, a, is the wire radius, a Fermi wave vector. For a shorter mean free path diffusion controlled transport is obtained with the ohmic behavior of the conductance, G (e2/ph)N /d, neglecting the weak localization interference between scattered electronic waves. With a further decrease in the ratio /d, the ohmic behavior breaks down due to the localization effects when /d < N-1 the conductance appears to decay exponentially [4]. 

In analyzing the polarization data, it can be seen that the cathodic reaction on the copper (oxygen reduction) quickly becomes diffusion controlled. However, at potentials below -0.4 V, hydrogen evolution begins to become the dominant reaction, as seen by the Tafel behavior at those potentials. At the higher anodic potentials applied to the steel specimen, the effect of uncompensated ohmic resistance (IRohmk) can be seen as a curving up of the anodic portion of the curve. 

There are three factors which may operate in controlling the speed of an electrode reaction, (i) the rate of the electrode process itself, (2) the rates of diffusion of the reactant and product, and (3) the ohmic resistance of the electrolyte. Reactions which have received the most study are those for which (i) is very slow, so that rate control due to 2) and (3) has been negligible or has been easily rendered so. A few investigations of moderately rapid electrode processes have been made in which diffusion control has been either disregarded, or minimised. However, most of... 

When spectroelectrochemistry is used as a tool in reaction kinetics, it is important to know accurately the rate of generation of reactive intermediates, that is, the accurate potential of the working electrode. This requirement becomes a particular problem when an OTE is the preferred electrode because of the ohmic drop in the electrode itself and the nonuniform current distributions often encountered. For the OTTLEs in particular, the accurate modeling of the diffusion in the cell also leads to rather complicated mathematical equations [346]. The most profitable way of operation is therefore to use a potential-step procedure where the potential is stepped to a value at which the heterogeneous electron transfer reaction proceeds at the diffusion-controlled rate. In transmission spectroscopy the absorbance, AB(t), of the initial electrode product B, in the absence of chemical follow-up reactions, is given by Eq. (99) [347,348], where b is the extinction coefficient of B. 

At overpotentials larger than 175 my the current density is considerably larger than the one expected from the linear dependence of current on overpotential. The formation of dendritic deposits (Fig. 16d-f) confirms that the deposition was dominantly under activation control. Thus, the elimination of mass transport limitations in the Ohmic-controlled electrodeposition of metals is due to the initiation of dendritic growth at overpotentials close to that at which complete diffusion control of the process on the flat part of the electrode surface occurs. 

The above argument, along with the evidences presented in Sections 5.3.2.1-5.3.2.2, indicates that other transport mechanisms than diffusion-controlled lithium transport may dominate during the CT experiments. Furthermore, the Ohmic relationship between Jiiu and A indicates that internal cell resistance plays a critical role in lithium intercalation/deintercalation. If this is the case, it is reasonable to suggest that the interfacial flux of lithium ion is determined by the difference between the applied potential E pp and the actual instantaneous electrode potential (t), divided by the internal cell resistance Keen- Consequently, lithium ions barely undergo any real potentiostatic constraint at the electrode/electrolyte interface. This condition is designated as cell-impedance-controlled lithium transport. 

The effects of gas bubbles include their obstruction of electric current and the stirring of electrolyte within a cell. Bubbles decrease the effective conductivity of the electrolyte and hence increase ohmic losses in the cell. Mixing the electrolyte in the crucial region near the surface, bubbles improve heat transfer away from the electrode to the walls or mass transfer of diffusion-controlled species to the electrode. 

Electrodeposition processes characterized by extremely high values of the exchange current density (/q oo) belong to the fast electrochemical processes, and they usually occur under mixed ohmic-diffusion or even full ohmic control of... 

Fig. 1.8 Morphologies of Pb deposits electrodeposited from 0.30 M Pb(N03)2 in 2.0 M NaN03 (a) the ohmic control, rj = 30 mV, and the diffusion control, (b) ri = 55 mV, (c, d) rj= 120 mV (Reprinted from Ref. [12] with permission from Elsevier and Ref. [23] with kind permission from Springer)...

Dendritic Growth Inside Diffusion Layer of the Active Macroelectrode and Ohmic Diffusion and Activation-Diffusion-Controlled Deposition and Determination of tji and tjc... 

Ohmic-Diffusion and Activation-Diffusion Controlled Deposition... 

When faradaic and charging currents flow through a solution, they generate a potential that acts to weaken the applied potential by an amount, iR, where i is the total current. This is an undesirable process that leads to distorted voltanunetric responses. It is important to note that, as described by equation (6.1.1.3), the cell resistance increases with decreasing electrode radius. Thus, the ohmic drop is not reduced at microelectrodes relative to macroelectrodes because of reduced resistance. However, the capacitive or double-layer charging current depends on the electrode area or r. Similarly, for reversible redox reactions under semi-infinite diffusion control, the faradaic current depends on the electrode area. This sensitivity to area means that the currents observed at microelectrodes are typically six orders of magnitude smaller than those observed at... 

---