Supreme Court, Ohio

The lower appeals court rejected the argument based on the Ohio Constitution, saying that the ordinance was a valid exercise of the police power. It did agree that part of the law did conflict with the U.S. code. The appellants then appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court. 

June The Ohio Supreme Court allows a suit against 15 gun manufacturers to proceed. Overturning a lower court decision, it accepts the city s claim that gun marketing practices created a substantial danger by making guns too easily available to criminals and children. 

The business community s massive investment in judicial elections through the Chamber of Commerce and related organizations had an impact on judicial behavior. A study of the votes of Supreme Court justices elected in Texas between 1994 and 1998 concluded that the justices were four times as likely to hear appeals from their campaign contributors and ten times more likely to hear appeals from substantial contributors. An analysis of the Ohio Supreme Court concluded that justices receiving contributions from parties involved in cases before their courts voted in favor of their contributors 70 percent of the time. And in a 2002 poll of 894 elected judges, only 36 percent said that campaign contributions had no influence at all on their decisions. ... 

The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals, holding that Ohio s law of trade secrets is not preempted by the patent laws of the United States, and further held (footnotes omitted) ... 

The Supreme Court considered the objective of the Ohio trade secret laws and considered that their laws were not at odds with the patent statutes. Neither removes matter from the public domain. If trade secrets were to apply only to non-patentable subject matter, an innovator would be at great risk in evaluating patentability. The court records on holding patents invalid clearly show that many inventors have invalid patents. To ask for a judgment on whether to seek protection as a trade secret or a patent puts too heavy a burden on the innovator. Quoting further ... 

One characteristic of the civil justice system is that it is decentralized Different courts can and do come to different conclusions. In 2002, in the case of Cincinnati v. Beretta the Ohio State Supreme Court ruled that plaintiffs had adequately demonstrated that the availability of guns to criminals caused by negligent marketing represented a substantial danger to the community—a major public nuisance. 

Here the parties are Brandenberg (the defendant who is appealing his case from a state court) and the state of Ohio. The case is in volume 395 of the U.S. Supreme Court Reports, beginning at page 44, and the case was decided in 1969. (For the Supreme Court, the name of the court is omitted.)... 

This device, known as contracting out, provided a temporary respite from tort claims, but it also served as a new target of labor and public agitation. Unfortunately, the courts were notoriously eager to uphold the status of these clauses as late as 1900 the US Supreme Court, for instance, in Voight v. Baltimore and Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company ruled, in language the current justices might well endorse, that the worker... 

The False Claims Act A Primer, http //www.justice.gov/sites/ default/files/civiFlegacy/201 l/04/22/C-FRAUDS FCA Primer.pdf U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2012). Basic Information, http //www.epa.gov/compliance/basics/nepa.html U.S. District Court, Central District of California, United States of America ex rel Nira Schwartz, Plaintiff v. TRW, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, and Boeing N. America, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants (1996), Plaintiff s Fourth Amended Complaint, Case No. CV 96-3605 CM (RMCx), United States District Court, Central District of California, http //www.fas.org/spp/starwars/program/news01/schwartz.pdf U.S. Supreme Court (2006), 547 U.S. 410, Garcetti v. Ceballos. 

Intuitive, empirical grasp of a concept was memorably expressed by Associate Justice Potter Stewart in the US Supreme Court decision in Jacobellis versus Ohio [12] Perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly [defining it]. But I know it when I see it. ... 

Supreme Court of the United States decision in Jacobellis vr. Ohio (1964) US Reports 378 184. URL http //laws.findlaw.com/ us/378/184.html... 

---