Observed reaction order

Let us first present some transformational expressions for the steady-state step rate. Every path corresponding to the summand of Dx can include several steps for the consumption of the same substance. The weight of the corresponding spanning tree will then be characterized by the power exponent for the concentration of this reactant with which it enters into this spanning tree. This exponent is the total number of molecules consumed for all steps of a given path. 

Assuming that the chosen substance, A, reacts in p steps of the ra-step one-route mechanism, let us express the denominator of the steady-state rate as a polynomial with respect to its concentration 

We will now give some preliminary notes that will be necessary for the following discussions. 

Equation (74) has an interesting physicochemical sense. It appears that the observed order is controlled by three components. 

Thus the observed order is three-step and is controlled by the sum of intermediates, the reversibility of the previous steps u, and finally by the reaction reversibility as a whole. 

---

Even when there is a transport disguise, the reaction order remains one for a first-order reaction. But for reactions that are not intrinsically first order, the transport disguise changes the observed reaction order for an intrinsically zero-order reaction, the observed order becomes 1/2 and for an intrinsically second-order reaction it becomes 3/2 when 0 10. For all reaction orders the apparent activation energy is approximately half the intrinsic... 

Equation (1.20) is frequently used to correlate data from complex reactions. Complex reactions can give rise to rate expressions that have the form of Equation (1.20), but with fractional or even negative exponents. Complex reactions with observed orders of 1/2 or 3/2 can be explained theoretically based on mechanisms discussed in Chapter 2. Negative orders arise when a compound retards a reaction—say, by competing for active sites in a heterogeneously catalyzed reaction—or when the reaction is reversible. Observed reaction orders above 3 are occasionally reported. An example is the reaction of styrene with nitric acid, where an overall order of 4 has been observed. The likely explanation is that the acid serves both as a catalyst and as a reactant. The reaction is far from elementary. 

Determine which step is most likely to be rate limiting if a simple model can explain the observed reaction orders. 

Equations 12.4.22 and 12.4.24 indicate that the observed reaction order will differ from the intrinsic reaction order in the presence of intraparticle and/or external mass transfer limitations. To avoid drawing erroneous conclusions about intrinsic reaction kinetics, we must be careful to either eliminate these limitations by proper choice of experimental conditions or to properly take them into account in our data analysis. 

The second term in eqn. (110) is the double layer correction to the observed reaction order due to the changes in the interfacial potential distribution with the bulk concentration of the ionic reactant. When 9A02/9 In [O] = 0, eqn. (110) becomes identical to eqn. (89) for concentrations instead of activities. This occurs in the presence of large excess of supporting electrolyte, since the concentration of the reacting ion 02o does not determine the interfacial potential distribution and the true reaction order is obtained in eqn. (110). 

This scheme requires the assumption of extremely strong association of all lithium-oiganics down to at least 10-4 molar concentration if the observed reaction orders are to be obeyed. It assumes in agreement with earlier workers that only unassociated lithium alkyls and aryls are reactive. The six-fold association of butyllithium required is in agreement with physical measurements although admittedly these were carried out at much higher concentrations. Morton and co-workers (69) have shown that the polymer molecules are indeed associated into dimers in this system from a quantitative study of the decrease in solution viscosity on removal of the charged species at the ends of the polymer molecules. 

A spectrum of metal compound reactivities in petroleum could arise for several reasons. Nickel and vanadium exist in a diversity of chemical environments. These can be categorized into porphyrinic and non-porphyrinic species vanadyl and nonvanadyl or associated with large asphaltenic groups and small, isolated metal-containing molecules. Each can be characterized by unique intrinsic reactivity. Reaction inhibition which occurs between the asphaltenes and the nonasphaltenes, as well as between Ni and V species, can also contribute to reactivity distributions. The parallel reaction interpretation of the observed reaction order discrepancy is therefore compatible with the multicomponent nature of petroleum. Data obtained at low conversion could appear as first order and only at higher conversions would higher-order effects become obvious. The... 

Termination reactions involving reactions of HO with H02 and 02 usually reduce the overall reaction rates. Because UV-irradiated aqueous H202 solutions contain a complex mixture of transient radicals, the observed reaction orders are usually not contributed by a single oxidation reaction of a given radical species (Beltran et al., 1996a-c). In addition, hydrogen peroxide can also dissociate by a dismutation reaction, as shown in Equation (7.12), with the maximum rate occurring at a pH equal to its pKa value ... 

This is not by itself a kinetic method. It must be combined with either the differential or the integration method and involves keeping all the reactants but one in large excess so that their concentration does not vary through the reaction under these conditions, the observed reaction order is that of the limiting reagent. For example, the simple second-order reaction of Equation 3.18,... 

Variation of reactant concentrations. The observed reaction orders can provide pointers to the catalytic mechanism in cases where theoretical equations exist for both surface-controlled and diffusion-controlled situations (cf. Sect. 4). 

Except for reactions known to be single-step, molecularities or mechanisms cannot be deduced from observed reaction orders, nor can orders be predicted from stoichiometries. 

Equations 7.26 and 7.27 differ only in the first denominator term, which must be negligible to fit the observed reaction order with respect to CO. A discrimination between the pathways II and III on the basis of the evidence at hand is therefore not possible. In fact, the most probable pathway is slightly more complex than either ... 

The procedure of arriving at a probable mechanism via an empirical rate equation, as described in the previous section, is mainly useful for elucidation of (linear) pathways. If the reaction has a branched network of any degree of complexity, it becomes difficult or impossible to attribute observed reaction orders unambiguously to their real causes. While the rate equations of a postulated network must eventually be checked against experimental observations, a handier tool in the early stages of network elucidation are the yield-ratio equations (see Section 6.4.3). This approach relies on the fact that the rules for simple pathways also hold for simple linear segments between network nodes and end products. 

The conventional procedure of fitting a rate equation to experimental data is to use a power law reflecting the observed reaction orders. However, while fractional reaction orders may provide an acceptable fit, they cannot be produced by reasonable mechanisms. A better way is to fit the data to "one-plus" rate equations, that is, equations containing concentrations with integer exponents only, but with denominators composed of two or more additive terms of which the first is a "one." Such equations behave much like power laws with fractional exponents but, in contrast to these, can arise from reasonable mechanisms and therefore are more likely to hold over wide ranges of conditions. As an exception, rate equations with constant exponents of one half or integer (positive or negative) multiples of one half can result from chain reactions and reactions initiated by dissociation, and are acceptable if such a mechanism is probable or conceivable. 

One way to explain the observed reaction orders is to also allow for a noncompetitive dihydrogen adsorption step in the sequence. This added complexity makes sense because more surface sites are available to dihydrogen than ethylene because of the very small size of a H2 molecule. The catalytic cycle for ethylene... 

Derive a rate expression for the hydrogenation of ethylene on Pt assuming steps 1, 2, and 3 are quasi-equilibrated, step 4 is virtually irreversible, and C2H5 is the most abundant reaction intermediate covering almost the entire surface ([ ]o [ C2H5]). Discuss why the rate expression cannot properly account for the experimentally observed half order dependence in H2 and zero-order dependence in ethylene. Could the observed reaction orders be explained if adsorbed ethylene ( C2H4 ) were the most abundant reaction intermediate Explain your answer. 

The observed reaction order with respect to the catalyst concentration less than unity (0.61) suggests that a radical chain reaction (Eqs. 14.2 I4.S) occurs at least partly. 

The values of x and y (orders for and CO) for the temperature range of 200-220 C are 1.4 and 0.60 respectively. Vannice (ref. 3.) obtained values of +1.14 and -0.05 for X and y. respectively, for methanation on 15% Fe/Al203 at 275 C. The lack of agreement suggests that the reaction orders are functions of temperature and reactant partial pressures It should be noted that the trends in Fig. 3 are consistent with the observed reaction orders. 

This result is consistent with the observed reaction order, with kxki = kobs-... 

The observed reaction order for compound A is given by the formula ... 

This result implies that not the intrinsic kinetics are observed, but the so-called disguised or false kinetics. Consequently, the observed rate is inversely proportional to the particle size, the observed reaction order is (n + l)/2, and the observed activation energy is about half the true activation energy. 

Although the mechanism is similar to the mechanistic steps presented in reference [65], Taylor et al. [55] used enhanced H2 dissociation in the presence of O2, consisfenf wifh bofh previous experimenfal observation [91] and DFT calculations [63,64], Moreover, the rate determining step (Eq. 11.12) is unique because the fractional propylene order required the inclusion of adsorbed propylene in fhe RDS [55]. This mechanism and ifs associated rate expression (Eq. 11.15) were the simplest means of reproducing fhe observed reaction orders (n = 0.18, m = 0.14). It does imply a relation between H2 and O2 orders m + 1/2, 2rti), however. The addition of a third active site for dissociative H2 adsorption [65] would provide independent control over all three reaction orders. 

Rate of isomerization versus partial pressure of pentene. The slope gives the observed reaction order a = 0.5 for the isomerization of pentene... 

In all three cases it is possible to influence the product distribution by changing process conditions so as to bring about changes in the ratio of rate constants. The selectivity can be enhanced by changing the operating temperature if the activation energies of the two rate constants are different. Other methods by which the selectivity can be improved include use of a catalyst to accelerate the reaction desired and use of an inhibitor to repress the unwanted reaction. Use of catalysts and inhibitors may, however, lead to changes in the observed reaction orders with concomitant implications for the type of reactor that is preferred. 

Besides, the linear correlation between Vmax tnd precatalyst loading below 0.005 mol% would suggest a zero order in platinum. Obviously, this indicates the limits of our rudimentary analysis. Indeed, this method does not take into account the variation of catalyst concentration throughout the measures of Vmax- Additionally, platinum is not only involved in the hydrosilylation catalytic cycle, but also in the activation process and the deactivation pathways, definitely affecting its observed reaction order. Consequently, this approach is unable to determine Idnetic order in platinum. 

---