Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

False Claims Act

Nonetheless, the government has yet to bring a False Claims Act case which seeks damages for cGMP. One reason may be that the government has multiple other remedies within which to recover damages from noncompliant manufacturers, such as criminal fines and penalties and disgorgement. [Pg.59]

Under the direction of the chief compliance officer and the corporate compliance committee, each organization should develop written compliance policies that pertain to the organization s practices that may be at risk for noncompliance. The policy should clearly delineate the organization s commitment to comply with all federal and state standards, with an emphasis on preventing fraud and abuse. The compliance plan should address, at a minimum, the False Claims Act, the Anti-kickback Statutes, physician self-referral laws, and laws regarding bribery and improper gifts. Once the plan is developed, it should be reviewed and approved by the organization s board of directors. [Pg.434]

False Claims Act. The OIG and several state attorney generals determined the violations to be an industry-wide problem. The OIG and the Department of Justice made arrangements with many of fhe major chain pharmacies in fhis country to resolve the case the chains agreed (individually) to pay between 1.7 and 7.6 million to settle each case, and several chains were also required to enter into comprehensive corporate integrity agreements with the government. ... [Pg.438]

Similarly, billing Medicare or Medicaid for medications fhaf were obtained as free samples or trial supplies from manufacturers would also be considered as fraud under the False Claims Act. Furthermore, pharmacies that receive medication samples and bills for them also violate the PDMA. The pharmacist must track the disposition of free samples and frial supplies and assure that they are not fraudulently billed for. [Pg.440]

False claims The False Claims Act provides for any instances when a drug is promoted for an off-label (unapproved) indication, whereby a company can be held responsible for inciting the submission of false claims for drugs that have not been approved to treat the condition for which they were actually prescribed due to the company s promotional activities. [Pg.145]

Liability can result under other laws in the United States, such as the False Claims Act, which provides for civil proceedings to punish healthcare fraud when a person knowingly causes a false claim to be made to a government agency. A lawsuit can be filed by the government or by a citizen, who then receives a portion of the monetary recovery. [Pg.598]

Several US laws provide modest measures of support to engineers who wish to practice their profession in an ethically responsible manner. Four of the most noteworthy are the False Claims Act (FCA) of 1863 the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1970 ° the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) of 1977 and the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) of 1989. ... [Pg.238]

For a chronological list of whistle-blowing cases, some of which involved qui tam actions under the False Claims Act, see http //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List of whistleblowers See Case 13, p. 267. [Pg.239]

The False Claims Act A Primer, http //www.justice.gov/sites/ default/files/civiFlegacy/201 l/04/22/C-FRAUDS FCA Primer.pdf U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2012). Basic Information, http //www.epa.gov/compliance/basics/nepa.html U.S. District Court, Central District of California, United States of America ex rel Nira Schwartz, Plaintiff v. TRW, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, and Boeing N. America, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants (1996), Plaintiff s Fourth Amended Complaint, Case No. CV 96-3605 CM (RMCx), United States District Court, Central District of California, http //www.fas.org/spp/starwars/program/news01/schwartz.pdf U.S. Supreme Court (2006), 547 U.S. 410, Garcetti v. Ceballos. [Pg.264]

In U.S. v. Johnson, the Supreme Court rules that the Pure Food and Drug Act did not prohibit false claims about the benefits of a drug, only false claims about the ingredients. [Pg.106]

Under Sections 14 and 15 of the Food Safety Act, it is an offence to sell food that is not of the nature, substance or quality demanded by the consumer or to falsely or misleadingly describe or present food. The presence of any undeclared oils or false claims regarding the geographical origin of the oil may be considered to constitute such an offence. [Pg.182]

Most of the recent regulatory enforcement activity by the government pertaining to health care has focused on violahons of the False Claims Statutes, the Prescription Drug Marketing Act, or the Anti-kickback Statute. [Pg.429]

Phish [pronounced same as fish] The verb representing the act of sending an email to a user, falsely claiming to be an established legitimate enterprise in an attempt to scam the user into surrendering private information that will be used for identity theft. [Pg.523]

There have been a number of cases where gaps have been exposed in the Act. One involved the false claim that a video recorder would be given free on the purchase of a particular car. In fact, the price of the car, or the allowance given for a trade-in, was weighted to cover the cost of the recorder. In another case, an advertiser promised a refund on goods if they could be bought cheaper elsewhere but refused to honour the promise on certain goods. In both cases, the court ruled that the statements made were outside the relevant provisions of the Act. [Pg.104]

Prior to December 1994, an essential character test, was used to determine the validity of country of origin claims, in the context of Sections 52 and 53 (eb) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 in relation to false or misleading statements. However, in 1994 the Federal Court handed down a decision that effectively rejected the essential character test and created uncertainty about outcomes of future cases in this area. [Pg.682]

Amendment (1912) to the Pure Food and Drug Act Prohibited false or fraudulent advertising claims. [Pg.101]

The regulation of Echinacea products in the United States would fall under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA). In the United States, statutory 403 (a)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act prohibits labeling that is false or misleading. Under DSHEA, a structure/-function claim can be made, provided the claim meets the criteria set forth in statutory 403(r)(6). Structure/function claims are permissible if a specific disease is not targeted, unless reviewed by FDA. A structure/function claim such as supports the immune system would be acceptable whereas alleviates the common cold or flu would not be acceptable for Echinacea because the claim targets a specific disease state (i.e., cold or flu). [Pg.148]


See other pages where False Claims Act is mentioned: [Pg.59]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.628]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.734]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.345]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.59 , Pg.60 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.428 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.598 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.152 , Pg.238 , Pg.241 ]




SEARCH



Claims

© 2024 chempedia.info